Japan Defense Ministry Spins Flying Spherical Robot

View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Page 1/2  >  >>
Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Flying robot orb and the plant floor
Beth Stackpole   11/11/2011 7:48:06 AM
Yet another great example of out-of-the-box thinking leading to some pretty cool designs. I like the idea you posed, Ann, of how industrial engineers should be thinking in terms of adapting similar capabilities to address hard to reach places on assembly lines or elsewhere on the factory floor. There's likely a lot of great applications there.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Low cost, off the shelf
Dave Palmer   11/11/2011 4:58:40 PM
What's really amazing to me is that they built this for under $1500 with off the shelf components. At that price, we should be seeing these all over the place. I'm tempted to comment that if the U.S. military made this, it would cost at least $1.5 million, use all custom components, and not work. But it seems unnecessary to point that out. Still, not bad for a country which is constitutionally banned from having a military, huh?

User Rank
pictures at 11?
Nugent_56   11/14/2011 9:12:48 AM
I would have liked to seen a picture of the Orb and not the American model they are comparing it to.

William K.
User Rank
Japanese "spherical" flying robot.
William K.   11/14/2011 11:09:23 AM
The photo shohs that it is not really anything remarkable, but that a sperical frame has been placed around a more traditional flying platform. So while there are indeed a few advantages to this shape, it is certainly not a "revolutionary breakthrough". It is an interesting concept. and probably one that could be adapted to some of our current UAVs and provide a benefit. But aside from the spherical framwork, it really did not look that advanced. Probably similar devices, more of the toy quality though, could be found in some of the Chinese export catalogs.

REmember that what makes our military stuff so expensive is the amount of documentation  and the fact that tactical items must be far more reliable than any consumer item could ever dream of being. And verifiable reliability is not cheap.

User Rank
Re: Japanese "spherical" flying robot.
Watashi   11/14/2011 3:13:49 PM
I agree, it is an incremental improvement over current micro UAV technology at best.  But some of the best functionality comes because of simple improvements to current designs.

Making this prototype mil-spec and productized could easily add 10s of thousands to the unit cost. The test and qualification program, that would have to be amatorized or contracted separately, would cost over $100K.  Add another $100K to $200K if it is weaponized or used in targeting.  This, of course, assumes no requirement changes well into development propting a major redesign. The long DoD acquisition cycle leaves plenty of time for requirements creep. Most outside the defense industry have difficultly understanding the economics of working in the government monopsony.

User Rank
Re: pictures at 11?
Watashi   11/14/2011 3:15:59 PM
You have to use the video link

User Rank
Better vision.. not so easy
Thinking_J   11/14/2011 4:45:55 PM
Per ..."there's no reason a small, higher-performing camera couldn't be mounted on-board."

Yes there is a reason, several reasons in fact.

Better camera.. means much higher bandwidth for the radio link. OLD standard video requires ~3.5mhz bandwidth.. HD quality requires a compression and additional bandwidth. Which means much higher power requirements...Not so easy on a product where weight is critical.

And for a product viewing from high in the air.. HD with advanced optics and stabilization (to get the most from the platform) makes the job even harder.

assuming a reasonable flight time is still required... (30-60minutes?)

It will happen.. but it isn't so easy or cheap at this time.


Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Another flying device
Alexander Wolfe   11/14/2011 8:32:53 PM
Apropos of this, check out the German "e-volo." Not a robot -- it's an electric helicopter (ok, multicopter). But it's the same basic idea in that there's incremental improvements to existing technology coupled with macro-level questions about utility. Here's the link: http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=1362&doc_id=235367

User Rank
Re: Flying robot orb and the plant floor
jmiller   11/14/2011 10:58:50 PM
Neat to see a solution like this where the answer isn't what you expect.  Rathe than the typical design that we would all expect.  Someone says why not design it in this shape. 

I agree that taking a look at the solution without the typical constraints or idea of the soluition before the work has begun can result in some neat solutions that might just revolutionize the industry.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
How will this be used?
Rob Spiegel   11/15/2011 9:39:06 AM
Cool video. The gadget is relatively inexpensive. Do you know if that was designed to solve a specific problem? What are some of the applications this might be used for? Military drone. Spy device? I know the Japanese military is fairly limited. Was this designed for use by other armed forces -- such as the United States?

Page 1/2  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs
McLaren is one of the biggest names in auto racing. But now it has its eyes on a whole new challenge -- innovating healthcare.
PTC will stream its LiveWrox IoT conference for free beginning Tuesday, May 5.
At some point in the distant future, we may all be driving electric cars. Until then, however, the debate over their ongoing viability rages on.
The choice between helical and spur gears in gearboxes may seem straightforward. But with planetary gearboxes, however, the choice between helical and spur gears requires some additional thought. Here’s what you need to know to make the right choice.
With outsourcing down and reshoring up, the US saw a net gain of 10,000 manufacturing jobs that would have gone overseas last year.
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service