As I said before, we are headed for a personal "DoBox" so we need to carry just one thing. It is a phone, camera, computer, GPS, watch, reader, and the hundreds of personal customized apps and software available.
With the high resolution displays, your guess at convergence size is about right. Small can easily become too small and bigger is only so much better and then it becomes cumbersome.
James, I think Apple was too late to introduce the 7” mini version in market. Other competitors Samsung, Amazon, BB etc have both versions of 10 & 7 inches. So they already have a good momentum in sales for 7”. From my personal perspective, I feel very much comfortable with my Samsung 7” tablet.
Allan, in information technology week I had read an article about IPad mini. They had peeled the device and had analyzed each part by part with quality and cost wise. So finally they made a remark that the actual cot to cost of IPad mini comes less than $250. Have you come across such cost to cost calculations.
In the famous Eddy Cue email, it showed Steve Jobs was ok with the 7" tablet behind the curtain.
"Having used a Samsung Galaxy [Tab], I tend to agree with many of the comments below... I believe there will be a 7-inch market and we should do one. I expressed this to Steve several times since Thanksgiving and he seemed very receptive the last time."
That said, I think Apple is trying to say "The 7 inch Android tablet is a good idea, glad we thought of it with the iPad mini." The small form factor is great for casual and on the go usage. However, the iOS is starting to look and operate in a very dated way. No offense to Apple, but their OS works just like my Palm Pilot IIIc with a capacitive screen.
I've been looking at the Samsung line of smartphones and tablets lately, and think that might be the way to go. It seems to me, as cool as Apple is in my opinion, they seem to be getting a bit too big for their britches. My friend recently pulled out her iPhone 5 and said how great it is. I'm mostly annoyed by the fact that if I go that route, I'll have to find yet another plug for the new charger and also have to get a new case. Is it worth it? I think the Apple Execs are laughing all the way to the bank - at our expense.
I will say, however, that I do my daily work on a MacBook Pro and I wouldn't trade it for the world. My one complaint - I wish it ran Flash!
Jennifer, I agree with you. This device will compete with much less expensive devices. Frankly, the processor that everyone talks about is just an ARM processor. There are lots of ARM products out there that are comparable. To me, Apple talking about the Apple processor is mostly marketing. Any chip vendor will design you precisely the ARM based system you need for the volumes that Apple can commit to.
I know someone who had a Kindle (the last one with a keyboard) and an iPad 2. The iPad was given to him by his university. He sold the iPad. It had lots of glitz, but he really needed something to read his books on. He can read PDFs and can get most, if not all, of his textbooks for the device. It also fits in the back pocket of his jeans. And he is skinny. With the e-ink he can see it anywhere and the battery lasts a long time. With Wi-Fi he can even check his e-mail. To compete, Apple needs to be in this space.
What I also see is that the market is fragmenting. The dream in the industry for at least the last ten years, or so, has been convergence. It is not happening. I saw a guy the other day who had a laptop, a tablet, and a smart phone. I just had to go up to him and ask, "...what happened to convergence?" The Samgung Galaxy Note II has a 5.5" display. This is the space in which convergence will take place.
I was surprised to see the cost of the iPad Mini. When it was announced, I admit, I didn't do much research on it or pay too much attention to it, but thought for sure it would be a sub-$200 tablet. As the article states, isn't this supposed to compete with the Kindle Fire or the Google Nexus 7? Am I missing something here?
I have a Kindle Fire and am quite impressed with it. My first-generation iPad - not so much. I can only assume/hope the iPad is leaps and bounds above where it was when it came out.
A new method of modeling how they are created with chemical vapor deposition (CVD) could reduce the cost of carbon nanostructures used for for research and commercial applications, including advanced sensors and batteries.
Researchers have been developing a number of nano- and micro-scale technologies that can be used for implantable medical technology for the treatment of disease, diagnostics, prevention, and other health-related applications.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies.
You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived.
So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.