Automotive News

Don't Worry, Your EV Battery Won't Explode

< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
User Rank
Re: No doubt, debate
melllowfelllow   4/16/2012 5:57:20 PM
@Stuart21 - Your proposal is exactly what is wrong with so much of the world today. I would think that a bit of common sense and root cause analysis would yield a better [for the consumer] solution. I'm not sure how often that Aussies dunk their vehicles, but I will not let that stop me from commenting.

Problem statement: Insurance companies payout too much money to repair water damage to dunked vehicles.

Comment: I hope that you do not have a technical background because the cost to protect the electronics [design, test, implement, increased servicability cost, and upgrade to components in many cases] is not insignificant.

Proposed solution: Pass on to every vehicle purchaser the cost for '24 hour dunk protection'.

Alternative solutions:

1. Make 'vehicle dunking insurance' an option available at extra cost or 'not covered'.

2. Increase the price of your insurance so that it is spread among each of your customers.

3. Sames as #2. Pretend that you are a real insurance company, assess the risk, compute the cost, and set the consumer price.

4. Terminate participation in the sale of automobile insurance.


User Rank
Re: No doubt, debate
MIROX   4/16/2012 5:55:53 PM
2007 OKA NEV ZEV was in real life submerged in 3 feet of rainwater and while all other cars parked at that lot in Henderson NV during that flash flood rain storm were total losses (about 18 of them), the car could not only be driven off with still about 18 inches of water in it, it only needed to have the throttle sliding pot 5K resistor replaced as the "dirty water" that got in to it made it not operate "smoothly" there after when it dried out.

The car is 48V DC nominal with 4kW/h battery pack and 12 V DC aux battery for normal car equipment (Both sealed lead acid batteries)

So a well designed EV and actually operate as a submarine completely submerged under any water, the high voltage in other designs will NOT cause much other than some water being electrolized to H2 and O2 but that will just bubble off. 

But of course NOT SEALED ECU will most likely fail, the one in OKA is potted in RTV after initial test and "burn-in" and so far only 2 have failed since 2003, both due to customers shorting out the output (450 A fused) while experimenting to make the car go faster than the FMVSS mandated 25 MPH limit for LSV.

More than flood, water or anything else customers EXPERIMENTING with their vehicles are far more common causes of problems - they do it with hopping up Hp on diesels, and "tuning" normal cars to self destruction, yet that seldom makes much news - but lot of Internet noise when the OEM denies warranty repairs on "modified" vehicles.




William K.
User Rank
Explosions, betteries, and other concerns.
William K.   4/16/2012 5:49:10 PM
For starters, whatever it was at GM that went boom was probably not a battery explosion. To get technical about it, in an explosion the propogation is by shock waves, which travel at the speed of sound in whatever media is exploding. And sound travels quite rapidly in a solid. An example of explosions is detonation, known as spark knock, in a gas engine. Normal running is just rapid burning. The blowup could have been caused by hydrogen gas liberated by charging some kind of battery, and being ignited by some accident, such as a small spark. The quite rapid combustion brings about a corresponding increase in temperature and, therfore, pressure, which can do a great deal of damage. Some dynamometer cells are built with "blow-out" doors, so that the rapid combustion resulting from a spray of gasoline igniting will not cause a lot of damage.

The chance of a true explosion in a production type battery is nonexistant because it has been designed out. Things can still burn and get messy, but by the time a product gets near to the prototypem stage the pressure relief system has already been put in place, even if the need for it is only theoretical. 

MY bet is that whatever battery caused the incident, it was much earlier in 6the stage, closer to the time when they check to see how many charge-discharge cycles some new battery technology can live through before it loses capacity. And the failure was most likely in the venting system that handles the gasses produced in the charge discharge cycle.

But you would not tell the media that because they would distort it so much that it would lead to a general panic, which, after all, is what the news people love to do.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Re: poor driving choices of drivers'
Rob Spiegel   4/16/2012 4:30:14 PM

Good point, Glenn. Yet my kids will probably see some of these wild ideas come true, such as cars that drive themselves and won't crash into each other. Those kinds of advances may be expensive, but in lives saved, it's the equivalent of ending a war.

User Rank
Re: More dangers
kenish   4/16/2012 4:25:49 PM
@Daniel- Agree.  Recently a Rolls Royce facility was pretty much demolished when a "blade off" test of a jet engine didn't go as expected.  It was a test, and I'm sure the results will contribute to a safer design more than if the test had the expected result. 

User Rank
Re: poor driving choices of drivers'
GlennA   4/16/2012 1:31:07 PM
I have a bit of experience with the structural assembly of cars and trucks.

Waterproofing the computer is only the tip of the iceberg.  The electric window motors, the radio, the navigation system, the upholstery, the power seat motors, the heater / air conditioner fan and vacuum controls, the electric fan(s) for the radiator, the remote trunk open, the a/c compressor clutch, the power sunroof, the power door locks, the air bags and sensors.  The list could go on and on.

Do you propose to include all of these ?  Otherwise what you have is a car that has a computer that can be salvaged, while the rest is a loss.

User Rank
Re: poor driving choices of drivers'
Stuart21   4/16/2012 1:17:32 PM
You can propose whatever design rules you like mate, I'll stick to mine.

That car computer that costs hundreds of dollars to replace when it doesn't work can be waterproofed for around a dollar. Cost effective. Etc etc etc.

I am an automotive engineer and industrial designer but am not associated with the auto industry at the current time.

I know what can be done.

Where are you coming from, Glenn?

User Rank
poor driving choices of drivers'
GlennA   4/16/2012 1:03:26 PM
Then why stop at 24 hours immersion in fresh water ?

Why not include a parachute for drivers that might drive off of a cliff ?

Or super-energy-absorbing bumpers to resist a crash into a wall at 100 mph ?

Or require a car be able do roll 3 times, land on its tires, and drive away ?

Certain features, although nice, are not cost-effective.

User Rank
Uneducated Media
ervin0072002   4/16/2012 12:50:34 PM
Yep got to love the Hype.... The problem as many of you mentioned is our media. Back in the day it was all about the truth and having the story correct... Now it's all about the best story (regardless of the facts behind it, if it sounds good put it on the front line). Now To be honest it is sort of hilarious. I'm a test engineer and I do sit down and asses the risk that each test has. Overheating a battery in a closed unvented room might have raised a few flags on my review... Just Saying..



<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Automotive News
General Motors is putting an off-road twist on hydrogen fuel cell technology with an imposing new pickup demonstrator called the Chevrolet Colorado ZH2.
The term “autopilot” is now at the heart of a growing debate between Tesla Motors Inc. and Germany’s Federal Motor Transport Authority.
Twenty months after news leaked about Apple Inc.’s secretive automotive project, the high-tech giant has apparently decided it will not go toe-to-toe with Detroit, leaving few in the Motor City surprised.
From the Corvair and the Pinto to the Gremlin and the Pacer, we’ve collected the worst vehicles that suffered from design and engineering hiccups.
Electric powertrains are stealing the spotlight, as automakers showcase their best and brightest battery-powered vehicles, during the Paris Motor Show, Oct. 1-16.
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 10 - 14, Embedded System Design Techniques™: Getting Started Developing Professional Embedded Software
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course September 27-29:
Sponsored by 3M
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service