If you've remained a technical contributor, eschewing the climb up the corporate ladder, are you happy with your decision? That's the question we posed this month to members of our LinkedIn systems and product design engineering group. We also wondered what the biggest thing those of you who've remained in the tech trenches would like to see changed about the way managers relate to you.
Consulting engineer Robert Sander Sr. has no regrets about his decision:
I spent four years as a manager and hated it all the time. I am much happier as a technical subject matter expert and acknowledged leader of technology in my field. I prefer working on my own, but must have direction from my manager to make sure my goals are aligned with what the company wants and needs. I love what I do and don't regret ever making the switch to technical.
According to consultant William Ketel II, "The sense of personal achievement that comes with a successful design is quite a reward, and that does make me happy. I can't imagine doing anything else that would be so rewarding that I would get paid for."
Lest we assume that management and engineering are discrete functions, Ketel reminds us of the contrary. When he was chief engineer at a startup, he saw himself as being on the engineering side because he was "the one ultimately responsible for everything." After that startup cratered, his experience with his manager at a subsequent job wasn't so sanguine:
When one [manager] makes it clear that they regard all engineers as interchangeable commodity resources, moral suffers, loyalty is damaged, and the engineers leave. I am at a loss as to how MBA accountants can design electronic vehicle systems.
Design engineer Chuck Blevins picks up that point:
I stopped being a manager and went back to the technical side. From my experience, a good manager allows the technical side to make technical decisions and keeps upper management informed, but out of [it]. Managers who want to make technical decisions do the project a disservice.
"Good managers give the people who work with them the tools to do their jobs and then leave them alone, but with frequent communications to keep everyone on track," said our own contributing technical editor Jon Titus.
Going back to being a technical contributor was the best thing he ever did, according to mechanical engineer Chris Pollard:
[I] decided that being a manager was a dangerous occupation. Your job depended on who you worked for -- not what you knew. So I just kept learning more 'stuff,' using old tricks and shortcuts and adding to them. Nothing beats designing a new machine that goes into production or solving a major engineering problem.
I know we need management. Someone has to absorb the profits I create. But I was born to be an engineer and I love it! I don't mind managing technical people to help me do the work. Heck, I don't even mind having a nontechnical person on the team fetching things, issuing POs, selling stuff, cleaning the building, dealing with UPS, creating advertising, and so on. We need to offer livelihood to others. It's the Christian thing to do. But I don't want to run the company. I want to be an engineer. Just tell me what you have in mind to offer to the marketplace, give me to tools I need and a budget to break, and I'm in heaven.
Alex, many years ago, at GE, there was an issue with manager vs engineer. We were promoting people to management so that we could pay them what they were worth, but they really didn't (and in some cases couldn't) manage. So, a parallel set of titles was created to parallel all management levels up to Director (just below VP). This worked really well. And at the top level, Engineering Fellow, the pay was quite high. I was in both types of roles at various times. I preferred the Staff Engineer role.
As for the comment from an manager that engineers were interchangable, that is obviously not correct (I was thinking about saying something else). The performance of a design or piece of software or firmware can varry by a factor of over 10,000, depending on how it is designed. I would want the guy who could figure out how to come out on the high end of that curve. Of course, every once in a while I saw engineers who could not design a subsystem correctly. They were alwasy failing the "smoke test". They generally got fired.
Finally, I do see, fairly often, people who own or run a business and are very creative. Becuase they spend too much time on the design part their business suffers. This is the other side of the coin.
Engineers or creatives who can manage effectively have a special combination of talents that most people just don't have.
Most designers and engineers are doers. They like to be in the trenches. And, frankly, some have too much ego to manage others and allow someone who may even be more talented/created to grow. A good manager may not know exactly how it works but does know who the right people are to get it done. The quote in the article from Chuck Blevinssays it best from my experience.
To naperlou's point, it's not one vs the other. Both are needed for success.
