I work in the wire and cable design and manufacturing business, and the industry continues to produce interesting analytical challenges. A few years ago, I made a routine request of a junior technician to collect a random sample of a new cable design from the manufacturing floor. I wanted to confirm that the as-made product was meeting the designed/expected capacitance requirements.
A short time later, he called me out to the lab, sounding quite concerned. I reviewed his findings, and I too was concerned to see a capacitance value much higher than expected. It was way above any acceptable manufacturing or design tolerance.
I first asked the tech to confirm what the dimensions were of the sample, just in case he had been given a piece of the wrong construction (wrong wire and/or insulation thickness). No, he assured me, the conductor was correct. He also noted that the insulation diameter was compliant with designed/specified values, and that the insulation was of the correct material. This ruled out the possibility of an incorrect sample.
Well, when all else fails, check the obvious. Glancing at the coiled sample on his bench, I asked, "How long a sample did you test?" He responded that the sample was 10 feet long. This length is frequently used for electrical/electronic testing in order to produce higher-quality data. It's more accurate than evaluating a single foot, yet with 10 feet you're not wasting too much material in the testing process.
"OK then," I asked, "How do you know the sample is 10 feet?"
His answer? "I asked the operator to give me a 10-foot piece."
And that's the piece he had tested, without actually checking the length. As you've already guessed, it turned out that the sample was a very generous 10-foot length. The faulty length completely explained the anomalous test data.
This entry was submitted by Peter M. Blackford and edited by Rob Spiegel.
Peter Blackford graduated from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 1970 and has been working in the electrical/electronic wire and cable industry since 1978.
Tell us your experience in solving a knotty engineering problem. Send stories to Rob Spiegel for Sherlock Ohms.
@Tool_maker: That's true -- but then again, sometimes the "new guy" finds problems where no one else does, simply because all the "old guys" are so accustomed to looking at the same old problems that they no longer even recognize them as problems, but "just the way things are." Sometimes experience can be just as blinding as ignorance.
A few years ago I was a "new guy" in a research group, and I did find a serious problem. Of course, being aware of how departmental politics worked, I was careful in handling my discovery. What I did was ask my associate, the scientist that I was supporting, what the significance of the one parameter that we were measuring meant. At first his comment was that it really did not mean very much, but then two days later he asked about how certain I was that my measurements were correct. I described my procedure and he was satisfied with the accuracy. The following Monday I was asked to join a meeting where our manager explained that my associate had noticed a problem with some of our original assumptions, (made prior to my joining the group), and we needed to make some fundamnetal changes in our research direction. It was very clear to me that this was due to my questioning about that parameter. The people that I was working with knew what had happened, and I gained a lot more respect from them after that.
Dave: I said the new guy finds problems that do not exist, not that he finds problems which have been overlooked. For example: on parts in a car frame the only dimensions that mean anything are the areas where a robot will weld and hole locations where something else will bolt into place. The rest is just transition from point to point and unless there is an interference with something else, it is in the wind and an design engineer probably signed off on the variance when the part was tooled. Many times material has been added to improve strength. The part may be on thousands of vehicles without a problem.
Then a new quality guy comes in and rejects a delivery because an absolutely meaningless dimension is out of spec. I know every drawing should be updated in a timely fashion, but that often does not happen in the real world. One engineer at a truck manufacturer told me it cost more to change the drawing than to grant an order-order deviance. So it was only after our customer was in a "line-down" situation that someone in engineering straightened the situation out by issuing a "permanent deviance authorization. (And before anyone gripes about American made autos, this was on a Toyota.)
I am not saying this is always the case, but most times when get rejections on a part which was tooled in the 60's and has been in contiuous reorder on a variety of new models, we find there is a new guy involved. But then again the new guys often keep us dinosaurs on our toes, so it is all good.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 3
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
A quick look into the merger of two powerhouse 3D printing OEMs and the new leader in rapid prototyping solutions, Stratasys. The industrial revolution is now led by 3D printing and engineers are given the opportunity to fully maximize their design capabilities, reduce their time-to-market and functionally test prototypes cheaper, faster and easier. Bruce Bradshaw, Director of Marketing in North America, will explore the large product offering and variety of materials that will help CAD designers articulate their product design with actual, physical prototypes. This broadcast will dive deep into technical information including application specific stories from real world customers and their experiences with 3D printing. 3D Printing is
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
4 
