Jack, autonomous swarming behavior is very different from multiple UAVs controlled by multiple people; the swarming bots are often capable of making their own decisions about how to carry out a mission among themselves. Check out the links we give for more info. This is a different world.
Thanks Ann, for such an interesting post , no doubt these days autonomous UAVs swarming have become very popular . With every technology we have pros and cons associated with it but what I think is because of the government regulations these UAVS cant be that harmfull on the contrary these swarming UAVS can be a great help for the defense and millitary system.
I wouldn't worry so much about 'swarms' of autonomous drones making strafing runs on targets so much, as there seems to be a lot of them falling out of the skies lately. They should probably perfect their flying skills first.
I'm not sure I see the concern about swarming with these bigger units. (The micro robots in "Prey" are a different story). How is that much different than having individually controlled UAV's with auto-pilot turned on? Instead of a group of people trying to synchronize their movements to achieve a co-ordinated effort it can now be done by a single operator. Actually, any cooridinated air attach could be considered a swarm, its just the number of people that need to be involved (and therefore the number of chances for operator error).
TJ, sounds like you don't relish seeing lots of these in the skies. Your comment make me think of the swarming robots in Michael Crichton's novel Prey, although those were, of course, much smaller nanobots. But the question is similar: what happens if they get out of control? Do we all watch/read too much sci-fi? I'm never sure...
Interesting app, Thinking_J. I'm familiar with the general problem you mention, but in much denser areas than 2 people per sq mi. Search and rescue is one of the apps I've seen mentioned for autonomous swarming UAVs and flying robots. I don't see why it couldn't be applied to wider areas.
UAV swarms would certainly offer a great deal of potential for search and rescue operations, that does seem like a very good application indeed. But then the next stage of evolution, in warfare, would be just like the airplane: first, for observation, and next as an additional weapon. A swarm of armed drones would be quite an effective way to support ground troops, but it would have the terrible risk of being tricked by the enemy. GPS "spoofing", and other methoids of misleading, have all ready been found and demonstrated to work. So there are quite a few potential serious hazards associated with such a swarm technology, since the swarm must communicate to function. The inter-element communications links are the weakest points in swarm technology, and should not be ignored. That is the place where defense against a swarm could be made.
Most cyber attacks could be avoided by adopting a list of Critical Security Controls that were created by the Center for Internet Security. Thatís the message from Steve Mustard of the Automation Federation.
George Leopold's talk at last week's Design & Manufacturing Minneapolis helped restore astronaut and engineer Gus Grissom's role in the beginnings of NASA, and outlined how Grissom played a pivotal role in winning the Space Race.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies.
You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived.
So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.