HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog
Video: Flexible Robot Hands Get Cheaper
9/21/2012

Sandia National Laboratories has created a low-cost, highly dexterous robotic hand to aid soldiers in disarming improvised explosive devices. (Source: Randy Montoya/Sandia National Labs)
Sandia National Laboratories has created a low-cost, highly dexterous robotic hand
to aid soldiers in disarming improvised explosive devices.
(Source: Randy Montoya/Sandia National Labs)

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/2  >  >>
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Talk about impressive Dexterity
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   9/24/2012 6:23:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Article states: "Traditionally $10,000 for each independently actuated degree of freedom, The Sandia Hand, costs about $800 per degree and  has 12 degrees of freedom".  Guessing that means each of four fingers is two degrees (one per joint), plus wrist rotate, plus wrist bend, plus elbow and plus shoulder equals twelve.  (My guess).  This entire robotic arm at $9600, is affordable for such a sophisticated piece of technology.  Compare that to the prior (traditional) estimate at  $120,000 for what we are seeing and the benefits become quite clear. TJ took the words right out of my mouth: first I was impressed, then I was amazed.  It dropped a AA battery into a flashlight.  THAT's dexterity sufficient to diffuse a bomb.

Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: What is different
Jack Rupert, PE   9/24/2012 3:24:51 PM
NO RATINGS
I wouldn't get too caught up in the magnetic attachment.  That really seems to be a separate feature for specific applications where 1) force limitation is vital and 2) dropping a finger isn't going to cause other issues.

In addition to the other suggestions posted, I could see a few generations down the pike focusing on scalability.  Same concept, for example, for microsurgery except 1/10 the size and the operator is using a zoomed-in video feedback.

Just wish the video would have shown more of the glove control mentioned in the article.  There was just a brief glance at the end. It seems that there is an added layer of complexity for the user, though, since there are only 3 fingers.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What is different
Ann R. Thryft   9/24/2012 12:37:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Nadine, I agree about the weight issue, especially since the fingers are attached magnetically. The fingers' ability to fall off instead of break means--that they can fall off. OTOH, how much weight they will be dealing with when performing delicate IED disarming tasks may be a moot point. Their design seems to be aimed more at delicately picking up small objects, like the key, than at dealing with weight.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Other applicatons for Flexible Robot Hands
Ann R. Thryft   9/24/2012 12:36:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Scott, I've also noticed how much robotics funding is coming from DARPA and various branches of the US military. A bit unnerving, perhaps, but still intriguing to see what they're coming up with.

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: What is different
NadineJ   9/23/2012 11:09:15 AM
NO RATINGS
From what I can see in the video, weight is an issue for this hand.  The receiver of the princess phone was picked up but not the base.  Even the case, which seemed heavy, was almost dragged by the handle.  The ability to carry heavier weight may be a key difference for price.

Magnetic attachments for the fingers are a great example of design thinking.  I wonder how they'll solve the problem of the fingers flipping back (very noticeable in the video).

Scott Orlosky
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Other applicatons for Flexible Robot Hands
Scott Orlosky   9/22/2012 10:42:01 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a pretty neat development.  What a clever approach to a robotic hand design.  Interesting that this came out of Darpa - it seems that all the financing for robotic development is coming out of the government these days.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Feedback
TJ McDermott   9/21/2012 3:41:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Holy cow, this is impressive!  From the detachable fingers, to the amazing dexterity, this is a great development.  I was impressed right up to the key pick-up, after that I was amazed.

The key pickup does hightlight one aspect that will require some more effort - feedback.  Trying to pick up something without having the force feedback creates a sense of separation and isolation.  Getting pressure feedback from the fingers to the operator's glove interface is the next big challenge.

 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Other applicatons for Flexible Robot Hands
Ann R. Thryft   9/21/2012 2:21:21 PM
NO RATINGS
mrdon, I think those are interesting apps you mention. Of course, the materials would have to be designed specifically for use in those specialized environments: with hazardous chemicals and for the vacuum of space. Interestingly, the GM Robo-Glove my colleague Chuck Murray wrote about earlier this year http://www.designnews.com/document.asp?doc_id=240915 was derived from NASA's humanoid space robot Robonaut 2, which is up in the space station and one of whose tasks will be conducting EVA (extra-vehicular activity) dangerous operations.

mrdon
User Rank
Gold
Other applicatons for Flexible Robot Hands
mrdon   9/21/2012 2:13:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Ann, Great article!  I see variety of applications for which the Sandia Hand can be used in addition to bomb detonation. One application I see this hand being quite useful is in working with hazardous chemicals. A scientist will not need the protective gear when handling hazardous chemicals, the Sandia Hand could be used. The scientist can work remotely and manipulate the chemicals using the gloves to control the handling process. Also, the International Space station can make outside repairs with these flexible hands as well.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What is different
Ann R. Thryft   9/21/2012 12:38:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Lou, it looks to me like the key means of driving down costs were making an effort to do so. Since these are aimed at the military, costs had to be low, and there was a concerted effort to reach that goal. As we state in the article, this was the effort in partnership with the consulting firm LUNAR to "select motors, research skin-simulating materials, perform cost-of-goods and cost reduction analyses, and research design-for-manufacturing considerations." What I'm curious about is the opposite: if this can be done by a concerted effort, why the heck have they been so expensive before? My guess is that earlier robotic hands were developed either for fundamental research, or for very high-end low-volume uses.

Page 1/2  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs
A soundproofing invention called Acoustiblok recently won a television challenge to silence an air horn with only a fraction of an inch of polymer material.
Robots came into their own in the 1970s. Gone were the low-budget black-and-white B movies. Now robots roamed in full-color feature films with A-list actors.
Major global metropolitan areas are implementing a vast number of technology, energy, transportation, and Internet projects to make the metropolis a friendlier, greener, safer, and more sustainable place to be.
Here’s a look at robots depicted in movies and on TV during the 1950s and 1960s. We tried to collect the classics here, omitting the scores of forgettable B movies such as Santa Claus Conquers the Martians and Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine. Stay tuned for slideshows of robot stars from later decades.
A scientist at the University of Pittsburgh has achieved a breakthrough in the quest to create artificial cartilage with human cells for treatment of degenerative joint disease.
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 21 - 25, Design Products With Bluetooth Low Energy
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: August 12 - 14
Sponsored by igus
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service