The number of 3D printers on the market seems to have risen exponentially over the past couple years. Therefore, many printers already have dedicated communities and loyal customers. How then would someone make his or her own 3D printer that can compete in the existing market? TJIKO Labs believes it has created a unique printer, which can bring some advantages to the market.
The Snap 3D printer is a fully functional 3D printer that can be built by snapping together the structure and electronics. The advantage it brings with it is that users will be able to fully assemble their 3D printers without having any technical knowledge. Additionally, since the printer does not use any fasteners, disassembling and assembling the printer is quick and easy, along with swapping out parts such as the Extruder. The durable frame is made from a high-density polythylene (HDPE) plastic, which will be available in different colors. The frame will also house the electronics, which will sit beneath the heated bed.
A white version of the Snap3D printer. (Source: www.tjiko.com/)
While the Snap 3D printer is assembled unlike any other printer, it has features similar to other 3D printers, which will make it competitive on the market. The printer features a build volume of 8 inch x 8 inch x 8 inch with a 100-micron layer resolution. It will use 3 mm ABS, PLA, or Nylon filament. It will also feature a Viki LCD for a control panel interface, a Helios heated bed, a J head nozzle, and a microSD input. Therefore, the printer will be able to work as a standalone machine not requiring a computer.
Currently its creators have a Kickstarter campaign to promote their product. Backers can help support their goal, which was not met by the deadline, and possibly pre-order a printer for themselves at a discounted price. There are still 37 opportunities left to receive a Snap3D printer special kit with ABS filament for $649. After those go the printers will run for $699. In addition, backers can also get a fully assembled printer with 3ABS filaments for $849.
Although the Kickstarter initiative ended without reaching the goal, the team is certain this printer can still be successful. We have been working on this for two years, so we'll be rolling on our website and working with customers and distributors who already contacted us or new [customers], a company representative told Design News, in an email. We are on Kickstarter to make it affordable, because of manufacturing and components. This is a project to make it cheaper, not design a 3D printer. We have already overcome design and manufacturing, the only issue was we wanted to get it in the hands of people who can afford it.
Most printers on the market cost thousands of dollars. For example, the MakerBot Replicator 2 runs for $2,199.00, a CubeX single head printer will cost about $2,499.00, and a Cubify Cube 3D printer will cost $1,299.00. While there are printers that exist that are cheaper than a thousand dollars, many begin to lose their print resolution, print volume, and reliability as prices drop. As a result, the Snap3D printer might make a perfect solution to those searching for a 3D printer.
Charles I agree. I have gotten some sample parts from other makers, they are impressive. If this is as good as I have seen then great. If not, then probably just for the home user that wants to make toys or parts without tolerances. As Nadine pointed out, it probably isn't for production, just general use. For the price though I wouldn't expect much more. Plus I think it looks pretty cool!
Does it come with Ikea-like instructions for assembly? For a non-mechanical genius like me, I thnk I would need something better! An interesting idea and the price is right, but if putting together a printer on your own is what makes it affordable, I think I will still have to wait a bit before jumping into this market.
So now we are offered a 3D printer for use by those with no technical knowledge? It seems that the pandering to those who choose to not learn anything about the tools they use has reached a new level. While simplifying assembly may be a good idea if it does not reduce reliability, why in the world should these tools be provided to those who are not willing to learn? Of course the profit motive is a main driver in this direction, and there are probably quite a few hobby users who do have technical understanding and just need a lower priced package to produce thier designs. That may be a better aspect to emphasise than the part about not needing any technical knowledge to assemble the system.
Nadine, the fact is that sometimes we would all be berrter off if the uneducated were not able to utilize some technologies. We wind up with all kinds of junk that contributes nothing to anybody's quality of life, but it still consumes resources in it's production.
And why in the world should those who refuse to learn be handed all of the benefits that we who took the effort to learn have? Why in the world should laziness be rewarded?
Making things so simple that "everybody can do it" is part of the reason that engineering no longer gets the respect that it once did. But there is still a big difference between being able to do something and being able to do it correctly.
William, I share your opinion. But Nadine may have a point, and the ( 3D Printing) / (Additive Manufacturing ) arena might now have a natural division growing, because of it.
