My friend and colleague Rob Weisman at the Boston Globe just wrote a splendid feature headlined Warship 2.0 on the systems development behind the DDG 1000 Zumwalt guided missile destroyer. While the Navy is attempting to lower the heart-stopping $3.3 billion pricetag to build the initial versions of the technically-advanced warship, its proponents say that in today’s dollars the present Arleigh Burke class of destroyers that have been built for the past 20 years cost about $2.4 billion a copy. So, the Navy argues, taxpayers are getting a spanking new destroyer for just under $1 billion more than it cost for the last few Arleigh Burke’s going down the ways (actually, they are floated in a big moveable drydock when launched. The last destroyer to go down the ways slid lengthwise into the water more than two years ago.)
Sixty Arleigh Burkes have been built so far and the Bath Iron Works (BIW) in Bath, Maine, one of two U.S. yards that builds the vessel, is working on its last six Arleigh Burkes, the last of which will be launched in 2010. I have something of a vested interest in BIW given that my summer home is perched on the Kennebec River a mere quarter of a mile away. Rob also wrote a sidebar on BIW talking about the ups and downs of a yard umbilically attached to Navy contracts. BIW is trying to diversify into private shipbuilding and is going after a contract worth as much as $2.5 billion to build Fast Cutters for the Coast Guard.
Known for building high quality vessels that often come in under cost and ahead of schedule, BIW should have a good shot at the CG contract. That’s the inside word, anyway.
Almost every automaker has had to 'pick a side' when it comes to alternative fuel options and ways to divest from a reliance on gasoline. Fiat is looking to back compressed natural gas or liquid propane as an interim solution.
Plastic may not be the most beloved of materials to the more environmentally minded, but Plasti 2012 aimed to mold a different opinion of the material in people's minds.
The rare earth element market has become steadily more rational, and new sources coming online will continue to reduce costs. Still, it is unlikely that prices will drop to their former lows.
Against a backdrop of mounting product complexity and a need to keep a lid on development costs, companies are recognizing a need to make simulation a more integral part of the design process. In response, vendors in the CAD world are building out CAE functionality as part of their CAD suites while simulation vendors are building tighter integrations to leading CAD tools. Keith Meintjes, Ph.D., Practice Manager, Simulation and Analysis at CIMdata, Inc., joins Design News CAD Editor Beth Stackpole in this radio program to explore the new face of integrated CAD and CAE, how companies are benefitting from this tighter partnership between platforms, and how integrating CAE earlier in the development cycle pays off in optimized product designs.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.