HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

Congress Is Working on an Energy Bill… Again

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Threaded|Newest First|Oldest First
ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Not any more
ttemple   5/14/2014 10:44:35 AM
NO RATINGS
I think as of yesterday they aren't debating this bill.  Maybe next time.

GTOlover
User Rank
Platinum
What I think
GTOlover   5/14/2014 2:25:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Anytime you start an article with "Congress" anything after that is lost. These clowns cannot even agree to disagree! And it usually means that I have to pay more so some big business can pedal the latest green initiative!

John Malinowski
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What I think
John Malinowski   5/14/2014 2:30:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Correct on Shaheen-Portman. It was defeated on vote this week. But it still has many lives, look for it during the lame duck session at the end of the year.

Arden Dulou
User Rank
Silver
Jobs, but at what cost?
Arden Dulou   5/15/2014 9:17:30 AM
NO RATINGS
The question is what type of jobs? Are these more government jobs? We do not need more government jobs. The taxpayers can't afford to pay for more government workers. How is Congress forcing the creation of jobs a good thing? Nope. Let the market work.

LetoAtreidesII
User Rank
Platinum
More goverment Bable
LetoAtreidesII   5/16/2014 8:32:09 AM
NO RATINGS
If you follow the link and read the paper about this bill this is what you get.

How? By doing more with less, meeting people's need for heat, cold, light, and electronics while using less energy. The measures in Shaheen-Portman include provisions to:
  • Help states improve their building energy codes and implement them more effectively;
  • Consider the energy efficiency of homes when underwriting mortgages to recognize that families that pay lower energy bills can afford a slightly higher mortgage payment;
  • Strengthen federal assistance to industry to improve competitiveness by making plants more efficient; and
  • Other provisions, including on public energy use information for commercial buildings and on efficiency in federal data centers, schools, and more.

So basically it more of our money to creat more programs and more force to make the people do what theny think we should.  On top of that putting our money into creating these programs they then expect us to put in more money to actually carry out these efforts. 

How does anybody support more of this bable.  If a company will be improved competitvely by makeing effeciency changes then let them decide and do it (which if the Co wants to grow and stay they will)  We do not need big brother telling us what to do.

On the jobs created you have to ask were the money is going to come from for these jobs.  Everyone always forgets if you spend money here (on improvng energy effeciency) then you are not spending it on spmething else that would create other jobs often times more jobs.  Again please let people use their common sense to decide were their own money is best suited to go more often than not they will make far bettery decisions than 15 goverment minders and programs could do.

End of Rant

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More goverment Bable
Cabe Atwell   5/16/2014 5:00:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, the bill will probably not pass or even be debated on for that matter unless it's backed by lobbyists from major corporations. 

Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
FPGAs are the glue logic in today's systems, but what they glue together are a variety of diverse sub-systems with different interface requirements.
What should be the perception of a product’s real-world performance with regard to the published spec sheet? While it is easy to assume that the product will operate according to spec, what variables should be considered, and is that a designer obligation or a customer responsibility? Or both?
Procurement actually means well. There is no question that procurement can do a better job of phrasing their questions or making connections between engineering’s goals and the processes underway. And if you are using the right deciphering code, the result can live up to -- or surpass -- your expectations.
Internal combustion engines are ruling power generation applications even today, and improvising them to churn out every slice of power is still an area of research for the engineering community.
If you are interested in adding FPGA technology to you engineering toolkit, grab some free tools and an evaluation kit and get started on your own FPGA project. It never hurts to expand your engineering toolbox, and FPGAs are only going to become more popular over the next few years.
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 26 - 30, IPv6 for Micros – Hands-On
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Stratasys
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service