HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Automotive News

Battery Lab Could Help GM Reach EV Vision

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/2
Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: cooperation needed
Charles Murray   10/2/2013 8:19:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Back in about 1990, Nadine, the Big Three formed the United States Advanced Battery Consortium, which has had some positive effect. The Defense Department's Advanced Research Projects Agency also has a program going, which was formed more recently. As you say, though, it's been slow. Battery development is hard. See links below.

http://www.uscar.org/guest/view_team.php?teams_id=12 

http://www.arpa-e.energy.gov/sites/default/files/documents/files/RANGE_ProjectDescriptions_082013.pdf

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The future is still to be determined
naperlou   10/2/2013 5:07:12 PM
NO RATINGS
tekochip, I recall reading about nuclear batteries a long time ago.  They were based on radioactive decay.  I am not sure that fusion will fit in a car (once they make it work).

Maybe this is the solution.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Testing the work of others
Rob Spiegel   10/2/2013 4:24:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice article, Chuck. What I find interesting here is the commitment GM is giving to thew work of others. With the size of this lab, it would initially seem this is for development. But no, it's a testing lab. That's impressive.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: The future is still to be determined
tekochip   10/2/2013 11:21:26 AM
NO RATINGS
It's all about the battery.  The rest of the technology has reached the point where the efficiencies and power output make the system viable.  There just needs to be a power source. 

Mr. Fusion?

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
cooperation needed
NadineJ   10/2/2013 11:06:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I can't help but wonder how much farther along the technology would be if manufacturers worked together or if an outside company took over to develop the technology for the entire industry.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
The future is still to be determined
naperlou   10/2/2013 9:30:51 AM
NO RATINGS
Cap'n, as you have pointed out, the future of pure EVs is not looking great.  The battery technology is not progressing as fast as needed to make this viable.  Even some of the EV proponents are admitting that these are second, commuter cars (so, why are we subsudizing $80K Teslas?). 

Researching batteries is a very important endeavor.  I think that batteries will be a part of the automobile system for the foreseeable future.  It is important for companies like GM to test and characterize these systems for themselves.  This is too important to leacve to suppliers.

<<  <  Page 2/2
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Automotive News
Sales of plug-in electric vehicles in the US fell by about 5% in 2015, despite a record-setting year for the rest of industry.
Infrastructure is usually cited as the hurdle facing the new fuel cell vehicles, but the truth is, cost will be an imposing problem, too.
The end may not yet be near, but recent statements by two of the world’s biggest automakers point to the fact that the industry has begun to plan for a dramatic decline in vehicles that are powered solely by internal combustion engines.
At the recent Autodesk Accelerate event in Boston, the director of product development for a niche hypercar firm replied "no, no, no" to three answers he got for what makes a car go faster. What was the right response?
A panel of automotive experts at the Renesas DevCon suggested that the technology for such autonomous vehicles is still far too expensive to be practical.
Design News Webinar Series
1/28/2016 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/8/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/18/2016 11:00 AM PT | 2:00 PM ET
2/24/2016 11:00 AM PT | 2:00 PM ET
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 11 - 15, Designing ARM Devices Using Segger Tools
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service