HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Captain Hybrid

NHTSA to Brake Unintended Acceleration

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/7  >  >>
TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: vs. learning how to drive ?
TJ McDermott   5/9/2012 11:34:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe manual transmissions will require an inclinometer to detect stops on a hill?

bwilson4web
User Rank
Gold
Re: Just One Minute!
bwilson4web   5/10/2012 5:17:54 AM
NO RATINGS
You mentioned "tin whiskers" and I have some recent experience supporting this hypothesis. For several years, I've been 'rebuilding' 2001-03 Prius accelerator assemblies. A dual-pot encoder, when they become "noisy" the control computers detect this and trigger a safe-home mode. This caused the vehicle to behave as if a big-hand was holding the vehicle back.

The replacement accelerator assembly cost ~$500 not counting labor to install. So Doug Schaffer figured out how to rebuild the encoder and I carried this on when he went to China. A simple process, we used a Dremel tool to remove the cover and clean the contacts and surfaces. Reassembled using JB Weld epoxy, it was a cost effective solution. But eventually with the low volumes, I stopped doing this. Then I read the 'tin whisker' papers from GSFC.

I still had a number of 'broken' encoders so following the procedure described in the papers, verified the broken ones had similar characteristics. Then using a 9 V battery to 'burn out' the tin whiskers, I retested them and their failure symptoms were gone.

Modern encoders are Hall effect devices, not dual-pots, so the tin whisker threat is significantly reduced. Furthermore, the older 2001-03 Prius are going out of service and the data suggests these problems were limited to the first year or two of production. The 2003 model year encoders haven't shown similar failure rates. Regardless, 'burning out' the tin whiskers turned out to be a simple and effective solution.

Bob Wilson

cgosnell
User Rank
Silver
Re: vs. learning how to drive ?
cgosnell   5/10/2012 9:38:58 AM
NO RATINGS
I think that trying to get to feature to work in software and co-exist with times when you might want to depress the throttle and brake is an exercise in futulity.  

The 'safety' feature needs to exist apart from the normal throttle, brake and gear shift controls.  We already have plenty of experience providing this type of safety system.

I am amazed that auto manufacturers haven't had to do what industrial equipment makes have had to do--- install a big red e-stop (panic) button.  When we still had mechanical keys we effectively had this.  

Now that electronic 'keyless' systems have been in wide use, we have lost the method for shutting down a misbehaving system and this current condition was bound to happen.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Potentiometer or Encoder or Transducer
GlennA   5/10/2012 9:40:15 AM
NO RATINGS
The gas pedal sensor has been called a potentiometer, and now a dual-pot encoder in these posts.  A 'pot' or potentiometer is not an encoder.  Does someone know the exact nomenclature of this device ?  The encoders that I am familiar with are optical = led's and a rotary grating.

Droid
User Rank
Platinum
Hold the brake and roast the tires.
Droid   5/10/2012 9:42:18 AM
Here's another solution looking for a problem.  I do not like idea of putting this on every car in the universe simply because a few people fail to hit the correct pedal.   I am tired of seeing this panic everytime a problem like this hits the news.  Yes, its unfortunate that someone gets hurt or killed, but life is full of risk.

Besides - If we are still in the land of the free and home of the brave, (not sure about that anymore)..   I would really like to retain the option to hold the brake and roast the tires.   OR - at least know that it is still possible even if I'm too much of an old fuddy-duddy to actually do it.

Walt
User Rank
Gold
Re: vs. learning how to drive ?
Walt   5/10/2012 9:50:00 AM
I would think manual transmissions would be exempt from this measure.  Other reasons (besides starting uphill) could exist that the operator might want or need to press brake and accelerator at the same time.

