When I was a freshman engineering student at the University of Southern California in 1982, I got to go on a tour of TRW’s Space Division where I saw one of the first GPS satellites being assembled. We were told that this technology was going to revolutionize navigation. Yet I couldn’t help but wonder how the satellites would know where I was. Today that thought reminds me of a trip to the mall when my children were very young. We looked at the mall map and found the label saying, “You are here” and my son asked me how the mall people knew where we were.
So goes the world of GPS. GPS technology has evolved over the past 27 years and become much more accurate. Nonetheless, the basic principle remains the same and you don’t have to be an RF expert or a math wizard to understand it. With GPS, most of the satellites know very little except the exact time. The GPS unit you hold in your hand or in your car has all the smarts. The simple version of GPS, without any of the fancy corrections follows basic geometry.
It goes like this. Say you know that you are a distance of 100 miles from a point of known location, even if you know nothing about direction, then you know you are someplace on a sphere with a radius of 100 miles from that point. Now, let’s say you know that you are 100 miles from one point and 50 miles from a different known point. In this case your location is a point which is common among two spheres of radios 100 miles and 50 miles respectively. Since the intersection of two spheres is a circle, you know you are some place on that circle. Finally, let’s add a third point. Using the same logic you know your location is the intersection of three spheres. Geometrically speaking, the intersection of three spheres is exactly one point. So all your GPS receiver does is calculate the distance from satellites of known location by measuring the delay in the time-stamped signals from the satellites, then calculating your point location by intersecting spheres. Now because this measurement is not perfect, we add extra satellites to reduce the error and provide a time reference. All you really need to know is basic geometry.
Almost every automaker has had to 'pick a side' when it comes to alternative fuel options and ways to divest from a reliance on gasoline. Fiat is looking to back compressed natural gas or liquid propane as an interim solution.
Plastic may not be the most beloved of materials to the more environmentally minded, but Plasti 2012 aimed to mold a different opinion of the material in people's minds.
The rare earth element market has become steadily more rational, and new sources coming online will continue to reduce costs. Still, it is unlikely that prices will drop to their former lows.
Against a backdrop of mounting product complexity and a need to keep a lid on development costs, companies are recognizing a need to make simulation a more integral part of the design process. In response, vendors in the CAD world are building out CAE functionality as part of their CAD suites while simulation vendors are building tighter integrations to leading CAD tools. Keith Meintjes, Ph.D., Practice Manager, Simulation and Analysis at CIMdata, Inc., joins Design News CAD Editor Beth Stackpole in this radio program to explore the new face of integrated CAD and CAE, how companies are benefitting from this tighter partnership between platforms, and how integrating CAE earlier in the development cycle pays off in optimized product designs.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.