HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog

Boston Bombings Likely to Boost Video Surveillance Gear Sales

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Threaded|Newest First|Oldest First
Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Makes perfect sense
Elizabeth M   5/2/2013 9:16:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Of course, this makes perfect sense, especially considering video surveillance helped identify some of the people involved so quickly. I don't like the idea of "Big Brother" watching everyone, everywhere, and I'm sure some people feel a bit uncomfortable with video surveillance, but if it's done discreetly and not used for voyeuristic or overly paranoid surveillance-type purposes, seems like this would be a good thing.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Makes perfect sense
tekochip   5/2/2013 11:17:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I thought that it was interesting that releasing information to the public is what allowed authorities to apprehend the suspects. Dzhokhar wasn't found when the city was locked down, he was found when the lock down was lifted and a resident noticed something was askew.  Had the resident been allowed out of his home Dzhokhar could have been captured first thing in the morning.


Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Makes perfect sense
Jack Rupert, PE   5/3/2013 4:57:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The follow-up to that, tekochip, it that I heard primary reason they released the photos was because of the amateur investigators out there on the social media site who were fingering everybody and their brother as possible suspects.  Once they were focused in the right direction, the identities came out (although not necessarily by those who should have been making the phone calls).

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Boost in Surveillance
apresher   5/2/2013 8:00:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Not surprising that surveillance gear sales will jump after this.  So much publicity.  Hopefully it will be a deterrent if people realize there are so many cameras especially in public places.

Chuck_IAG
User Rank
Platinum
Tired of Big Brother watching
Chuck_IAG   5/3/2013 6:43:13 PM
NO RATINGS
How much freedom and privacy are we willing to give away to feel marginally safer?  It's commonly said that if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn't fear a loss of privacy.  But that's not the way things work.  The saying "He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security" is attributed to Ben Franklin.  Whoever said it, I agree.  Once all the cameras are up and watching every step you take, there's no going back.  The choices we make now will affect our great-grandchildren.  I hope that we are wiser than we seem to be.

Battar
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
Battar   5/5/2013 3:55:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Chuck, the cameras aren't there to watch you. They are set up to watch those who are out to cause you harm. Do you have a problem with that?

Chuck_IAG
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
Chuck_IAG   5/6/2013 6:19:15 PM
NO RATINGS
I most certainly do have a problem with that, and you should, too.  Think about it.  Atomic power was developed to provide a clean, near-unlimited energy source.  It became our greatest nightmare.  What was the problem?  The tech? Or the application?  Are you so certain that this all-seeing-eye of a future Big Brother cannot possibly be misused?  Fat chance.  I'm not sure that it is not already being misused, we just haven't learned about it yet.

Cell phones are so ubiquitous that we no longer make phone calls to houses- we call people.  It's hard to argue that's not a major advance forward, right?  But think about that opinion  the next time some bozo in front of you misses the green light yakking on his/her cell phone and you wait an extra 4 minutes for the next green.  Nothing wrong with the tech- it's what folks do with it.

It's all a matter of balance and common sense.  I see precious little in our present government to bolster my confidence that politicians have any of either commodity.

I'm not some armageddon militia-man with a stash of M-16s and canned peaches in my garage, by the way. Just a cantankerous old fool who's getting tired of seeing such obvious problems being ignored when they could be curtailed with logic and common sense before they grow into a real issue.  And here we sit thanking the government for taking away more of our freedoms.

The cameras are definitely watching me, and they're watching you too.  You'd better hope that your car and your appearance don't match some pattern they are looking for today, because the next step is real-time monitoring as a new wave of "proactive" policing becomes popular.  Don't assume this is the end game.  It's just a step.  If we'll accept this, what else will we put up with?

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
tekochip   5/7/2013 11:35:57 AM
NO RATINGS
I've gotta agree with you Chuck. I was on the border in Northern Ireland a number of years ago. There were cameras everywhere and machine gun nets with .50 Cal guns arming various checkpoints. Yes, those cameras and guns were there to protect me, but I would have felt safer without them.


Battar
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
Battar   5/8/2013 2:46:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Chuck, seems to me you watch too many cheap movies. My government isn't interested in me because I don't represent a threat, and they are democratic enough to allow me freedom of press, speech, and criticism (I live outside the US).

I do expect law enfocement agencies to make full use of surveillance to deter, identify, and prosecute criminals. The benefit to me and to my society far outweighs the risks. Of course, if I lived in a totalitarian regime I'd reach a different conclusion, but you and I live in the freeiest societies on the planet (and where I live, I can even drop an F-bomb on TV or radio without the FCC coming after me...)

Chuck_IAG
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
Chuck_IAG   5/8/2013 12:20:02 PM
NO RATINGS
@Battar,

First they came for the communists,  and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,  and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,  and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for me,  and there was no one left to speak for me.

Do you want to wait until they come for you?  Some people have trouble learning from history; hopefully you are not one of them.

Battar
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
Battar   5/9/2013 2:01:56 AM
NO RATINGS
They haven't come after anyone.

I wish  they would come after the trade-unionists.

