Automotive News

How Much Would You Pay for an EV?

View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/5  >  >>
User Rank
At what cost?
Jim_E   7/17/2013 8:53:53 AM
I'm really not sure that they could sell me an EV.  I love technology, but to pay that much for a range limited vehicle is just silly in my opinion.

I have a short commute, so I suppose I could use an EV for a commuter car, but I can't imagine it being cost effective for me to buy a dedicated vehicle just for my short commute.  Even when my commute was longer, the cost to purchase a more fuel efficient car just didn't add up for me.

I'd much rather just buy a new motorcycle!

User Rank
Battar   7/17/2013 9:00:04 AM
Before considering buying an EV, heres another question to answer - would you be willing to give up your gas-guzzling SUV/truck/super-sized saloon and drive a conventional, 1.6 liter, 100hp Fiat 500 or Ford Focus ? If your asnwer is "no", despite the obvious savings in fuel, then you are not ready for the EV market. EU residents who drive smaller, fuel efficient cars on a regular basis and would not be seen dead in a Ford F350 are exempt from answering.

User Rank
Re: Incentives a trap
Zippy   7/17/2013 9:04:26 AM
Jerry, you are on the vanguard of the economics-driven argument, and Elizabeth is on the vanguard of the environmental one.  Transportation in the US is a complex problem of economic, social, and environmental issues largely driven by the infrastructure built up over time to support it.  Recall that it was 1999 when Honda introduced the first US hybrid, the Insight.  That provoked all kinds of discussions about how impractical it was, and how hybrids would never be a viable alternative to IC cars.  Now we have moved past hybrids, and the same discussion is happening around EVs.  People can have difficulty seeing how the future can be different from the present sometimes, but I think the forces at work are all going in your direction.  Time will tell.

User Rank
bpenfold   7/17/2013 9:24:33 AM
"If the prices were comparable with those for gasoline-based vehicles, would you make the jump? "

Oh yea. And I did. And I wasn't planning on it. No more oil changes, catalytic converters, spark plugs, motor starters, maintenance schedules, etc.,
I went with the Mitsibushi iMiev. It's $30K. Until July 31st they're knocking off $10K (so it's $20K). And then the Feds give you a $7500 tax credit. That puts it at the cheap gas car price. From plug to wheels I consume about 250W/mile on average. So this electric car is way cheaper to drive than gas. I get about 75 miles/charge in the summer. I do have a Prius for those cross-country trips. I'm ending up putting more miles per month on my iMiev anyway. It also helped that Mitsubishi offers a 100,000 mile battery warranty. Driving all electric is extremely addictive.

BTW, I'm not a green lover. I just love the cost savings and never stopping at a gas station again. People may be surprised how their commuter car collects more miles than their cross-country cars.

User Rank
Re: At what cost?
JoeS2   7/17/2013 9:27:29 AM
This article mentioned the Volt, which does not suffer from the "limited range" problem.  It can use gasoline to drive a generator, and it uses that electricity to maintain battery charge.  

I really considered a Volt.  I wanted a Volt.  Whan the time came to buy a car, the Chevy Cruze was half the price of a Volt: about 19K instead of 38K.  So, based on personal experience, I can say that an extra $19,000 dollars was too much.

if the Volt had been $25K I would almost certainly have bought a Volt instead of a Cruze. $28K?  Still possibliy, would have to discuss it with my wife. Higher than $30K? extra cost over $10,000 to get a car with one less seat (due to the battery hump)?  Too much.

So the lower price with incentives, now bring it into possibly acceptable price range. 

User Rank
Start by taking "EV" out of the equation ...
gafisher   7/17/2013 9:39:16 AM
Fiat's got what may be the most revealing plan -- buy one of their EVs and get up to twelve days' use of a real car.  The bottom line has to be, would you buy a car offering similar performance if it were NOT an EV?

Both the economic and the environmental arguments break down under even slight examination.  Environmentally, the electricity which powers an EV doesn't come out of thin air; unless your power comes from a nuclear or solar plant*, every mile you drive creates air and water pollution somewhere.  There's a reason EV's are called "Coal-Powered Cars."  The economic arguments fall flat as new tax schemes such as "Well-To-Wheel" (WTW) and EV Road Taxes come on line, removing any cost savings expected from abandoning gasoline.  Tax subsidies -- A.K.A. "making your neighbors help pay for your car" -- have been attractive to those who don't mind looting the public treasury, but those programs are (thankfully!) winding down.

So the real question is: would you accept the inconvenience, miniscule range, and discomfort of that car if it weren't an EV?  If so, great!  Buy it -- it's your right -- but please be sure to turn down any government incentives if you have a shred of honor.  And if not, well, that's great too: you'll be amazed at how good some of today's cars are, including many of the hybrids.


* Even if you have access to "clean" solar energy, the production of those solar cells is poisoning soil, water and air in China and elsewhere, and nuclear shares some of those problems.  Wind is a dead end with its own severe environmental problems.

