HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog

Engineering Directives Not Followed... Again

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
DIRECTIVES NOT FOLLOWED
bobjengr   11/23/2012 10:56:28 AM
NO RATINGS
 

CABE-- It's amazing to me how many times in my engineering career I have seen requests for "variations" when specifications were not followed. I think some people (generally management and/or unions) feel we specify components, processes, etc just to fill the day until we clock out.  One thing that also scares me is product coming from vendors not on the "approved" list.   I was asked to investigate a component from a "new low-cost vendor"--completely unapproved by our company, to make sure they met the specifications and had UL approval.  In other words, I was asked to provide the "go-ahead" even if they were close. As it turned out, they were using child labor to manufacture the part; the part was NOT UL approve; the part had questionable fasteners from unapproved sources holding it together.  I said no--I could not approve the component.  In about 3 nanoseconds, I was called into the president's office.  We had what he referred to as a "come to Jesus" moment.   As it turned out, we had components being flown in to our facility, partial payment made and assembly lines waiting to produce.   The solution--take me off the project, put a younger engineer on the job and push ahead.  That's exactly what happened.  I left the company about three months later.    

TunaFish#5
User Rank
Gold
i n c o n c e i v a b l e
TunaFish#5   11/15/2012 9:54:56 AM
NO RATINGS
They pulled 4km of the wrong cable.  When you got them to admit they did this on their own, they then tried to get you to sign a statement saying it was your fault?!?!?!?

How could anyone imagine getting you to sign such a paper in such a situation.

Choice words for these clowns are not suitable for this website.

GTOlover
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Frightening
GTOlover   11/15/2012 9:29:51 AM
I would also point out that contracters like to use a certain cash labor that has no cupability as they "ghost" away.

MarkRW
User Rank
Silver
Unapproved changes
MarkRW   11/15/2012 9:24:03 AM
When issues such as this (incorrect component, not following dwgs etc) arise I tell the persons involved to follow Mil-TFP-41 (Make it like the fine print for once) and let me know the results. Very often the problem goes away.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Frightening
Charles Murray   11/14/2012 6:39:45 PM
NO RATINGS
My thought exactly, Tekochip. Unrecognized and unreported changes have a way of rearing their heads at the wrong time.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Frightening
Cabe Atwell   11/14/2012 12:53:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Having designed alarm, fire, and security systems, I have seen this type of work shirking in many places. Sometime they luck out, and it works ok. Then when the above story goes down, I get blamed. It's very stressful at times. Especially when the workers demand I sign off on their work.

C

 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Frightening
Ann R. Thryft   11/14/2012 12:52:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow, this really is scary. Presumably there were part numbers to choose from, so the contractors chose the wrong part number--why, to save money? Or because they really were incompetent? I can envision both. This makes me wonder about the general tendency I've heard of--and many have commented about on the DN site--to get less educated, less technically proficient people, who are also cheaper, to do supposedly less technical work--like installation--that supposedly doesn't require actual engineers since no actual engineering is involved.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Frightening
tekochip   11/14/2012 11:47:18 AM
It makes you worry about component substitutions in places that have not been detected......yet.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
"Design Problems"
Nancy Golden   11/14/2012 9:56:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Amazing how many "design problems" are solved by going back and using the parts that were originally specified by the engineer...not surprising that this happened but you would think that with such an arduous task (that was a lot of wiring!) they would have checked first...

Partner Zone
More Blogs
The promise of the Internet of Things (IoT) is that devices, gadgets, and appliances we use every day will be able to communicate with one another. This potential is not limited to household items or smartphones, but also things we find in our yard and garden, as evidenced by a recent challenge from the element14 design community.
Researchers have developed a new flexible fabric that integrates both movement and sensors, introducing new potential for technology-embedded clothing and soft robots.
If you didn't realize that PowerPoint presentations are inherently hilarious, you have to see Don McMillan take one apart. McMillan -- aka the Technically Funny Comic -- worked for 10 years as an engineer before he switched to stand-up comedy.
The first Tacoma Narrows Bridge was a Washington State suspension bridge that opened in 1940 and spanned the Tacoma Narrows strait of Puget Sound between Tacoma and the Kitsap Peninsula. It opened to traffic on July 1, 1940, and dramatically collapsed into Puget Sound on November 7, just four months after it opened.
Noting that we now live in an era of “confusion and ill-conceived stuff,” Ammunition design studio founder Robert Brunner, speaking at Gigaom Roadmap, said that by adding connectivity to everything and its mother, we aren't necessarily doing ourselves any favors, with many ‘things’ just fine in their unconnected state.
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service