HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog
MIT Research Could Dramatically Improve Solar Cell Efficiency
5/24/2013

An artist's rendering of the extraction of electrons from a solar cell during a photo incident. Researchers at MIT have proven that this occurrence can knock loose more than one electron -- achieving a singlet exciton fission process -- breaking the previous limit and paving the way to improve the efficiency of solar cells beyond the current 34 percent theoretical limit.   (Source: MIT/Christine Daniloff)
An artist’s rendering of the extraction of electrons from a solar cell during a photo incident. Researchers at MIT have proven that this occurrence can knock loose more than one electron -- achieving a singlet exciton fission process -- breaking the previous limit and paving the way to improve the efficiency of solar cells beyond the current 34 percent theoretical limit.
(Source: MIT/Christine Daniloff)

Return to Article

View Comments: Threaded|Newest First|Oldest First
naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Progress
naperlou   5/24/2013 9:11:33 AM
Elizabeth, well this is something.  I think the headline on the article overstates the potential.  It looks like a 9% increase in electron production.  This is good, but not the quite as amazing as I thought when I read the title.

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Progress
NadineJ   5/24/2013 10:56:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Agreed.  Many titles here use hyperbole.  Words like dramatically or "best...ever" can create high expectations.  The researchers are very excited about it.  As I always say, I'd like to see more analysis on the site. 

This is moving in the right direction.  Let's see where it goes.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Progress
Ann R. Thryft   5/24/2013 12:50:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for covering this, Elizabeth. Sounds like an important step forward for solar power. I'm not clear how the increase from 25 to 30 percent efficiency qualifies as "huge," but if efficiency could be pushed even further, beyond 30 percent as the article mentions, that's significant.



tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Progress
tekochip   5/25/2013 10:09:50 AM
NO RATINGS
My guess is that the big difference between 25 and 30 percent will be the cost? Right now the threshold of pain for panel efficiency is about 15%. Yes, you can get a 25% panel, but the cost begins to rise sharply. Maybe the new material will allow for a cost-effective 30% panel.


taimoortariq
User Rank
Gold
Re: Progress
taimoortariq   5/25/2013 3:19:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the the informative article Elizabeth. I think it is a huge discovery and a big advancement. And it can further lead to more research in this area, because the results from this experiment are very positive. But still the change in percentage from 25% to around 30% efficiency is not that huge to cause a big difference.

Electricity produced from solar energy is still not comparable to that produced from other resources like hydropower and batteries etc. For example, one cannot run high load house appliances like air conditioner, referigerator etc from solar cells. So still there is a long way to go. Nonetheless, a great acheivement for future research.

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Progress
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   5/26/2013 7:09:18 PM
While I'm no Physicist or Chemist, I'm having a hard time understanding 1.09 electrons per photon.

Putting that aside, it was 1983 when I wrote my Thesis for my Bachelor's degree on the topic of Photovoltaic cell manufacturing.  At the time, the exchange elements being used were Boron and Silicone, and the energy efficiency yield was generally accepted to be at about 10%.

So, today, 30 years later, its now 30%, and MIT considers this a breakthrough.  Seems like an average efficiency improvement of about 1% per year.  ( * sigh * )  It's a long, slow road, but I guess it's still progress.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Progress
Elizabeth M   5/27/2013 4:57:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Agree, Lou, perhaps the headline should have been changed during editing before the story was posted. But I think the idea is this potentially could set a precedent for the future development of solar cells in a way that's very different from what's happening now, so in some ways I guess the case could be made for a "dramatic" improvement. Point taken, though.

g_ost
User Rank
Gold
Re: Progress
g_ost   5/27/2013 6:59:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Pentacene, this compound, which is a purple powder, slowly degrades upon exposure to air and light. This is greath ideea to improve overall solar cells effciency but is just a research result. I hope it will find a way (somehow) to production or will trigger additional ideeas in this direction....

a.saji
User Rank
Silver
Re: Progress
a.saji   5/27/2013 11:15:16 AM
NO RATINGS
I think we can expect a lot of things favorably from the solar systems in the future. This might help other industries to use them in some way where they can make maximum out of it.                             

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Progress
Elizabeth M   5/28/2013 6:13:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Indeed, a.saji, with all the research in this area there should be improvements fast. And hopefully one day solar will be seamlessly integrated into more traditional power grids for even more widespread impact.

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Cost
Greg M. Jung   5/25/2013 1:40:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Great breakthrough.  I was especially interested when the article noted that this new efficiency could possibly be achieve with minimal cost increase.  Very encouraging.

 

far911
User Rank
Silver
This is one area of research....
far911   5/26/2013 5:20:14 PM
NO RATINGS
This is one area of research that I believe is eventually going to pay off significantly in terms of conserving natural energy resources.The efficiency gains may not be huge for now, but it's a step in the right direction. Ultimately, it's bringing us closer to an eco-friendly environment.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Yield from panels
Mydesign   5/28/2013 5:30:41 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Elizebeth, that's great news. As of now the yield from panels are less (production) and hence any improvement in technology may be helpful for a better production. I mean more power from the panels.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Yield from panels
Elizabeth M   5/28/2013 6:02:07 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Mydesign, this bodes well for the future production of more efficient and powerful solar panels. There is a lot of other research in this area that also could provide similar results.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yield from panels
Mydesign   5/31/2013 4:00:23 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"this bodes well for the future production of more efficient and powerful solar panels. There is a lot of other research in this area that also could provide similar results."

