HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

Reducing Risk Through Integrated Advanced Development

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/2
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
RE: the 5% rule
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   3/8/2012 12:50:22 AM
NO RATINGS

I should have replied to your post, but instead started an independent comment on this article.  I should have replied because I'm drawn to your comments as if you read my mind; it seems we have worked in the same places.  See my independent post a few paragraphs down the link, entitled, "Advance Dev is a seperate Group." Thanks for your comments!

Bill Devenish
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Advance Dev is a seperate Group.
Bill Devenish   3/8/2012 11:58:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Many companies I have worked with don't have the resources available for a separate group focused on Advanced Development. They barely have sufficient development resources to introduce new products with tight schedule constraints.  Therfore, allowing the development engineers a small portion of their time to investigate targeted technologies helps mitigate the risks to schedule and product quality. For Advanced Development to be effective I think it takes the commitment of visionary leadership and a management team who can see the big picture. For those companies that have the ability to support a separate Advanced Development team it becomes crucial that they provide for a smooth transition of the acquired knowledge to the product design team.

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Advance Dev is a seperate Group.
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   3/8/2012 1:05:49 PM
NO RATINGS

Bill, I agree that a segregated AdvDev team takes big bucks – that's why I prefaced my comment with my history of working in giant corporations that are household names. They have the cash to afford that. Further, I concur to your point that transition of AdvDev into the product groups is a critical transition that often has roadblocks.  I have lived that, as well.  (the "NIH" {Not Invented Here} syndrome drives engineering egos all  too often).

All of your points, I have to say, are good valid approaches which I would also encourage smaller companies to try.  Except, in reality, the shared-time concept (the 5% idea) is theory not often successfully reduced to practice. 

gsmith120
User Rank
Platinum
RE: the 5% rule
gsmith120   3/8/2012 6:50:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Bob, I agree with your comments on design reviews.  Early in my career I was with a company that was really good about holding design reviews at multi-levels, inviting the right people and we always got really good feedback.  Now most companies I deal with believe "design review" is a dirty word or don't know what it mean.

Some common things I've found are companies don't hold design reviews, material is distributed at the design review or a day in advance, design is given to one independent person to review.  Trying to explain that people need time to review the material or even explain the importance of a design review was taking more years off my life they it was worth.

I don't think enough importance is put on design reviews, having the right people, providing sufficient time to review material to get good feedback can save a company time and money.  Ideally design reviews attendees are invited because their expertise is needed in a specific area, so what I would do is highlight for each attendee's specific area I would like them to review, if they didn't have time to review the entire package.  What I found was most would make time to review their specific area.  Otherwise, more times than not they wouldn't review anything.  I tell people if you have a review with no action items then most likely they didn't review the material.  When will some compaies learn pay me now or pay me later and if you pay me later it will cost you a lot more.

gsmith120
User Rank
Platinum
RE: the 5% rule
gsmith120   3/8/2012 6:54:53 PM
NO RATINGS
The 5% rule sounds great!! But like Bob said not in today's world.  I've had companies start out with something like that but it soon got lost in the "everything is HOT" so that 5% got eaten up by you trying to put out fires or just keep up with the daily duties. 

 

 

<<  <  Page 2/2
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
There are drivers everywhere who turn on their headlights or windshield wipers with no awareness of the development effort behind a switch. Yet from freezing winter to sweltering summer, on dull rainy days and in bright sunshine, switches are expected to function consistently for the lifetime of a car.
Jet engine maker Pratt & Whitney sees additive manufacturing as a production approach that's complementary to -- not a replacement for -- traditional manufacturing processes.
The standards electrical machines and components are required to meet in the food processing industry are far more stringent than those in traditional plant construction. For specialized production environments such as these, components must not only resist thermal and physical stresses, but they must also be resistant to the chemicals used to sterilize equipment.
The word “smart” is becoming the dumbest word around. It has been applied to almost every device and system in our homes. In addition to smartphones and smart meters, we now hear about smart clothing and smart shoes, smart lights, smart homes, smart buildings, and every trendy city today has its smart city project. Just because it has a computer inside and is connected to the Web, does not mean it is smart.
Was Steve Job’s signature outfit of a black turtleneck, jeans, and sneakers the secret behind his success? Maybe, or maybe not, but it was likely an indication of a decision-making philosophy that enabled him to become one of the most successful innovators of all time.
Design News Webinar Series
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Mar 9 - 13, Implementing Motor Control Designs with MCUs and FPGAs: An Introduction and Update
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service