In 2012, the IBM Watson Research Center's 3D transistors featured in the Ivy Bridge design. Researchers worldwide are looking to another medium to take silicon's place -- something that has superior conductivity, produces lower noise, and can operate at astronomical frequencies that silicon could never achieve.
That material is poised to be grapheme -- a one-atom-thick sheet of pure carbon arranged in a honeycomb lattice of bonded carbon atoms. It's relatively hard to produce in large quantities but has an incredibly high electron mobility rate.
Concept of measuring graphene in silicon carbide trenches, ultimately showing a large electrical band-gap. (Source: Georgia Tech)
Attempts to use or implement graphene in electronic components such as transistors has been frustratingly slow. The material's intrinsic physical properties make turning off electrical current flow difficult, which negates the band-gap (on/off state) needed to make the transistor function in a stable manner. A research team led by Dr. Zakaria Moktadir from the University of Southampton overcame this problem in 2011 by introducing sharp bends or corners (singularities) into bilayer graphene nanowires. This enabled the team to control the current in the on/off state. The team etched the singularities into the graphene using a focused gallium-ion beam. However, this method places limits on how small the transistors can become before the band-gap disappears entirely.
This was the challenge presented to research scientists from the Georgia Institute of Technology, who created a stable transistor using narrow nano-ribbons. The team, led by Professor Ed Conrad, got around the band-gap issue by including the singularities in a more simplified fashion.
The process begins by using e-beams (electron beam lithography) to cut small, rough trenches into highly polished silicon-carbide wafers. The wafers are put into a high-temperature furnace. This facilitates the growth of thousands of graphene nano-ribbons across the engraved trenches using photolithography. Light transfers geometric patterns using a photomask (an opaque plate with holes that allow light to pass through) to the light-sensitive chemical resist, acting like a glue.
During the growth process, the nano-trench edges become smooth as the material attempts to cure back into a flat surface. Careful monitoring is critical at this point to keep the wafer from melting and control the growth direction of the nano-ribbons, so they form the steps needed to facilitate the band-gap.
The researchers say this method allowed them to create a band-gap with 0.5 electron-volts in 1.4-nm bent sections of the graphene ribbons. This creates not only a fully functional band-gap in the graphene material, but also the possibility of fabricating an entire circuit out of the graphene material. Their method could be utilized in ultra-fast electronics that use all-carbon integrated circuits in the near future.
Cabe, I wrote that article on CNT toxicity. CNTs are made of graphene, but the toxicity potential is far, far worse with nanomaterials because of their size.
Lou, I've seen the same dialectic again and again between supposed silicon limits about to be reached at X.X process generation and the architectural fixes for same. But one of the main reasons silicon hasn't been replaced yet isn't technical: it's economic, And I don't mean the fact that the material is relatively cheap. The situation is analogous to other potential replacements, like electric and/or hybrid cars, or solar energy, or bioplastics and biofuels: the existing infrastructure is huge, entrenched, pervasive and profitable. Replacing it will take a lot of conscious, united effort, even if the replacing technology works just as well.
Graphene is the future. Forcing a band gap in the material was the crucial step.
However, now that it is poised to be used mainstream, how toxic is the manufacturing process of graphene? I read an article here at DN on nano-tube creation, and its bad. Graphene can't be far behind it.
Cabe, thanks for covering this news from Georgia Tech. Graphene, in various forms including CNTs, has been considered as one possible replacement for silicon for several years. This is a totally cool step forward.
The issue of shrinking transistor size and of stretchability are really two different things.
Over the last many years people have been looking for the replacement for silicon. It is interesting that this has not happened yet. Chip makers continually improve silicon manufactur and density. Other materials generally prove to be of a much lower yield or density or both. Gallium Arsenide was one of those. It could operate at higher speeds, but yield and density were poor.
The solution to reaching limits on clock speed has been architectural. Thus we have multicore machines.
It always seems to be a race between silicon getting better and something else. As you point out in the article, the first theoretical conjecture was in 1947. These things can take a long time before they go from theory to industrial use.
New disc magnet motors fit into the design trend of stepping up to closed loop performance while maintaining the cost advantage of stepper motor technology.
At the Design News webinar on June 27, learn all about aluminum extrusion: designing the right shape so it costs the least, is simplest to manufacture, and best fits the application's structural requirements.
A new battery design, which replaces lithium with abundant and low-cost elemental sulfur, is still in its nascent stages but shows real promise for giving batteries more energy potential.
The push to achieving more intelligent, integrated manufacturing is putting a strong focus on networking and connectivity as key enabling technologies.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 5
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This radio show will show what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.