The manual transmission is about the operator having control of power delivery rather than the machine having control over it.  Drivers who prefer manual transmissions are generally going to be of a higher skill level and less likely to forget that there are numerous ways to stop unintentional acceleration - and the clutch pedal is right next to the brake.  (Yes, I've been using manual transmissions on a wide range of vehicle types for over 30 years.  I started very young.:))

 

cookiejar
User Rank
Gold
Re: Just One Minute!
cookiejar   5/10/2012 9:59:29 AM
I find it telling that Toyota was still using carbon pots for the critical throttle position sensor, while at that time the whole automotive industry had long abandoned carbon pots for digital encoders for the volume control of their car radios, because pots were too noisy.

Not that other sensors aren't susceptible to analogous disturbances.

A couple of months back I took a new Toyota Sienna for a test drive.  After all, it's the only van "recommended" by Consumers Reports.  I found it very difficult to control its speed.  Even on a flat smooth and level  road, with my foot braced against the center console, the car would slow down and speed up by itself making driving tiring.  When I engaged the cruise control, everything settled right down.  As you may expect the saleslady with me denied there was anything wrong.  Apparently she gets these paranoid test drivers all the time.  My hunch was a throttle control problem - still.

How does one go about checking 280,000 lines of code?  One immediately thinks of Microsoft Windows, which gets updated ("corrected") weekly.   A car manufacturer doesn't have this luxury. 

Today's development cycle is highly cost and time constrained.  How often have you heard the announcement, "Well, it seems to work.  Let's get it out into the field."  Further tests are costly and would rob our lead in the marketplace. Then when problems develop in the field, it's always the "stupid users" fault.  Wouldn't it make sense to design with the "stupid user" in mind?   We can blame it all on human nature's tendency to pass the buck and blame the victim.

Let's just give a thought to how many of our electronic devices have failed in some way in the last 10 years.  Couldn't most of those failures been avoided by better design?  Same old - same old lousy engineering.  We're all human after all.


bwilson4web
User Rank
Gold
Re: Potentiometer or Encoder or Transducer
bwilson4web   5/10/2012 10:18:29 AM
NO RATINGS
You asked ". . . a potentiometer, and now a dual-pot encoder . . .". Well you can find photos of them in this Yahoo Group folder:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toyota-prius-sat1/photos/album/1819219761/pic/list

I call them dual-pots sharing a common shaft.

Bob Wilson, Huntsville, AL

bdcst
User Rank
Platinum
Re: vs. learning how to drive ?
bdcst   5/10/2012 10:20:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Not really.  While a manual transmission obviously requires hill holding skill for even the mildest incline, steep roads will even cause an automatic to roll backwards as the idle speed does not produce sufficient torque through the converter.  First  hand knowledge, don't ya know.  :-)   But either way a gas/brake interlock has to be smart and tolerant or it'll be an annoyance at best and dangerous at worst.

RNDDUDE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Just One Minute!
RNDDUDE   5/10/2012 10:20:56 AM
NO RATINGS
The mentioned dual-pedal-application fix, and the many posters problem with it preventing intentional dual pedal use when needed could be remidied by having a timer delay in the software coding, say requiring 3-5 seconds of continuous dual pedal application to trigger the shutoff. That would allow the occasional valid use of dual pedals that is occasionally useful, and yet maintain the shutdown feature when it is really needed.

<<  <  Page 2/7  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Captain Hybrid
An engineering team from Ohio State University has set its sights on the unimaginable -- driving 400 mph in an electric vehicle.
We’ve collected photos of electric cars, designed for both the neighborhood blacktop and the commercial dragstrip. From the Crazyhorse Pinto and the Killacycle motorcycle to the Tesla Roadster and the 500-HP Renovo Coupe, we offer a peek at the blistering performance of the electric powertrain.
Tesla Motors might be planning to boost the driving range of its two-seat Roadster to 400 miles.
A Silicon Valley company has made the biggest splash yet in the high-performance end of the electric car market, announcing an EV that zips from 0 to 60 mph in 3.4 seconds and costs $529,000.
Working with engineers at Bosch Automotive, BMW AG is rolling out a fast-charge system that could replenish the battery of its i3 electric car in just 30 minutes.
Design News Webinar Series
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 22 - 26, MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide (Using a Real Eval Board)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service