HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
Blogs
Captain Hybrid

Global Warming: Are the Skeptics Right?

Page 1 / 3 Next >
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 43/54  >  >>
jeffbiss
User Rank
Gold
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
jeffbiss   2/7/2012 1:24:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Watashi,

You see pretty graphs but still refuse to participate or do anything for yourself, as evidenced by your question about needing to be told. Do yourself a favor and read the literature! Start there. There's tons.

smallpond
User Rank
Silver
where that plot...
smallpond   2/7/2012 12:59:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, we are seeing actual data plots now...  Where is the one i asked for -- someone has the information.  Simple chart -- sources for atmospheric CO2 for a year (or w/e) -- shown by percentage.  I think it would answer a lot of questions...

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
Watashi   2/7/2012 12:59:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I saw actual data during research projects sourced from Texas Tech, UT, NASA, and JPL.  I don't have it now nor have a link since the "global warming" trade is not my job.

I know what I know based on facts I have seen and that were published about 10-12 years ago. Insulting and shouting me down only galvanize my assertions about your cause.

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
Watashi   2/7/2012 12:51:24 PM
NO RATINGS
I see pretty graphs -but what is behind them?  they look very much like the dubious "hockey stick" graph.  Are they based on modeled data (i.e. ficticous) or real measurments?  I see a lot of technical looking things from you - but no actual data or reasoned explanations to answer our questions. 

And can you tell me how you come up with a "gloabl temperature"?  There will never be a consensus if we can't agree on the basics!

jeffbiss
User Rank
Gold
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
jeffbiss   2/7/2012 12:50:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Watashi,

Present your evidence for solar forced "global" warming around the solar system.

jeffbiss
User Rank
Gold
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
jeffbiss   2/7/2012 12:47:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Watashi,

You did "this"? Your compalint is that they present no data? You believe?

Have you ever tried to look anything up? Have you ever went to your local library and delved into the scientific journals kept there? Have you ever contacted a researcher for their source data? If you're dissatisfied with their data, have you ever tried to perform your own research?

I have to thank you for presenting a great example of the average denier. I don't know where you get your information but science is all about participating, and it is obvious that you have no such inclination. If you did, you would have done something more than listening to right-wing talking heads and reading right-wing blogs.

Stop being lazy and do some work. You claim to be an engineer yet have chosen to be spoon-fed denier talking points and have chosen to not do your own work, including understanding how climatologists have looked at the implications of solar activity on climate. So, how can you engage in a meanful discussion?

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
Watashi   2/7/2012 12:42:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Sorry - I didn't fully address your point.

What I am saying, is that the sun is the primary heat source for our solar system and planet. There is evidence from other planets in our solar system that the earth's warming/cooling trends are not unique. The arbitrary decision to not consider the sun to a greater degree appears to be a suspect choice of "climatologists".

Cassiopeia
User Rank
Silver
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
Cassiopeia   2/7/2012 12:27:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Indeed all the forcings are taken into account and the solar component, which is insignificant anyway, has been diminishing for some time. 



 

However, less well publicised are the indirect and direct influence of aerosols mainly from poorly regulated coal burning sources which reflects sunlight and cancels a lot of the warming out. Reduce this to improve air quality in China for example, and the forcing gets even higher! This is our dilemma. 

Radiative forcings

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Global warming: are the skeptics correct?
Watashi   2/7/2012 12:25:06 PM
NO RATINGS
I did about 10 years ago and the temp data correlated nicely with the measured solar activity.  This was, of course, from an astronomy perspective with objective data and data collectors at a limited number of sites.

My primary complaint with the whole "consesus" crowd is that they present NO DATA, just their analysis.  I don't take any analysis at face value without the raw data available to back it up.

I also beleieve that their analysis is based on flawed or skewed understanding of basic physics principles.  There is always room for discussion over the applicability of one principle over another, but the AGW crowd demands that we all bow at their alter instead of addressing valid complaints with their methods.

npitech
User Rank
Iron
Stirring the pot
npitech   2/7/2012 12:23:58 PM
NO RATINGS
"I consider this completely valid."  Environmental Committe President, International Council of Scientific Unions

"An astonishing service for humanity." Professor of Environmental Studies, University of California

"We have absolutely no time to lose." Director of Science and Technology, State of Massachusetts

This is what it says on the back cover of my copy of the dvd,  "Stopping the Coming Ice Age" from 1988 -- endorsed by science (Buckminster Fuller), Hollywood (Dennis Weaver) and the music industry (Sting).

<<  <  Page 43/54  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Captain Hybrid
A pure electric car with a lithium-ion battery can lose as much as 57% of its range when the temperature dips and 33% when the mercury rises, a new AAA study says.
Volkswagen AG is developing a lithium-air battery that could triple the range of its electric cars, but industry experts believe it could be a long time before that chemistry is ready for production vehicles.
After reading all the recent news reports about Tesla Motorsí proposed ďGigafactory,Ē itís hard not to wonder about the future of battery-electric cars, and how low their costs can really go.
Californiaís plan to mandate an electric vehicle market isnít the first such undertaking and certainly wonít be the last. But as the Golden State ratchets up for its next big step toward zero-emission vehicle status in 2018, it might be wise to consider a bit of history.
Tesla Motors plans to build a huge battery factory in hopes of making electric cars affordable for the general public.
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service