HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

Circuit Protection by the Numbers

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Threaded|Newest First|Oldest First
tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Good Article
tekochip   9/18/2012 9:14:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the article.  Engineers often overlook circuit protection and because it's not as straightforward as it appears.  To make matters even more complicated, as you pointed out, there are many products available with similar ratings but very different performance.  Fuse selection is also dependent on tests that may be performed for agency approval.  I once had to increase the size of a fuse a very small appliance because the MOV in the power supply was pulling a great deal of current during Fast Transient Burst testing.  The appliance only needed fractional current, but in order to pass FTB I had to increase the fuse size to an Amp or more.


SparkyWatt
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Good Article
SparkyWatt   10/17/2012 1:44:59 PM
NO RATINGS
If you want to get parametric about it (an approach that makes more sense to me than these arbitrary fast/slow ratings), your typical fuse has two parameters of importance: The current that will raise it to its melting temperature (Imax) and the energy required to melt it (usually expressed in current and time, I²t).  Using the second requires evaluating an integral, but it can be approximated pretty easily.

One of the most common errors I see in circuit protection is when wires are sized according to the load, instead of the protection.  You see it all the time, you get a lamp fed by these little tiny wires.  If you ask about it, the answer always is "the lamp will never draw that much."  True, but if you short the lamp, the wire explodes.  Wires should be sized according to the available current, not the expected current.  If you want to use smaller wires, the available current should be limited first.

OLD_CURMUDGEON
User Rank
Platinum
Circuit Protection By the Numbers...
OLD_CURMUDGEON   9/19/2012 2:02:26 PM
NO RATINGS
TJ:

Would it be OK to use a BUSSMANN fuse instead of the Littelfuse in your applications?

On the serious side ...... A GREAT short article to explain the importance of selecting the proper circuit protection device rating.  It SHOULD be required archiving for EVERY engineer/designer who has any involvement with circuit protection.

On that note, here's an interesting story from my annals.....

We had built an extensive temperature-control system for a large home appliance manufacturer.  They had recently converted a critical component of an appliance from a metal unit to an injection-molded piece.  The plant supply was basically 480/ 3-phase Delta service.  The heaters are rated at 240.  Our equipment was designed for the typical 240 service, BUT we also had available an accessory kit for those installations where the mains were 440-480.

When the unit arrived, it was connected by the plant electricians, and set to go.  However, it was NOT energized initially because other equipment was not yet installed.  When the day finally arrived to power up, the primary side fuses blew immediately (with MUCH gusto, I was told!)  When the plant electrician did some preliminary investigation, he discovered that SOMEONE (in our plant) had supplied a set of SUPER FAST-BLOW, CLASS H style fuses in the main disconnect, instead of the RK5 fuses.  Obviously, THIS error was the problem.  The electrician called our company to inquire, and we apologized for the error, and sent a couple of sets of correct fuses as a token of our appreciation.  Once that error was corrected, the temperature controller worked as advertised for years WITHOUT further problems.

 

Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
Igus retrofitted a car with 56 of its plastic iglide bearings to celebrate the brand's 30th anniversary. The car is currently being driven across the US and Canada.
The first and most obvious lesson of the following story is to remember to consider creep, along with all other potential failure modes.
Medical devices will look and feel different in the next 20 years, because, as design and product development people, our criteria are changing.
The properties of stainless steel make it well suited for a wide range of applications, but many of the things engineers think they know about stainless steel aren’t true.
It seems that gears have been around forever -- what could be new?
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 18 - 22, Embedded Software Development With Python & the Raspberry Pi
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by igus
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service