Over the weekend I got a reminder about the value of mechanical switches in some human-machine interfaces. People cannot do everything, nor should they, through a display, touchscreen, and a few pushbuttons.
We have in-ground sprinklers that water our lawn in eight zones. Three other zones handle drip-irrigation lines to shrubs, flowers, and ground-cover plants. Several years ago a landscaper installed a commercial sprinkler controller that lets me set the time for the sprinklers to start a sequence, the length of irrigation time for each zone, and three possible "programs." The controller provides three pushbuttons, a rotary switch, and an LCD. I find that human interface annoying and limiting.
Most of the time the system runs through all 11 zones every few days. At times, though, I want to run a special sequence of, say, zones 3, 4, and 7 to water areas that look particularly dry. The next time I might need to water only zones 1, 2, and drip lines in zone 11. To run such sequences I must select one of the three programs, turn each of the 11 zones on or off by using the rotary switch, pushbuttons, and LCD, run the special sequence, and then return the program to its original state by again going through the zones, one by one. (I rarely vary the watering time for zones, so that's not an issue.)
It would have helped if the manufacturer had provided a set of switches so I could quickly and easily select a few zones and run through a cycle to water only those areas. At the end of the cycle I could change the switch settings so the next cycle would go through all or a few zones. But the controller doesn't provide that flexibility. Although the controller manufacturer has newer units, they still lack the capability to easily turn zones on or off temporarily without having to go through programming steps. An Internet search located many controllers, but all have the same type of interface and limits.
I thought about a design for my own controller that would offer all the "bells and whistles" needed, but after sketching a few ideas, creating a rough flow chart and list of software functions, and thinking about the time needed for a one-off project, I abandoned the idea. There had to be a simpler way to solve the problem.
Then a solution came in a flash -- intercept the valve-control signals that go from the controller to the individual water valves and insert an SPST switch for each signal. Then the controller can go through its regular cycle for all 11 zones, but the switches control the water valves that actually operate. This type of external retrofit solves the special-cycle problem and requires only an external box and switches. I can add it to the circuit without much work. I might include an LED for each zone so I can tell at a distance which valve has power. I have LEDs and switches on hand and just need a plastic case.
The controller manufacturer could have included this type of capability, or at least offered it as an add-on product. Simple mechanical switches triumphed over an overly complicated "simple" user interface.
Hi, Cadman-LT: A good solution. Lucky you kept your old thermostat. The control signals for heating and air conditioning are just on or off. I suppose a switch would do in a pinch. Turn on the heat when you need it and turn it off when you're comfortable. Not practical at night, though!
Jon Titus " I like gadgets as much as anyone, but they shouldn't stand in the way of getting things done as easily as possible." I agree. I went all out on a thermostat for my house...all programmable. Well last winter the unit screwed up on me and refused to let me raise the temperature in my house when it got really cold. Luckily I had kept my old unit and just put it back in place. Sometimes all the tech just gets in the way!
The latest are "smart controllers" that take information like your location, soil type and what plants are in each zone then, based on weather information received via a satellite link, decide when and how long to run each zone.
I don't need that "smart controller" stuff though. All I want is a network enabled controller that I can store, recall and create new schedules through a GUI on any computer or control with an iPhone, iPad or Android mobil device.
I can't understand why Hunter, Rainbird or Toro haven't made that available yet. Seems like a logical step between a manual controller and those "smart controllers".
With average humidity here hovering in the range of 60% to 99.99% from mid-March thru mid-November, I can assure you that "fungus is among us"!!! In fact, IF you've seen some news reports, concerning weathre conditions in the "Liquid" Sunshine State, you're probably aware that our current patterns make us more akin to the monsoon season of S.E. Asia, than the U.S. of A. It's rained very hard at least twice a day now for the past two weeks. And, when I mean very hard, I mean VERY HARD, blindingly teeming rain that lasts for hours, not seconds or minutes!
Earlier this week I received an Orbit 12-station slide-switch sprinkler timer from Orbit, a company in North Salt Lake City. It lets people set independent zone times with a slider control for each zone and a slide switch turns each zone on or off. I plan to use it to replace my RainBird timer this weekend and will report back with the results, probably in a separate blog. In the meantime, you can find more information here: http://www.orbitonline.com/products/Timers/02/01/10/700/
Not much fungus to worry about here in Utah where we have low humidity almost year round. The dryness and heat usually causes the lawn to dry completely within a few hours. Of course the local stores sell fertilizer with a fungicide in case someone thinks they have a fungus problem. (I couldn't find a map of lawn-fungus prevalence in the US.)
Jon,
I read your post about watering @ nite. Here in Fla. the local water authority recommends AGAINST watering at nite on the basis that it can breed lawn fungus. They recommend that sprinkler systems be set for early morning watering only.
This post of the RAIN BIRD controller really hits home in a big way. We had a HARDIE controller that performed well for about 15 years before finally giving up the ghost. It had six zone control with a processor, several switches, AND a big dial.
The "beauty" part of this HARDIE controller lied in the fact that even though it had two independently settable ON times (A & C, on one of the switches), you could override this at ANY time or day! So, here in west central Florida, where we are on water restrictions for once per day, once per week, IF the lawn care specialist applied the chemical treatment on an "off" day, it IS permitted to water in per their recommendation.
After the HARDIE unit failed, I purchased a RAIN BIRD @ the local LOWES, installed it & "programmed" it for the time, day, length, etc. However, it is far more "intelligent" & more "sophisitcated", so I cannot OVERRIDE it to accommodate the example described above. When I called the RAIN BIRD hotline, described the revised operation mode, I was politiely told, "Sorry, you can't do that!" IF ONLY I had my HARDIE again!!!! Wish I bought TWO of them 15 years ago!!!!!! I might just throw this one in the garbage & buy one of those "old-fashioned" time clock style sprinkler controllers. No brains!, but they did work forever!!!!
Great article. Orbit has a timer that I think will do exactly what you want. It is part number 91012. I'll send you one to try out. You can then let us all know what you think.
Hi, Ricardo. Most of the solenoid-type valves I'm familiar with include a means to open or close the valve. So we don't need power. Most of the time this manual valve renains closed and the solenoid valve simply bypasses it. Twist on the valve knob and the valve opens. I have 11 zones and don't want to go to three different control boxes in the yard to manually turn sprinkler zones on or off. Also, I like to water the lawn and plants at night when the sun is down and heat won't evaporate the water. We have high water pressure at night. Darned if I'll get up every 20 minutes starting at 2:00 AM to open and close valves.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 3
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
A quick look into the merger of two powerhouse 3D printing OEMs and the new leader in rapid prototyping solutions, Stratasys. The industrial revolution is now led by 3D printing and engineers are given the opportunity to fully maximize their design capabilities, reduce their time-to-market and functionally test prototypes cheaper, faster and easier. Bruce Bradshaw, Director of Marketing in North America, will explore the large product offering and variety of materials that will help CAD designers articulate their product design with actual, physical prototypes. This broadcast will dive deep into technical information including application specific stories from real world customers and their experiences with 3D printing. 3D Printing is
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
6 
