HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog

Humans, Do You Speak !~+V•&T1F0()?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Software for Nuclear power stations
Mydesign   10/8/2012 12:16:24 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Teknochip, you mean to shut down all the operating systems and software before dismantling the entire system. In that case you can control only the machinery part, nothing to deal with the dangerous nuclear fission/fusion parts.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Human-Robot communications
William K.   10/7/2012 8:00:11 PM
NO RATINGS
What it sounds like is that the robot will be deciding what it will do, or what it wants to do, and telling the human. That will take a whole lot more brains than robots presently have. The problem seems to be that the humans in the situation would not have enough understanding of the situation to make correct judgements. The condition of inadequate operator understanding and insight is tracable to not having an adequate operator, usually because of not respecting the skills needed for the task.

The concept of robots communicating to do some task is quite interesting, but here is a need for caution, since the understanding of separation between robots may also lead to robot self-awareness. So we need to be aware of what is being done in the field of autonomous robotics, to avoid creating the situations that have been the subject of science fiction  for many years. It does have the potential to be far worse than those stories ever predicted.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: C-3PO
Ann R. Thryft   10/5/2012 11:55:51 AM
NO RATINGS
Lou, I get it--thanks for the C3PO reference. I can hear his voice in my head right now, and see him chasing after R2D2, sounding like a worried nanny.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Smart robots
Ann R. Thryft   10/5/2012 11:54:55 AM
NO RATINGS
I've read the same statistic you mention, Chuck, but I'd like to know more about the specific situations. Driving a car mostly consists of understandable, easily repeatable motions. Making decisions about what to do if a truck suddenly turns around in your lane and comes back at you is a very different set of problems and decision-making. I'm giving that example because it's something completely unexpected (something similar happened to me once at 60 mph in the fast lane). In any case, something completely unexpected that the remote human can't see very well--i.e., inside a Fukushima reactor--and that needs to be done right the first time requires complex, highly sophisticated decision-making skills, and very good communication between robot and remote human. The researchers think that the ability to communicate thoroughly before and during complex, dangerous tasks, like two people would, is a good idea.

ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Smart robots
ttemple   10/5/2012 10:12:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Charles,

I don't really get the point of this either.  If I am understanding the article, it sounds like they expect the robot to do things that the observers would have trouble figuring out.  If the algorithms are that complex, it looks like the programmers would implement logging, or some trail of breadcrumbs to discern why the robot is doing what it is doing.

 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Smart robots
Charles Murray   10/4/2012 8:52:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm a little surpised to hear that the robot's creators would be anticipating so much difficulty and confusion. The robotic driving systems developed by Google have been nearly flawless, despite the fact they have to deal with unpredictable humans. I recently read that Google cars have had only one accident after logging 250,000 miles, and that happened when a human driver decided to take the wheel.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Software for Nuclear power stations
Ann R. Thryft   10/4/2012 12:03:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Beth, this is text to logic symbols and back: no audio. As we mentioned, humans communicate with the robot via a keyboard (at least during the remote operation). Although the sources didn't specify, my guess is the humans see the robot's translated symbols-to-text on a screen. The big deal is being able to communicate in detail to a remote robot at a much more sophisticated level than was possible before. So instead of just being the humans' eyes and perhaps hands--or bomb zappers--like many of the military and rescue robots we've covered, this can let the humans stay at a distance. At Fukushima, all they could do was check and report back. Humans still had to go in to the high-rad area and decommission it. With this, they won't have to.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Software for Nuclear power stations
Ann R. Thryft   10/4/2012 12:01:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Mydesign, the software is not used to dismantle the power plant. The software is used to help humans and robots communicate ahead of time and during such a delicate operation, to make sure everything goes right. What other kinds of developments did you have in mind?

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Software for Nuclear power stations
Beth Stackpole   10/4/2012 11:12:31 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with Tekochip; it seems like another way of translating machine algorthims into human-friendly text so data regarding the environment or instructional information can be passed back and forth. There's no spoken component to these systems, is there?? Not to say this isn't valuable or interesting, BTW.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
C-3PO
naperlou   10/4/2012 10:54:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Ann, you know what this reminds me of?  C-3PO from Star Wars.  That was a robot that communicated between robots and humans.  It spoke millions of languages, including many machine languages. 

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs
Engineer comic Don McMillan explains the fun engineers have with team-building exercises. Can you relate?
The damage to Sony from the cyber attack seems to have been heightened by failure to follow two basic security rules.
Reshoring is picking up steam, but it's not outpacing the overall continuing growth in outsourcing.
Here's a variety of views into the complex production processes at Santa's factory. Happy Holidays!
The Beam Store from Suitable Technologies is managed by remote workers from places as diverse as New York and Sydney, Australia. Employees attend to store visitors through Beam Smart Presence Systems (SPSs) from the company. The systems combine mobility and video conferencing and allow people to communicate directly from a remote location via a screen as well as move around as if they are actually in the room.
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 12 - 16, Programmable Logic - How do they do that?
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service