HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog

Slideshow: Itís a Simulated World

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: SIMULATED WORLD
Rob Spiegel   4/1/2014 10:18:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Bobjengr. You're right. Things really have changed for the better because of simulation. a ton of waste has been taken out of a lot of processes.

bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
SIMULATED WORLD
bobjengr   3/28/2014 4:40:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Excellent post Rob.  In my lifetime there are two marvelous technologies contributory to design and model making: 1.) Simulation and 2.) "Additive" manufacturing.  I am blown away with the capabilities now available with simulation software.  COMSOL, Workspace LT, Moldflow, Autodesk Simulation, etc all lessen, if used properly, design time.  I do agree with William K. in that, when you think you have an acceptable design, you probably need to model that component or design.  This is where 3-D printing or other additive process contribute.  Rob, you and I are in the same generation -- remember: design, prototype, redesign, re-prototype, etc etc?    You know the drill.  No longer is this necessary with these two technologies available to us.  Times are changing and for the better.  Again, great post and thank you for keeping us informed.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: getting better, but been done for a while
Cabe Atwell   3/26/2014 4:33:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Running software-based simulations is cheaper than real-world testing in most cases. Almost all cars a designed virtually now.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: getting better, but been done for a while
Charles Murray   3/25/2014 5:55:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the reply, naperlou. Even though I did some FEA early in my career, I still feel like I've lost touch with today's analysis techniques. The last paragraph in your article from last year suggests maybe I'm not as far behind the curve as I thought. Thanks.

http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=1386&doc_id=261758

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: getting better, but been done for a while
William K.   3/25/2014 10:03:41 AM
NO RATINGS
N.L. is certainly correct in that the simulation tools and solvers are very useful, but not a substitute for understanding. Bob Pease was a big voice in pointing out that the results would never be more accurate than the model, and that without adequate understanding the model would usually be inaccurate. Besides that, without adequate understanding and insight it is hard to decide if the results are correct, or if there must be an error someplace. That can happen just by missing a decimal in some of the input data, for example. It takes insight and experience to understand if a result is "reasonable". We called that "the Maselowski criteria" at one company, after a favorite engineering instructor at LIT.

My other point is that many of the programs serve as a substitute for adequate visulaization skills. Not all folks can visualize functionality correctly, or even at all.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: getting better, but been done for a while
Elizabeth M   3/25/2014 5:40:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting slideshow, Rob. While Lou is right that simulation as a tool has been used for a long time, I learned a bit here about the range of use for simulation tools. For example, I didn't know about the Mars Rover landing simulation, even though I know NASA uses simulation in a lot of areas of technology.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: getting better, but been done for a while
naperlou   3/24/2014 7:39:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Chuck, I am glad you asked.  I wrote about that in a blog on this site (http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=1386&doc_id=261758).  If you look at the last paragraph you will get a feeling for what I mean.

CAE tools allow one to do the analysis, but you still need to know the field.  These tools provide the solvers, but actually analyzing a particular situation still requires engineering knowledge.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: getting better, but been done for a while
Charles Murray   3/24/2014 7:13:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Admittedly, I'm behind the curve on this, naperlou, but I'm wondering: Do you still need to be an expert to do CFD and FEA? Or have these tools allowed for others to run the simulations? When I graduated from college in the mid-1970s, I did a little FEA work, and most of the older engineers that I worked with had never heard of it. When I took my first FEA class in school, there were a total of four students in it, including me. In my second FEA class, I was the only student. The number of people who could run FEA in private industry back then was very limited.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: getting better, but been done for a while
Rob Spiegel   3/24/2014 2:45:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Good points Naperlou. I went to a Siemens conference on CAE PLM last year and found that processing speed has greatly changed simulation. Calculations that once had taken weeks or months now take a couple hours. And the cost of the computing is significantly lower.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
getting better, but been done for a while
naperlou   3/24/2014 2:37:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, the current tools used for simulation at a number of levels are greatly improved over what was available in the past.  On the other hand, I worked on manufactuing plant designs using simultation on the early 1980s.  In the 1970s I worked for Link Simulation Systems.  We had industrial plant simulations that were very high fidellity.  Customers used them for training, but found they were so good that they could use them for plant tuning.  By just running the math model, they could tune the process for changes in feedstocks. 

On the other hand, it was much more difficult and visualization was much more expensive.  The current crop of tools are also more general purpose.  Becuause computing is much less expensive, a lot more simulation can be done.  I also like that the tools apply generalized solvers.  This makes for a lot less custom software.

Partner Zone
More Blogs
Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones used to fare quite well in the repairability department, but last year's flagship S5 model took a tumble, scoring a meh-inducing 5/10. Will the newly redesigned S6 lead us back into star-studded territory, or will we sink further into the depths of a repairability black hole?
Fifteen European research centers have launched EuroCPS to help European companies develop innovative products for the Internet of Things.
In 2003, the world contained just over 500 million Internet-connected devices. By 2010, this figure had risen to 12.5 billion connected objects, almost six devices per individual with access to the Internet. Now, as we move into 2015, the number of connected 'things' is expected to reach 25 billion, ultimately edging toward 50 billion by the end of the decade.
NASA engineer Brian Trease studied abroad in Japan as a high school student and used to fold fast-food wrappers into cranes using origami techniques he learned in library books. Inspired by this, he began to imagine that origami could be applied to building spacecraft components, particularly solar panels that could one day send solar power from space to be used on earth.
Biomedical engineering is one of the fastest growing engineering fields; from medical devices and pharmaceuticals to more cutting-edge areas like tissue, genetic, and neural engineering, US biomedical engineers (BMEs) boast salaries nearly double the annual mean wage and have faster than average job growth.
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 20 - 24, Taking the Internet of Things to the Cloud
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service