HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Captain Hybrid

Slideshow: Why Automakers Are Rolling Out Electric Cars

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 3/6  >  >>
Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: The "WHY" is easy
Cadman-LT   12/10/2012 4:00:36 AM
I agree with these as being the why: "They include legal compliance, government subsidies" just my 2 cents worth.

billvon
User Rank
Silver
Re: Purely EV are not as Eco Friendly as you might believe...
billvon   12/8/2012 10:20:35 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, and since I generate my power from solar, there are no powerplant emissions associated with my Leaf either.  (There are of course emissions during the manufacturing process, as there are for all cars - for all products we use, in fact.)

vfx
User Rank
Iron
Re: The "WHY" is easy
vfx   12/7/2012 5:01:42 PM
NO RATINGS
"... if electrics made sense they would sell like hotcakes."

Being in love with a car is an emotional state. Tesla makes cars pepole want to own once they drive it. Those that can afford a Mercedes or a Panamera often do, and Tesla is only shooting for a 10th of the 250,000 premium market cars sold. 

 

It took about 12 years for digital camera to totaly replace photochemical photography. I figure starting with the Leaf, double that before most cars sold will be fully battery electric. 

vfx
User Rank
Iron
Re: Wrong market
vfx   12/7/2012 4:54:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Seems like every Post Office in the US does a long test on electric delivery trucks, deterimies it would save them millions and then orders the same thing they always did. The fix is still in.

vfx
User Rank
Iron
Re: Purely EV are not as Eco Friendly as you might believe...
vfx   12/7/2012 4:50:56 PM
NO RATINGS
That "study" is prety vauge with phrases like, "In contrast, if plug-in vehicles are charged using coal-generated electricity, they could cause several thousands of dollars more damage per vehicle."

Really? "could cause"?? That's opinion, not a study and only a shrinking handfull of states are running on 100% coal. All  other states have EVs as cleaner.  It does go on to say, " There are myriad other arguments for supporting vehicle electrification beyond human health, environmental, and oil-displacement effects. This long list might include job creation, reducing the trade deficit by shifting from foreign to domestic fuel sources, enabling a distributed storage resource to support the integration of intermittent renewable electricity generation, reducing oil revenues to states hostile to U.S. interests, hedging against an anticipated oil-scarce or carbon-constrained future, improving regulatory control over emissions associated with poor vehicle maintenance, generating positive externalities by encouraging innovation, encouraging domestic development of strategic technical competency and intellectual property, reducing nonfinancial political and human suffering effects from war and political instability, and promoting international environmental justice. However, because HEVs and PHEVs with smaller battery packs provide more air-emissions reduction and oil displacement per dollar spent and offer lifetime costs competitive with conventional vehicles, it is not clear that directing near-term subsidies toward vehicles with large battery packs would produce superior results on any of these objectives.

So if you are referencing it as an attack on "green" transpotation, it sure makes up for it by pointing out all the other reasons for getting off oil.

tluxon
User Rank
Gold
Re: Why this article?
tluxon   12/7/2012 3:05:44 PM
Try again?  You brought up Al Gore - I simply responded.

As for addressing climate change, we need to be wiser than to keep falling for the problem-reaction-solution gimmicks played on us to keep funneling money from the masses to the "elite".  Funny that their "solutions" always seem to place more limitations on us than on them.

Nonetheless, I'm curious to know why the very concerning issue of oxygen depletion isn't getting the same attention that's being given to rising CO2 levels.  It would not surprise me to discover how much it has to do with how the "solutions" meet the moneychangers' true objectives.

CharlesM
User Rank
Silver
Re: Why this article?
CharlesM   12/7/2012 12:29:57 PM
Do you have any evidence of your charges against Gore? Even if true, Gore is out-bankrolled by the propaganda efforts of the fossil fuel industry by several orders of magnitude.

In any event Gore is irrelevant to any question over climate change. Try again.

tluxon
User Rank
Gold
Re: Why this article?
tluxon   12/7/2012 12:22:44 PM
I guess it depends on whose twisted version of reality we want to adhere to.  The oil cartels have stood in the way of developing other energy paradigms while limiting their product for maximum profit.  Al Gore tried to convince and manipulate the masses that consensus could be reached in premature scratching-the-surface "science" for the financial and political gain of his side of the energy market.  Neither side has represented themselves in an ethically honest manner, and have been unable to hide that their true motivation is for money and control rather than for the empowerment and good of the rest of us.

CharlesM
User Rank
Silver
Why this article?
CharlesM   12/7/2012 11:56:37 AM
Maybe it's about growth and the future of the automobile:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/toddwoody/2012/12/06/electric-car-sales-hit-another-record/ 

Should we expect a more radically abrupt shift? How many early car companies survived the sharpest growth decades for automobiles? How many dot com businesses survived the '90s boom and did that result in the internet going out of business? I'm not saying EV makers will go bankrupt, but the quick high profit strategy of selling as many high margin gas guzzlers while they are hot, with no eye toward the future, hasn't worked out too well either.

Keep trying to scare off early adapters, Mr. Murray.  But your anti-EV bias is showing.

Which reminds me it's about time again for another Global Warming is an Al Gore Hoax article from UBM.

Rigby5
User Rank
Gold
Re: Business Model doesn't Fail with battery exchanges
Rigby5   12/6/2012 10:15:17 PM
If the government would have used the bail outs to force car makers to devise a common battery standard, then electric and hybrid cars would be much more attractive.

If all of them used the exact same form factor battery back, then you could establish battery exchanges.  You could buy a membership, and it would be not only an insurance policy to cover battery failure risk, but allow for greatly extenede range, simply by replacing the battery pack instead of waiting for it to recharge.

Then many more people would feel there was not longer any risk involved in buying an electric or hybrid vehicle.

<<  <  Page 3/6  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Captain Hybrid
Working with engineers at Bosch Automotive, BMW AG is rolling out a fast-charge system that could replenish the battery of its i3 electric car in just 30 minutes.
If you’ve charted the course of the electric car market over many years, then you know that we’ve always been two years away from a metamorphosis … or five years … or more.
Tesla's "affordable electric car" now has a name and a price. The Model 3 will sell for $35,000.
From plug-in hybrids and battery-electric vehicles to CNG trucks and hydrogen-powered cars, we offer a peek at the growing category of alternative fuel vehicles.
Toyota Motor Corp. made its case for a hydrogen-powered future last week by revealing the exterior of a fuel cell sedan that will go on sale in 2015.
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 8 - 12, Get Ready for the New Internet: IPv6
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service