Contrary to what I thought going into it, I’ve discovered that it’s not yet all that easy or cost effective to be really green, at least when it comes to being electrically self sufficient (at least in my neighborhood). The past few weeks I set off to try to look at how I could self generate a good chunk of the electric power for my house. This is part one of a two part blog on green power. Why not wind? My house sits on the top of a hill with, what I’ve thought was, typically a steady breeze. Now it turns out that my house uses on average about 24,000 kWh per year. At an average rate 10.5 cents per kWh, electricity costs me over $2,500 per year. Like most the usage, it significantly increases during the summer months. For wind, there is up to a 30% tax credit but the formula gets a bit complicated because it is a combination of the rated capacity of your wind system and how much you actually paid. This means that if you overpay for little capacity, your credit won’t be very large. In addition, it appears that my local utility may also provide another 20% (or so) credit. In addition to the potential credit, one of the nicest things about being tied to a utility is that there is no need to get a bunch of batteries or charge controllers. Both wind and solar have grid tied systems, which means that if you don’t generate enough power for your home, you can still buy some from the utility and if you make too much, you can generally sell the surplus back to the utility.
In the quest for wind turbines, there appears to be three important factors: your average wind speed, building and zoning rules and, of course, whether or not you neighbors will be happy with a giant wind turbine over the house. First, with respect to zoning, it will vary much by municipality. In my city, I couldn’t find any explicit restrictions on neighborhood wind turbines. However, I did find that that the limit to free structures, not connected to the house, was 15 feet and the limit to a structure connected to or as part of my house could be no taller than 40 feet. With a 27 foot house, I have 13 feet to spare if I didn’t want the wind turbine to be obstructed. Next was wind speed. By surveying the national weather service, I was able to discover the average wind speed on my street was 10 miles per hour. At first that sounded to me like quite a bit, but I soon learned I really could use more wind. As far as the neighbors, if they protested, I would use the “I’m protecting the planet for my children” argument. In my quest for a wind turbine, I found the Skystream 3.7 for about $8,000. The turbine itself costs a bit less, but you need to mount it to something. At 12 feet in diameter and a rating of 1,800 watts, it appeared to have a nice bit of power. Then reality hit. The table below illustrates a model at different AVERAGE wind speeds. The focus here is on average because wind never just blows at a constant speed over the course of a year and the efficiency of the turbine actually goes down when the wind gets above 30 mph.
To get a good amount of power, you really need wind close to 20 mph, with the best being between 25 and 30 mph. At an average of 10 mph, the real output about is 300 watts, yielding a paltry 2700 kWh per year - 11% of my power needs. After the 30% tax credit, the cost of $5,600 would have a payback period of about 20 years. Not good for my neighborhood, so I guess my neighbors won’t get to enjoy the 12 foot turbine above my house. However, if I lived in a windy place of 20 mph wind, the payback is only 6 years.
In this new Design News feature, "How it Works," we’re starting off by examining the inner workings of the electronic cigarette. While e-cigarettes seemed like a gimmick just two or three years ago, they’re catching fire -- so to speak. Sales topped $1 billion last year and are set to hit $10 billion by 2017. Cigarette companies are fighting back by buying up e-cigarette manufacturers.
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
Some humanoid walking robots are also good at running, balancing, and coordinated movements in group settings. Several of our sports robots have won regional or worldwide acclaim in the RoboCup soccer World Cup, or FIRST Robotics competitions. Others include the world's first hockey-playing robot and a trash-talking Scrabble player.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.