HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

PCB Design & Layout on a Budget

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: cad packages
tekochip   11/23/2013 8:38:35 AM
NO RATINGS
DOD, Days of DOS.
 
I used PADS back then, and my favorite part of the package was that it had an animated splash screen at the start of the program.  The animation must have been coded with loop delays because whenever I bought a faster computer the animation would speed up.  The last machine I used with PADS was a 486/50Mhz, and the animation was flying by so fast that you couldn't see the little arrows anymore.  Oooooh, yea, my blinding, fast 486/50.


Orin Laney
User Rank
Silver
cad packages
Orin Laney   11/21/2013 2:30:08 AM
NO RATINGS
Oracd has been my choice of schematic capture since the days of DOS.  I'm on 9.2 at the moment.  Tried the 16.2 capture demo and found little that I didn't already have.  Orcad lets me export a netlist to anything that'll take one (which is every professional tool), and a netlist is also at times a customer deliverable, so this is a gotta have feature. 

For PWB layout (it's not a PCB until components are added), I've done very well with FreePCB after learning how to add to and maintain the library files.  I'd go to PADS but I'm already happy.

Tried Autotrax but the schematic symbols are goofy and it's a closed system in terms of netlists. I stay the heck away from tools, free or not, that not only can't export or import a netlist between capture and layout but also lock you into one PWB vendor.

 

dmckenney
User Rank
Iron
PCB layout
dmckenney   11/19/2013 11:15:48 AM
NO RATINGS
I work for a small company and we've been using Autotrax DEX.  It has been fun using the tool as it has grown and added capabilities.  It is great for simple boards, and can handle complex boards.  It has an awesome 3D capability that enables accurate mechanical enclosure design around it.  It exports the boards to 3D formats that enable selling tools for products as well.  It is a great, inexpensive package.

oldguywithtoys
User Rank
Silver
Re: Simple Works
oldguywithtoys   11/19/2013 10:22:10 AM
NO RATINGS
In a similar vein, I started with OrCAD for schematics back when it was available for under $500 from a "quick ad" at the back of Electronic Design.  I stayed with it for my own use, buying their "Layout Limited" (no autorouter) at release 7. I'm currently at release 9 for schematics, still at 7 for layout (they dropped the "Limited" version, making it too expensive to upgrade), after which I simply stopped upgrading: it had gotten too expensive. Meanwhile my employer used, at first, CadStar.  It was too expensive for them to give each engineer a seat, so we drew schematics with pencil-on-vellum, which a dedicated CAD draftsman would copy into CadStar.  When I started turning in printed pages of my OrCAD-drawn schematics and comparing OrCAD-generated netlists with CadStar netlists (rather than comparing schematics and using a yellow hi-liter) to check the draftsman's work, our VP of Engineering bought OrCAD for all the EEs.  Meanwhile, I'd learned to use CadStar board layout.  Then we went to PADS for board layout and I learned that.  A change in employers brought me to Altium.

It's fairly easy to move one's skillset from one schematic/PCB package to another, difficult to move actual designs without redrawing them or spending a lot on translation software (sometimes more than the CAD package itself).  The expensive CAD providers seem to go out of their way to make it difficult.  I look at Eagle's pricing with lust in my heart, but I have 30+ years of legacy designs in OrCAD to maintain.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Simple Works
tekochip   11/18/2013 9:26:38 AM
NO RATINGS
I've been using Eagle for more years that I should admit to.  I've never needed 3D modeling on my circuit boards, and any simulation is usually performed by another software package, or even off of vendor's websites.  I'm sometimes generating a design a week, and Eagle has never left me with an unconnected node or an unseen overlap.  The tool is cheap enough that I was able to buy a seat for everyone in the company, and for the more adventurous you can even write your own scripts and user language programs.
 
There are certainly glitzier tools, but you could probably learn to create a schematic and generate Gerbers in less than a day with Eagle.


Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
What should be the perception of a productís real-world performance with regard to the published spec sheet? While it is easy to assume that the product will operate according to spec, what variables should be considered, and is that a designer obligation or a customer responsibility? Or both?
Procurement actually means well. There is no question that procurement can do a better job of phrasing their questions or making connections between engineeringís goals and the processes underway. And if you are using the right deciphering code, the result can live up to -- or surpass -- your expectations.
Internal combustion engines are ruling power generation applications even today, and improvising them to churn out every slice of power is still an area of research for the engineering community.
If you are interested in adding FPGA technology to you engineering toolkit, grab some free tools and an evaluation kit and get started on your own FPGA project. It never hurts to expand your engineering toolbox, and FPGAs are only going to become more popular over the next few years.
With the growing demand for new-age applications, corrosion has become an inherent problem. Not only do epoxies confer excellent corrosion resistance, they are also easy to handle and process. However, one must be mindful of selecting the right epoxy system along with the appropriate application techniques for best results.
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 26 - 30, IPv6 for Micros Ė Hands-On
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Stratasys
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service