HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

Congress Is Working on an Energy Bill… Again

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Not any more
ttemple   5/14/2014 10:44:35 AM
NO RATINGS
I think as of yesterday they aren't debating this bill.  Maybe next time.

GTOlover
User Rank
Platinum
What I think
GTOlover   5/14/2014 2:25:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Anytime you start an article with "Congress" anything after that is lost. These clowns cannot even agree to disagree! And it usually means that I have to pay more so some big business can pedal the latest green initiative!

John Malinowski
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What I think
John Malinowski   5/14/2014 2:30:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Correct on Shaheen-Portman. It was defeated on vote this week. But it still has many lives, look for it during the lame duck session at the end of the year.

Arden Dulou
User Rank
Silver
Jobs, but at what cost?
Arden Dulou   5/15/2014 9:17:30 AM
NO RATINGS
The question is what type of jobs? Are these more government jobs? We do not need more government jobs. The taxpayers can't afford to pay for more government workers. How is Congress forcing the creation of jobs a good thing? Nope. Let the market work.

LetoAtreidesII
User Rank
Platinum
More goverment Bable
LetoAtreidesII   5/16/2014 8:32:09 AM
NO RATINGS
If you follow the link and read the paper about this bill this is what you get.

How? By doing more with less, meeting people's need for heat, cold, light, and electronics while using less energy. The measures in Shaheen-Portman include provisions to:
  • Help states improve their building energy codes and implement them more effectively;
  • Consider the energy efficiency of homes when underwriting mortgages to recognize that families that pay lower energy bills can afford a slightly higher mortgage payment;
  • Strengthen federal assistance to industry to improve competitiveness by making plants more efficient; and
  • Other provisions, including on public energy use information for commercial buildings and on efficiency in federal data centers, schools, and more.

So basically it more of our money to creat more programs and more force to make the people do what theny think we should.  On top of that putting our money into creating these programs they then expect us to put in more money to actually carry out these efforts. 

How does anybody support more of this bable.  If a company will be improved competitvely by makeing effeciency changes then let them decide and do it (which if the Co wants to grow and stay they will)  We do not need big brother telling us what to do.

On the jobs created you have to ask were the money is going to come from for these jobs.  Everyone always forgets if you spend money here (on improvng energy effeciency) then you are not spending it on spmething else that would create other jobs often times more jobs.  Again please let people use their common sense to decide were their own money is best suited to go more often than not they will make far bettery decisions than 15 goverment minders and programs could do.

End of Rant

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More goverment Bable
Cabe Atwell   5/16/2014 5:00:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, the bill will probably not pass or even be debated on for that matter unless it's backed by lobbyists from major corporations. 

Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
Feature-advantage-benefit could help engineers in how we approach design problems, how we sell our ideas to management, and how we market ourselves when it comes to jobs.
Many diverse markets take advantage of semiconductor IP; so many that no one can recite the entire list without leaving off several. So why do we track all the vertical markets? They all have a unique set of requirements and value attributes differently. One major vertical market segment is automotive.
Watch BMW's newest electric car, the i3, being charged with an everyday Home Depot-rented, gas-powered generator.
Asking yourself the simple question, “Is this a strength problem or a stiffness problem?” can prevent many design mistakes.
In November, a European space probe will try to land on the surface of a comet moving at about 84,000 mph and rotating with a period of 12.7 hours. Many factors make positioning the probe for the landing an engineering challenge.
Design News Webinar Series
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 22 - 26, MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide (Using a Real Eval Board)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service