Elizabeth, what are the other types of researches happening in solar energy harvesting?

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Yield from panels
Cabe Atwell   5/31/2014 12:27:22 AM
NO RATINGS
MIT is now looking at incorporating graphene into the mix, which would dramatically improve electron loss, making them more efficient. They would also be able to grab power from more of the sun's spectrum besides infrared.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yield from panels
Mydesign   6/3/2014 7:41:24 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"MIT is now looking at incorporating graphene into the mix, which would dramatically improve electron loss, making them more efficient. They would also be able to grab power from more of the sun's spectrum besides infrared."

Cabe, that means efficiency can be increased. that's a great news.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Breaking the theoretical barrier
William K.   5/28/2013 10:16:02 AM
NO RATINGS
This is an interesting and potentially valuable discovery, that is certain. Proving that some well thought theoretical limit is not a true limit is a worthwhile achievement, no question about that.

But it has been pointed out that pentacine is not really a very stable compound, and that would add quite a bit to the challenge of commercialization. So the path from laboratory discovery to a reproducable experiment will take  some real effort and a few breakthroughs, and achieving a commercially viable realization may require some more fundamental advances. 

One thing that I would wonder about, the increase of 1.09 electrons per 1 photon, equates to 109 per hundred photons, which is just barely beyond the level of uncertainty in some kinds of measurements. So, as in other physics experiments, it would be quite appropriate now for more details to be published so that others could duplicate the experiment. After all, that is the standard process for validating some new claim, which is for others to be able to obtain similar results based on the published data. Sometimes, when results seem to be far better than reality would predict, it is found that those results are not so very correct. I realize the immense pressure to publish these findings prior to others publishing them, so I wish the authors good luck.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Breaking the theoretical barrier
Elizabeth M   5/29/2013 6:03:54 AM
NO RATINGS
These are valuable points, William K. As with most research, the path from the lab to commercialization can be longer than expected and filled with trial and error. Perhaps the authors felt pressure to publish, as you suggest, before they had this technology fully baked. But even if it's not the end all be all and only serves to help improve other efforts to boost efficiency of solar cells, it certainly is a good thing.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Breaking the theoretical barrier
William K.   5/29/2013 10:12:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Elizabeth, my point was intended to be that a lot of press release type announcements tend to deliver the impression that whatever has been discovered will be available on store shelves in a few weeks, and that this may lead to a whole lot of unreasonable conclusions by many of those who are able to speak very well but posess less technical insight than the averag stone wall or gate post. (pardon the antique analogy.) The overall effect on the technically illiterate general populace is a bit negative, in that as a matter of course, the great expectations are underfulfilled. That in turn leaves room for all kinds of false product representations.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Breaking the theoretical barrier
Elizabeth M   5/30/2013 4:40:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for clarifying that, William. I completely see what you're saying and it's true, a lot of the research happening will be in the lab for a long time before it ever makes it out there commercially, if it ever does at all! So your point is completely valid and I hope you don't think I was discounting it. I usually try to clarify this in stories I write so if I wasn't clear in this one, my apologies!

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Breaking the theoretical barrier
William K.   5/30/2013 4:34:16 PM
NO RATINGS
OK, Elizabeth. The big concern of mine is all of those people who have no clue as to all that must happen to make some scientific discovery into a worthwhile product. They tend to blame engineers for not being able to produce instant miracles on demand. If I were that good, I would certainly be very rich indeed. But I am not.

jhankwitz
User Rank
Platinum
Funding
jhankwitz   5/28/2013 10:41:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I hope this article helps them get the funding needed to continue the project.

Jim_E
User Rank
Platinum
Thin Film?
Jim_E   5/28/2013 10:58:59 AM
NO RATINGS
I wonder if this technology can also be applied to the much cheaper (but less effecient) thin-film solar cells?

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Thin Film?
Elizabeth M   5/29/2013 6:00:42 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't know much about that technology, Jim_E. Can you elaborate?

Jim_E
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Thin Film?
Jim_E   5/29/2013 8:33:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Instead of being manufactured on rigid silicon wafers like a traditional solar cell, thin film solar cells can be manufactured on a flexible substrate with a reel to reel process similar to offset printing.  Thin film solar cells can even be constructed into products such as roofing materials, and are much cheaper to manufacture than traditional solar cells.  But, their effeciency is much less compared to traditional solar cells, as is their lifespan. 

There are advances being made, but the whole solar marketplace is in a funk due to Chinese production dumping, and the ending of various government subsidies.

Partner Zone
More Blogs
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
Some humanoid walking robots are also good at running, balancing, and coordinated movements in group settings. Several of our sports robots have won regional or worldwide acclaim in the RoboCup soccer World Cup, or FIRST Robotics competitions. Others include the world's first hockey-playing robot and a trash-talking Scrabble player.
Automation technology advances matched with expanded fracking and the growing urbanization of Asia, South America, and the Middle East, are fueling a boom in the automation industry.
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service