I would say both the job is tough, since Engineer's job is to planing, designing and implementing whereas Manager's job it to arrange all the thing according to particular engineer. So both carry eual importance.
1-Gives proper and honest credit as due. 2-Manages people by asking them the right questions. 3-Foresees problems before they become problems. 4-Divides the workload fairly to promote individual growth.
Technical people tend to have a different skill set than do good managers. We do well with things, and we are less adept at the "people" things. Its not a bad thing, its just what makes us good at what we do. We can work with the specs of a bunch of different components and jury rig a fix until the right parts come in, we can listen to some obscure and intermittant sound and tell someone which wire to wiggle, or bolt to tighten. But people can drive us nuts!
The problem with most managers is that they don't have much knowledge of what we do, or why. But a good manager can handle the peole side of things and enjoy it and be fulfilled. Just like an engineer can when the project it finally works perfectly and teh customer is delighted with the end result.
If you can get a manager that has the great people skills, but has been trained in some of the field which he is managing, it is a wonderful experience.
While sitting in my cube one day at a local govt (military) contractor who shall remain nameless I was on the phone with a hardware (screw) supplier. In the mean time the director of R&D walked up and was waiting for me to finish the call. I mentioned to the person on the phone "six thirty two screw". When I finished the call the first thing the "director" asked me was "what does six thirty two mean?"
He was about 3 pay grades above me.
Obviously he was smarter than me because he was MY boss and not vise versa. I've never been able to figure out what I've been doing wrong all these years.
On top of that "engineers" aways do all the work and the "directors" generally get the credit when the thing works and transfer the blame when the thing doesn't.
On the other hand in China I guess you just kill yourself when things go wrong so may be things are not so bad after all.
Being an engineering manager can be a difficult road and take you away from what you are really trained to do.At one time in my professional career, I was the engineering manager of productivity which, for that company, was the cost-reduction arm or our design group.Good job but one in which my major function was attending meetings—endless meetings.As the manager, I was on committees for quality, production, reliability, design, field service, etc etc.You get the picture.All of these committees were worthwhile in their own rite but consumed my day and took me away from our real objective—redesigning, or having redesigned, subassemblies that saved money or facillited assembly on the factory floor. My supervisor was not an engineer.He was an accountant by training and only looked at the numbers.We had a quarterly target we were measured against and heads did roll when we fell short of our goals.It was not always fun and the work load was truly burdensome.I now own my on company and work as an engineering consultant which allows me to pick and chose the projects I wish to work on.Much better arrangement.
24 years in a major US corporation – Starting out doing what I loved—designing new products -- right out of college;but quickly saw that promotion opportunities meant more money, more recognition, and better cubicles, eventually leading to offices with doors!Oh, the euphoria!
What one failed to realize during the monotonous trek up the ladder was that you did less and less of what you were originally hired to do – engineer new product concepts – and more and more of what stressed you out – managing people, markets, budgets, vendors, materials, and so on.
24 years later, the company has massive layoffs due to gross mismanagement in a fledging economy, and everything you worked for was been reduced to ashes.Your job has been eliminated.
By the grace of God, I started over as an independent design consultant and now am back to doing what I absolutely love – designing new products -- but had forgotten the passion while stuck trudging on the treadmill corporate ladder.I no longer desire to have a mahogany door to my office, because I happily work from my home.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 3
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
A quick look into the merger of two powerhouse 3D printing OEMs and the new leader in rapid prototyping solutions, Stratasys. The industrial revolution is now led by 3D printing and engineers are given the opportunity to fully maximize their design capabilities, reduce their time-to-market and functionally test prototypes cheaper, faster and easier. Bruce Bradshaw, Director of Marketing in North America, will explore the large product offering and variety of materials that will help CAD designers articulate their product design with actual, physical prototypes. This broadcast will dive deep into technical information including application specific stories from real world customers and their experiences with 3D printing. 3D Printing is
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
16 