User Rank
Re: At what cost?
gafisher   7/17/2013 9:42:30 AM
Despite efforts by both GM and the government to deny it, the Volt is a Hybrid, not an EV.  Having driven both, I'd take a Prius over a Volt any day of the week.

User Rank
I would pay what it's worth to me
Contrarian   7/17/2013 9:45:13 AM
Mr. Dycus and I are on the same page with regards to these riduculously heavy, overly complex and commensurately expensive EV's that are being offered by the major players.  Possibly it is because nearly everything these manufacturers offer is overly complex and commensurately expensive - that's all they know how to build, or at least they believe that's all they can offer and make a worthwhile profit on.  They're building to the market and it's probably a fair statement that if they offered a spartan EV with bench seats, crank windows and no A/C it would be a colossal flop irrespective of fuel type.

I have a battery EV and when you have an EV, you don't need a second car - it *is* the second car.  In that role, it's actually very useful and in some cases fun and convenient.  Because you know you're not going on a cross country trip in it, the range issue is nearly irrelvant.  You fuel it at home, and it's always 100% ready to go when you leave.  Plugging it in to charge for the night is no different than topping off your cell phone.  In my mind an EV as a second car can be every bit as functional as its' ICE counterpart.  But that's about as good as it gets, meaning if equivalent is the best it can do, then for sure it should not cost any more either.  Otherwise, where's the value?  Saving the planet?  Not for most people.  If you're driving *any* kind of car thinking it's "green", you're somewhere in the range between ignorant and idiot.

Unless you have very limited driving requirements a contemporary EV will only be good as a second car.  As such, that's all it's ever going to be worth.  Not hard to justify a nominal expense on such a vehicle, as this expense would happen irrespective of the vehicle fuel source.  It would be safe to say not many people would want to spend more on a second car as they do their primary/trip car.  As it stands today, that pricing is upside down.  From my perspective as a long time EV owner there's no way in hell I'd spend upwards of a mortgage payment on a car I only drive to work and back in, and do errands on weekends.  Deduct for the range limit and guaranteed eventual pack replacement/devaluation and in my mind that price point must be put under that of a similarly featured ICE vehicle.  I'm here to tell you that after the novelty of charging your car instead of putting gas in it wears off, the cost to own and operate it will still be there. 

I can't afford a "luxury" EV anymore than a "luxury" ICE.  But I can afford a "working man's" ICE.  There are no "working man's" EV's.  Until that happens, no factory built EV's for me.


User Rank
They are still a dumb purchase...
kf2qd   7/17/2013 9:50:41 AM
I think the current EVs are still rather stupid cars for the average person. And the idea that I have to pay a subsidy for a car I can't even afford in the first place. Just like the Cash for Clunkers, I am paying a subsidy so people who can already afford the car are getting 7500 off the price.

Once again the market is telling us athere is a problem with these vehicles as a vehicle for everyone, and we try to deny this by fiddling with the marketplace to help people who can already afford the car to buy it.

Most electric vehicles won't get people to work and home in 1 charge. So should every employer be forced to add to their cost bey putting charging station in every parking space? Another tax on employers?

Same problem exists now that existed with the GM electric car - "Who Killed the Electric Car?" They are practical only under a very narrow set of constraints, and not many people live lives that fit within those constraints.

Tesla - WOW! $80 battery swap to go another 150 miles. I can go 480 miles for the same cost now. Where's the benefit? Or should we just run the cost of gasoline up so it forces people to buy a car they can't afford? Engineers and suchare in the upper middle class *or at least some of us are) and these cost numbers might not look all that bad. But there are a lot of people that are making way less and these prices are absurd.


User Rank
EVs to save the planet?
KenL   7/17/2013 11:01:34 AM
Anyone who still thinks that EVs are good for the environment long term should read this article:

"Unclean at Any Speed - Electric cars don't solve the automobile's environmental problems"  http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/renewables/unclean-at-any-speed

Over their life cycle, EVs are no better for the environment. 

Part of the cost savings over gas is that electricity does not include road use taxes. 

Take away the subsidies (from other people's money) and add in the equivalent road use taxes, and see if the EV can still be made competitive with an IC car.

<<  <  Page 2/5  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Automotive News
Take a look at 15 of the most important automotive safety technologies from the past 50 years and the next half-century.
If there’s a rule of thumb in modern engine design, it’s that smaller is better. Smaller engines weigh less, burn less fuel, and simplify packaging.
Higher prices and glitzy new technologies don’t necessarily make for better automotive headlights, a first-ever study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety suggests.
A February letter from federal regulators to Google Inc. appears to have sent automakers and tier-one suppliers scrambling to accelerate their investments in autonomous vehicle technology.
Tesla Motors’ $35,000, 200-mile electric car may not revolutionize the auto industry by itself, but it could serve as a starting point for a long, steady climb to a day when half of the world’s vehicles will be plug-ins.
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service