To William's point, 3D printing is born from a very complex and highly technical origin. 3D Systems, inc invented the first Stereo Lithography machines in the late 1980's, and sophisticated veteran end-users have been contributing to the improvements for years, as their ever-increasing end-user demands required tougher and more resilient materials, better step resolution, and new polymer options ranging from transparent to flexible rubber simulants. As a longtime design engineer, I need these advancements, and my customers are usually willing to pay for the high quality materials these advanced apparatuses can offer.
To Nadine's point, the pervasive nature of 3D printing is reaching into every aspect of humanity today; allowing capabilities to people who never before would have seen these technological benefits, and who may marvel at the ease of creation. Imagine the benefit of a mid-African country native, seeing an humanitarian worker print a new PVC elbow for a broken well pump. On the spot water fix. Amazing!
But the gap between these two avenues SHOULD widen, because the vision of the $5 PVC elbow fix is clear in the sight of the demanding industrial customer who really needs a $100 high resolution component housing for precision electronics. These are two very different use-cases. Just acknowledge the differences.
This article seems to describe a tiny Kickstarter entity who is focused on the "snap-together" aspect of the printer-stand, more than the printer itself (is it outsourced-?!) That point does seem to confuse the issue. A user ought not to concern themselves as much with the construction of the stand of the printer, as much as the quality and usability of the resulting manufactured good. There is a difference.
Jim, my complaint is more about those who don't understand what they are doing and wind up causing problems of all kinds, including making life unpleasant for those of us who do understand what the process is. Lack of understanding then leads to things being demanded that can't be delivered. Picture that same native in your example now demanding that a new crankshaft be produced for the pump in the same water system, and becoming very unhappy when the answer is no. That is the sort of problem that will appear.
And just consider what would be the outcome of a proliferation of reverse engineering programs that allowed people to make approximate copies of all kinds of things, and then get into a mess when the copy fails on them at a bad time. It will be a lot like teaching a monkey how to load a gun and fire it.
Very well said; especially the part about a monkey with a gun. William, I TOTALLY get it. But I have relieved myself of the staggering burden to attempt to guide humanity into the right behaviors. That's Jesus's job, and I trust He'll get it right, eventually. History is filled with countless examples of this same thing, where crowds of fools are running ahead of the leaders with the know-how. I get it. Best thing we can do, is accept it, and solidify our own fortresses against the looming collapse of the masses.
As an engineer I am obligated to try to have my efforts benefit humankind, while understanding that I also have an obligation to provide my customers with the value that they pay for. Mostly that happens without any conflicts because providing the best solutions does benefit everybody, at a minimum, by not wasting resources. ( I hope that explanation make sense).
Part of that is avoiding leading folks down the path of things that just will not work, which sometimes is met with accusations of being negative, as in "Why can't I make structural beams out of this regrind plastic", when it is clear that the materials just are not strong enough. And I did get a request for a proposal for a machine to extrude municiple garbage into landscaping beams. The problem was that the process did not do what the customer thought it was doing. If the claim was fraud or just lack of understanding I don't know, but pointing out that the process as described could not do what it claimed to be doing did not make any friends at all. But we were saved from our taxes purchasing a million dollar machine that did nothing useful.
My point being that a lack of knowledge, while it does not limit creativity, it certainly tends to limit success. How about that for a profound observation?
Clever assembly technique without the use of fastening devices. I agree with Jim about multiple 3D printing markets, as DN has reported various times. Actually, there are more than two already, probably about 5 or 6 general chunks, depending on various combinations of machines/materials and users: end-production for consumers, prototyping for large and small businesses, end-production for commercial /small business, end-production for large corporations. Aerospace, with its heavy use of metals, is probably its own separate space.
Interesting idea to allow the customer to snap together the printer themselves. Reminds me of a furniture kit where 'some assembly is required'. Perhaps the next generation printer will be a mobile version that can easity be folded into a smaller volume and then quickly be set up at another location.
Very interesting Cabe. The first thought I had was--this 3-D printer is ideal for the classroom and for the purpose of demonstrating the benefits of "additive" manufacturing and component making. The principals could be demonstrated fully with a device such as this including possible accuracy with more robust systems. In short, I do feel this printer can fill a need. Excellent post.
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
Some humanoid walking robots are also good at running, balancing, and coordinated movements in group settings. Several of our sports robots have won regional or worldwide acclaim in the RoboCup soccer World Cup, or FIRST Robotics competitions. Others include the world's first hockey-playing robot and a trash-talking Scrabble player.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.