HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

How to Be a 'Doctor of Engineering' Without Going to Grad School

View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Docs and Sherlock
Ann R. Thryft   11/4/2013 12:41:32 PM
NO RATINGS
When I eventually encountered formal troubleshooting procedures, the most obvious thing that struck me was that it's basically reversing the process of setting up the equipment, so you simply follow a logical order.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Docs and Sherlock
Dave Palmer   10/29/2013 9:39:26 PM
NO RATINGS
@Ann: Glad you liked the article.  Actually, I was recently re-reading the Sherlock Holmes books; there are definitely a lot of Holmes' methods that can be applied to engineering.  And you're right that checking the obvious things first (i.e. is it plugged in?) is an important step that is sometimes overlooked by otherwise smart people.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Docs and Sherlock
Ann R. Thryft   10/29/2013 2:16:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for an interesting and thoughtful essay, Dave. I hadn't thought about the similarity with a doctor's process for troubleshooting, but I have thought about the similarity with Sherlock Holmes' methods. In fact, that's probably where I started learning how to think analytically to solve problems in mechanical or electrical systems. The next stage was much later as a young adult, working with my stereo system, when I encountered the basic rules of troubleshooting electrical systems, with the first steps always being: Is it plugged into the wall? Is it switched on? Are all the cords hooked together correctly and are any of them frayed or defective?

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
How to be that "doctor of engineering"
William K.   10/25/2013 9:18:20 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems that the more valuable doctor of engineering would be the doctor of science of engineering, as opposed to the doctor of philosophy type doctor. You may have noticed that your medical and dental doctors hold a doctor of science degree, while the HR troll may hold a doctor of philosophy degree in finance or management, or basketweaving. What the PHD means is that they have completed some research project, it does not mean that they have developed any insight or understanding. Some do, many don't.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Doctor of engineering??
William K.   10/25/2013 9:12:10 PM
NO RATINGS
My diagnostic technique is a bit different: First observe how the system is functioning while understanding how the system should be functioning. Often this does require making measurements and collecting a bit of data. second, given that the area of malfunction is observed, consider which portions of the system affect that function, and observe how they are functioning compared to how they should be functioning. With adequate understanding of the system operation this should point to the source of the problem.

The challenge being that this method of diagnostics requires a great deal of understanding and insight, and so it is not simple to use by the unknowing.

OLD_CURMUDGEON
User Rank
Platinum
HOUSE, M.D.
OLD_CURMUDGEON   10/24/2013 12:02:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Anyone who was a devotee of the TV show, HOUSE, M.D. in the recent past would immediately recognise this form of deductive reasoning.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Wild Horses
Rob Spiegel   10/23/2013 8:09:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Critic, that's a good video.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Limitations of the doctor model
Dave Palmer   10/23/2013 2:32:23 PM
NO RATINGS
@streetrodder: Great comments.  Clearly, there are limitations to the analogy between engineers and doctors.  What impressed me, though, is that doctors are explicitly trained in a disciplined problem-solving methodology.  This isn't usually done in engineering education.  In engineering school, there is often little or no discussion of how to approach and solve problems generally, and a lot of focus on tools for specific kinds of problems.

To some extent, this is because disciplined problem-solving is second nature to most engineers, as you and other commenters have pointed out.  However, I think there's a lot of value in having a clear framework for thinking about the process of problem solving.

wbswenberg
User Rank
Gold
Re: Limitations of the doctor model
wbswenberg   10/23/2013 12:53:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, we usually assume it was working prior to breaking down.  My first days at the E company.  They wanted me to fix the ATE without opening the patient.  I soon convinced them and a bond of trust developed.

streetrodder
User Rank
Gold
Limitations of the doctor model
streetrodder   10/23/2013 10:57:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Good morning all.

 

I found the blog and comments interesting.  Not surprising and somewhat limited, though.

I recently retired as a biomedical engineer working for a very large healthcare system.  I found first hand the limitations of the medical school model.  First and foremost, it's based on the assumption that there's prior history of the problem.  In field service, that's the case only for obvious failures.  For those tricky problems. there often is no prior history.   Also, documentation on the system under analysis is limited - equipment documentation is only available if it was a requirement at the time of purchase (imagine, if you will, that the patient refuses to tell you what's wrong, and there's no access to the equipment equivalent of anatomy and physiology books).  Now, imagine being in the OR, trying to diagnose and fix the problem, while the 'parent is looking over your shoulder asking "What's wrong, how soon will it be fixxed?"  The very talented technician is a far better problem solver than a doctor.

I recall in incident at one hospital where an invasive radiology system went down.  Our tech is in there troubleshooting away (fully aware that the failure is delaying patient care).  The Chief of Radiology is asking why he hasn't identified the problem and fixxed it.  That's when it hit me:  Doctors are trained on prior knowledge - there is a limited number of failures (illnesses) they need to focus on.  If there's an illness outside of their knowledge base, they perform extensive research and/or referral the patient.  And take several days/weeks/months/years to fix the problem.

In field service, the techs need to diagnose and repair problems that may have never occured before, with limited knowledge and often limited/non-existent documentation of the "patient's" anatomy and physiology.  All within, at best, a few hours, while the 'parent' is looking over their shoulder.. 

 

 

Page 1/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
More often than not, with the purchase of a sports car comes the sacrifice of any sort of utility. In other words, you can forget about a large trunk, extra seats for the kids, and more importantly driving in snowy (or inclement) weather. But what if there was a vehicle that offered the best of both worlds; great handling and practicality?
As additive manufacturing (including 3D printing) becomes increasingly popular among businesses as a quick and easy solution to creating and evaluating prototypes and end-use products, the debate about whether to outsource production or to purchase equipment for in-house use is at the forefront of industry discussions.
With increasing terrorist threats overseas, organizations are thinking about how best to defend themselves here and abroad. Engineering can play a role, especially when it comes to putting a barrier between yourself and the bad guys.
Time to market is everything, but at the same time, you cant sacrifice quality for speed. Thats where additive manufacturing comes into play.
In the last few years, use of CFD in building design has increased manifolds. Computational fluid dynamics is effective in analyzing the flow and thermal properties of air within spaces. It can be used in buildings to find the best measures for comfortable temperature at low energy use.
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Nov 3 - 7, Engineering Principles behind Advanced User Interface Technologies
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service