Contrary to what I thought going into it, I’ve discovered that it’s not yet all that easy or cost effective to be really green, at least when it comes to being electrically self sufficient (at least in my neighborhood). The past few weeks I set off to try to look at how I could self generate a good chunk of the electric power for my house. This is part one of a two part blog on green power. Why not wind? My house sits on the top of a hill with, what I’ve thought was, typically a steady breeze. Now it turns out that my house uses on average about 24,000 kWh per year. At an average rate 10.5 cents per kWh, electricity costs me over $2,500 per year. Like most the usage, it significantly increases during the summer months. For wind, there is up to a 30% tax credit but the formula gets a bit complicated because it is a combination of the rated capacity of your wind system and how much you actually paid. This means that if you overpay for little capacity, your credit won’t be very large. In addition, it appears that my local utility may also provide another 20% (or so) credit. In addition to the potential credit, one of the nicest things about being tied to a utility is that there is no need to get a bunch of batteries or charge controllers. Both wind and solar have grid tied systems, which means that if you don’t generate enough power for your home, you can still buy some from the utility and if you make too much, you can generally sell the surplus back to the utility.
In the quest for wind turbines, there appears to be three important factors: your average wind speed, building and zoning rules and, of course, whether or not you neighbors will be happy with a giant wind turbine over the house. First, with respect to zoning, it will vary much by municipality. In my city, I couldn’t find any explicit restrictions on neighborhood wind turbines. However, I did find that that the limit to free structures, not connected to the house, was 15 feet and the limit to a structure connected to or as part of my house could be no taller than 40 feet. With a 27 foot house, I have 13 feet to spare if I didn’t want the wind turbine to be obstructed. Next was wind speed. By surveying the national weather service, I was able to discover the average wind speed on my street was 10 miles per hour. At first that sounded to me like quite a bit, but I soon learned I really could use more wind. As far as the neighbors, if they protested, I would use the “I’m protecting the planet for my children” argument. In my quest for a wind turbine, I found the Skystream 3.7 for about $8,000. The turbine itself costs a bit less, but you need to mount it to something. At 12 feet in diameter and a rating of 1,800 watts, it appeared to have a nice bit of power. Then reality hit. The table below illustrates a model at different AVERAGE wind speeds. The focus here is on average because wind never just blows at a constant speed over the course of a year and the efficiency of the turbine actually goes down when the wind gets above 30 mph.
Wind mph
Efficiency
kWH/yr
Avg Watts
8
8%
1300
148
10
17%
2700
308
15
43%
6800
776
20
57%
9000
1027
25
65%
10200
1164
To get a good amount of power, you really need wind close to 20 mph, with the best being between 25 and 30 mph. At an average of 10 mph, the real output about is 300 watts, yielding a paltry 2700 kWh per year - 11% of my power needs. After the 30% tax credit, the cost of $5,600 would have a payback period of about 20 years. Not good for my neighborhood, so I guess my neighbors won’t get to enjoy the 12 foot turbine above my house. However, if I lived in a windy place of 20 mph wind, the payback is only 6 years.
Gigabit and PoE are two networking technologies moving ahead in tandem as industrial users power remote Ethernet devices such as IP security cameras at 1,000 Mbps over existing CAT5 cable.
New disc magnet motors fit into the design trend of stepping up to closed loop performance while maintaining the cost advantage of stepper motor technology.
At the Design News webinar on June 27, learn all about aluminum extrusion: designing the right shape so it costs the least, is simplest to manufacture, and best fits the application's structural requirements.
A new battery design, which replaces lithium with abundant and low-cost elemental sulfur, is still in its nascent stages but shows real promise for giving batteries more energy potential.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 5
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This radio show will show what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.