Your comment doesn't address the issue of use of security cameras to fight crime.

Chuck_IAG
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
Chuck_IAG   5/9/2013 11:19:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Man, you're not getting it!  Maybe, just MAYBE, your idea of "crime" and their idea of "crime" differ at some point in the future.  Didn't you read "1984"?  Technology is neither "good" nor "bad".  It's how it's used that makes it one or the other (or maybe neither).  What you see as a terrific thing NOW may not seem so terrific when at some point, a few years down the road, something you like to do is declared "bad" and they decide to round up, or maybe just keep an eye on, those who participate in it.  What's a better way to keep an eye on folks than having eyes everywhere?

Now do you understand?

Example: 50 years ago cigarettes were popular.  Then they became unpopular.  Then they became shunned.  Then they became unlawful in some designated areas, subject to penalties for infraction.  The natural next step is that they become illegal, period.  Then anyone who smokes is subject to arrest and prosecution.  I don't smoke, but maybe you do, or your wife/husband/friend does. 

Nobody could debate that they're unhealthy, but so could snowboarding be unhealthy.  Want to ban that, and arrest violators?

Back to the point: ubiquitous cameras just make a police state way more convenient to implement.  There is no way I'm going to take the erosion of my personal freedoms lightly.  Is there a potential cost to limiting surveillance?  Sure.  There's a potential cost to crossing the street.  I pay it every day; it's a worthwhile tradeoff for the freedom to live the way I want.

I fear you cannot understand what I am saying.  I am sure you are not alone.  And since the majority rules in Western society, your point of view may well win out.  It happened in Germany in the 1920s-1930s, and it could easily happen again somewhere else.  But I hope not.  I can take solace in this: If it happens, it's not because I didn't point out the dangers.  I spoke out for the communists (actually, I don't like communists, but that's nuance).

Battar
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Tired of Big Brother watching
Battar   5/10/2013 2:38:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Chuck, I do get what you are saying. You are suggesting that law enforcement agencies should be denied a useful tool because other, less benign organizations could use the same tools against you, in some indeterminate future. You could use the same argument to demand that lew enforcement officers not be allowed to carry guns. I choose to disagree, mainly because I am concerned with the present, not just the future, and the risk of my government suddenly denying my basic freedoms, while not impossible, is less than the risk posed to my lifestyle and society by the criminal, and in my case especially,  the terrorist elements. And no, I don't smoke.

bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
SURVEILLANCE GEAR SALES
bobjengr   5/3/2013 9:07:00 PM
NO RATINGS
I think this will be a natural progression after 911 and Boston.  Do we have a choice--I'm not too sure.  The sad fact is all of this effort is after the fact and seemingly; we do NOT have those security mechanisms in place to adequately prevent future Bostons from happening.   Now, what I don't know, is how many tragic events have been stopped as a result of good police work, local and Federal.   I'm sure several if not many.  We will be living in a world in which the only privacy left will be thoughts never uttered nor written.  It's coming then, the media will scream "the public has the right to know".

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Trust / Mistrust of the government
Greg M. Jung   5/3/2013 11:08:28 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe a  big individual decision factor in this debate tends to be each person's trust/mistrust level of our government.  If you trust in our government and believe that it is a good entity that is non-intrusive and protects people, then you may be a proponent of more surveillance cameras to protect us from extremists.  If you mistrust the government and believe that too much surveillance could result in a Orwellian or (or even worse) state then you may be wary of too much intrusion from the government.

At some point, there needs to be a healthy balance between the security of the citizens and the individual privacy and rights of the people.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Those cameras everywhere
William K.   5/4/2013 12:06:21 AM
NO RATINGS
About a year ago, or maybe a bit more, a friend sent a photo showing a huge crowd that was blocks long, at some sort of rally, I think. The suggestion was to zoom in using my computer, which showed that it was possible to recognize faces in the photo that were almost two blocks away just by zooming in enough. That is probably better than most of the best film camers could do. So that kind of technology is already available for those who want to buy it. 

But the enhanced security should be done by the private businesses, not by the government, for two reasons: First, because the government will be wasting money just like they often do, and second, because letting the private businesses do it will avoid letting the government avoid wasting their time and money when there is nothing to see. That is the government way.

Partner Zone
More Blogs
Take a look through these film and TV robots from 1990 through 1994.
The Soofa is an urban smart bench that provides mobile device charging as well as collects environmental information via wireless sensors.
MIT’s Senseable City Lab recently announced the program’s next big project: “Local Warming.” The concept involves saving on energy by heating the occupants within a room, not the room itself.
The fun factor continues to draw developers to Linux. This open-source system continues to succeed in the market and in the hearts and minds of developers. Design News will delve into this territory with next week's Continuing Education Class titled, “Introduction to Linux Device Drivers.”
The new draw-it-on-a-napkin is the CAD program. As CAD programs become more ubiquitous and easier to use, they have replaced 2D sketching for early concepting.
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 4 - 8, Introduction to Linux Device Drivers
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: August 12 - 14
Sponsored by igus
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service