HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Captain Hybrid

Auto Vehicle-to-Vehicle Comms Viewed as Life Saver

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Plan or React
ChasChas   3/1/2012 11:12:25 AM
NO RATINGS
People are for the most part, planners or reacters by nature. When panners must react, they usually already have a plan for the reaction.

Reacters are accident prone.  Always a second late and a thought short.

Planners are two or three steps ahead as far as what the other drivers on the road are might do.  They think about where they are going, how they plan to get there amd of course how they plan to flow with the traffic around them to get there.

Info alone cannot save lives - it's how the driver uses it. Is the driver using it to plan or is the driver merely reacting to it? 

The question is: Will this technology make you more of a planner or more of a reacter as you drive?

pelengr17
User Rank
Iron
V2V....Keep it simple
pelengr17   3/1/2012 11:04:16 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with many of the comments here.  There is definitely potential for this and existing models of how it could work.  The new ADS-B Out systems in aviation are a good example of getting information about weather and local traffic to the pilot as well as sending out position and altitude to others.  Fortunately, most pilots are very alert and abreast of the situation.  However, even in the pilot world we've learn that lots of gadgets and information can be overwhelming.  It's called a glass cockpit.  Training now days focuses more on how to manage that and fly the plane.  Driver training, in my opinion, is severly lacking.

I also have to admit that I don't get excited about the government or others being able to track me, know my speed, driving habits, etc.  all by throwing up some receivers along side the road.  If this does move forward, I think the information broadcast needs to be generic.  Things like:  vehicle speed, location, size, and condition (for wrecks).  Assuming it's constantly rebroadcast, it should be enough for another car's computer to determine direction, distance, and general state.  If a car is in a collision, it could change state and other cars/drivers could be alterted and maybe even pass that info along to other cars up the road.  It could also be picked up by local receivers to alert emergency personel.  What it doesn't need to broadcast, is my vehicle make, model, VIN, or really anything else that directly ties a person to a vehicle.  If it does, there will nothing but privacy law suits.

HowieD231
User Rank
Silver
Yes, but....
HowieD231   3/1/2012 9:52:10 AM
NO RATINGS
How long before municipalities claim "eminent domain" over V2V signals in their jurisdictions and start the money machine of issuing automatic summons based on V2V reports.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: No big issue...
naperlou   3/1/2012 9:42:54 AM
NO RATINGS
tmash, you are quite correct.  As a warning system for drivers I think it is limited in utility (as I mentioned in my previous post).  I think it is looked at as either a way for manufacturers to differentiate themselves or as a way for regulators to seem to be doing something.  Like many of the alternative technologies we see these days applied to automobiles there is really little utility for everyday use. 

tmash
User Rank
Iron
No big issue...
tmash   3/1/2012 9:25:33 AM
NO RATINGS
I dont see any big issue with this V2V communication system eventually the technology will come into use when driverless cars are in full production. Thats the only way its applications can make technical sense and work with almost zero errors.For now there is no need to implement the technology in current vehicle versions.It wont achieve the intended results.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
V2V Communication
Mydesign   3/1/2012 2:03:46 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Charles, it seems a direct to direct talk version of early warning systems using sensors. In early warning system sensors are measuring the distance between nearby objects are giving some warning signals. In v 2 v communication model, I would eager to know about the frequency allocation without collision or frequency hopping.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Slow ramp to life savings benefits
Charles Murray   2/29/2012 10:58:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Beth, you've hit on one of the essential issues of V2V: Until everyone has it, the value is greatly diminished. If some vehicles don't have it, I can't depnd on it.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Pure V2V vs. GPS assist
naperlou   2/29/2012 10:05:29 PM
NO RATINGS
JimT, I agree with you.  V2V is not a location issue.  Now, GPS would be nice for traffic avoidance, etc., but that is already incorporated into many car navigation systems.  As is typical in these efforts requirements get out of hand. 

I also wonder how useful these systems will be unless there is some aspect of automatic operation by the system.  There are cars that have some of the features discussed here.  Of course, they don't have the V2V part, but using other sensors they give lots of warnings.  I was in such a car, in a downtown environment.  The driver and I were deep in a conversation and the car was talking up a storm as well.  The driver basically ignored everything he was being told. So, I have to wonder...

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Collision detect
naperlou   2/29/2012 9:56:40 PM
NO RATINGS
I really wonder how this would work in some countries.  As Tim says, in China, it would be problematic.  I do not have any experience of Asia, but in Europe, where I lived for a while, it would be similar.  I lived in England, which is much more like here.  I also drove extensively in Germany and Scandnavia.  In all these countries, I felt much like the more sane parts of the US.  There were many countries where I would not drive, such as Italy or France.  I also did not drive in Athens.  Drivers would very much have to adapt to the system or it would be worthless. 

Tim
User Rank
Platinum
Collision detect
Tim   2/29/2012 7:05:21 PM
NO RATINGS
In China where driving about one inch from the car next to you is accepted, it is common for cars to have proximity sensors on them to alert the driver when he is too close to another vehicle. If M2M can do the same task, I would say that it is worth it.

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Captain Hybrid
Fiat-Chrysler Automobiles CEO Sergio Marchionne has again committed the colossal sin of speaking plainly, and electric vehicle advocates aren’t happy about it.
Electric vehicle batteries are progressing rapidly, but there’s still no sign on the horizon that the technology is going to revolutionize the auto industry anytime soon, experts said at The Battery Show in Detroit last week.
An engineering team from Ohio State University has set its sights on the unimaginable -- driving 400 mph in an electric vehicle.
We’ve collected photos of electric cars, designed for both the neighborhood blacktop and the commercial dragstrip. From the Crazyhorse Pinto and the Killacycle motorcycle to the Tesla Roadster and the 500-HP Renovo Coupe, we offer a peek at the blistering performance of the electric powertrain.
Tesla Motors might be planning to boost the driving range of its two-seat Roadster to 400 miles.
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service