HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs
Top Reasons for the US to Return to Space
8/14/2013

Image 1 of 9      Next >

The Space Portal
The Space Portal at the NASA Ames Research Center was organized to help accelerate the establishment of the new space economy by:

- Developing mutually beneficial partnerships among industry, universities, nonprofits, and government
- Serving as the catalyst between NASA and entrepreneurial space organizations to promote commercial space development
- Organizing and executing pioneering developments and demonstrations that open new markets
- Supporting space activities that benefit the public
- Promoting increased demand for space exploration
- Acting as the 'friendly front door,' the Space Portal will help make NASA space infrastructure available for commercial development
The Space Portal at the NASA Ames Research Center was organized to help accelerate
the establishment of the new space economy by:

  • Developing mutually beneficial partnerships among industry, universities, nonprofits, and government
  • Serving as the catalyst between NASA and entrepreneurial space organizations to promote
    commercial space development
  • Organizing and executing pioneering developments and demonstrations that open new markets
  • Supporting space activities that benefit the public
  • Promoting increased demand for space exploration
  • Acting as the “friendly front door,” the Space Portal will help make NASA space infrastructure
    available for commercial development
  • Image 1 of 9      Next >

    Return to Article

    View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
    <<  <  Page 2/2
    Rob Spiegel
    User Rank
    Blogger
    Re: Yes, we need to go back
    Rob Spiegel   8/14/2013 11:23:34 AM
    NO RATINGS
    I agree, Nancy, the space program has lost touch with the public. The Mars rover was pretty exciting, but I don't know what NASA's plans are. When I was a kid, everyone knew NASA's plans.

    Nancy Golden
    User Rank
    Platinum
    Re: Yes, we need to go back
    Nancy Golden   8/14/2013 10:59:10 AM
    NO RATINGS
    I think part of the problem is lack of public interest and NASA is dropping the ball in this area. One of my most unforgettable experiences was visiting an open house at the John son Space Center. It was geared to families and areas normally closed to the public where opened. My son got to shake hands with Rick Husbands and there were several shuttle astronauts available for autographs. We got to see moon rocks up close as well as go in a simulator. The event lasted all day and was a highlight for our entire family. It was filled with families and was an obvious success attendance-wise. Of course we went home with a model shuttle craft with a remote control and all the bells and whistles, serving to stimulate my then pre-schoolers imagination and love for all things space. Since then over the years, I have checked with NASA about there next open house only to find they had stopped doing them. We need to bring the excitement of space back to a generation that is so desensitized   to its incredible beauty due to the nature of computer graphics that makes them feel like they have already seen everything. When you take a kid out into the country so that they feel like they can actually reach up and touch the stars, it changes their perspective. Introduce them to the real workings of space technology, it generates excitement. We need more public exposure to these sort of things!

    Rob Spiegel
    User Rank
    Blogger
    Re: Yes, we need to go back
    Rob Spiegel   8/14/2013 10:47:26 AM
    NO RATINGS
    Naperlou, I wonder if the sluggishness of development at NASA is because there is no outside impending deadline. The moonshot was driven by the desire to beat the Soviets to the moon -- that plus Kennedy's "end of the decade" challenge. What would force a deadline now? Nothing really. 

    naperlou
    User Rank
    Blogger
    Yes, we need to go back
    naperlou   8/14/2013 9:37:48 AM
    NO RATINGS
    Over the years I worked in space applications.  Many of them were military, but several were NASA programs.  The amount of technology developed for these programs was tremendous.  On the other hand, they take way too long.  I will give you an example.  I worked on the ISS in the 1980s (it may not have had the I back then).  I found that there were people on out team that had worked on it in the 1970s.  What was eventually launched was not much different from what we could have launched in the 1980s.  The point is that people tend to fall away from these programs becuase they take several times longer that they need to.  I believe that this is part of the reason that programs do not get the public support they need. 

    Another issue is that NASA often limits the technology used to play it safe (and I am not talking about crew safety).  This means that the technology launched is often obsolete before it goes up.  NASA needs to change, but in addition, we need to provide funding in a more reliable way.  That means we either have to say, we will spend this much, or that we will have goals that we are trying to reach, and fund those.  I don't see either happening any time soon.

    <<  <  Page 2/2
    Partner Zone
    More Blogs from Guest Blogs
    As additive manufacturing (including 3D printing) becomes increasingly popular among businesses as a quick and easy solution to creating and evaluating prototypes and end-use products, the debate about whether to outsource production or to purchase equipment for in-house use is at the forefront of industry discussions.
    With increasing terrorist threats overseas, organizations are thinking about how best to defend themselves here and abroad. Engineering can play a role, especially when it comes to putting a barrier between yourself and the bad guys.
    Time to market is everything, but at the same time, you can’t sacrifice quality for speed. That’s where additive manufacturing comes into play.
    In the last few years, use of CFD in building design has increased manifolds. Computational fluid dynamics is effective in analyzing the flow and thermal properties of air within spaces. It can be used in buildings to find the best measures for comfortable temperature at low energy use.
    Feature-advantage-benefit could help engineers in how we approach design problems, how we sell our ideas to management, and how we market ourselves when it comes to jobs.
    Design News Webinar Series
    10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
    9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
    9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
    7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
    Quick Poll
    The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
    Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
    SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


    Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
    Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
    Sponsored by Stratasys
    Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
    Sponsored by Gates Corporation
    Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
    Sponsored by Littelfuse
    Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
    Twitter Feed
    Design News Twitter Feed
    Like Us on Facebook

    Sponsored Content

    Technology Marketplace

    Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service