HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

Do You Need On-Machine Motion Solutions?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
kf2qd
User Rank
Platinum
Re: On-Machine Motion
kf2qd   5/14/2013 9:29:59 AM
NO RATINGS
One problem I can see, from the tecnicians point of view - this puts more pieces in places that may be very inaccessable. I have built, installed and serviced industrial machines, and while it may make assembly and install a bit faster, it makes servicing the machine that much harder. It also means that the motor (withthe drive attached) also gets more expensive. Most cabinet mounted drives can detect problems and shut down to potect the drive and other components. Perhaps a motor has a bad bearing or other failure. Replace just a motor. Integrated motor and drive means that the whole package - more expensive - must be replaced.

 

You still need to run cables - raw power and control signals, so you still have to deal with cables and connections.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
On-Machine Motion
apresher   5/14/2013 8:57:18 AM
NO RATINGS
One limiting factor with integrated drive-motors is the availability of higher power solutions.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: On-machine solutions
TJ McDermott   5/14/2013 1:10:44 AM
NO RATINGS
One significant stumbling block to single-package servo/drives is the environment in which they would be used.

In packaging machinery especially, such a combined servo/drive could be subjected to sanitary washdowns that routinely destroy components.

The IP69K standard of environmental rating was developed to describe what happens in such a washdown.  1000 psi directed jets of water at 180 degrees F is not to be brushed off.

Putting the servo drive in this environment means the cost of component includes the drive, not just the motor.

Very few servo motor manufacturers are willing to rate their motors for such extremes, let alone the drive.

 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: On-machine solutions
Charles Murray   5/13/2013 7:47:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Great post, Jim. I'm curious, though: The advantages of on-machine seem so obvious, it makes me wonder why we're even having the discussion. Has on-machine not been the norm up to now? If not, why not? 

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
On-Machine Motion
apresher   5/13/2013 3:11:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Excellent post.  It's easy to see that the combination of integrated drive motors, distributed controllers and I/O plus new wiring options arechanging the architecture of machines. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. I would think that more and more companies will be looking to eliminate the larger control cabinets that have been a necessary part of machinery design for a long time.  Thanks.

Jim Grosskreuz
User Rank
Blogger
Re: On-machine solutions
Jim Grosskreuz   5/13/2013 2:20:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, Thanks for your interest.  Yes, on-machine solutions are becoming more prevelent as OEMs and end users become more aware of the value of the solution. We see this technology being deployed in both new machines and plants, and also in existing installations as well.  The value in existing plants comes from that ability to add to existing machine easliy, without increasing cabinet space requirements.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
On-machine solutions
Rob Spiegel   5/13/2013 9:52:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Hey, Jim. Interesting article. Are the on-machine solutions getting much traction in plants yet? The customization possibilities alone seem like they would justify going in this direction. Is this development mostly applicable to greenfield installations, or, are you also seeing on-machine showing up in existing plants?

Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
Today, no matter where in the world the device is located, it can call home and ask for the latest-and-greatest firmware with bug fixes and feature updates.
A decade from now, firmware development may be nothing more than software integration, grabbing vendor and third-party components, and meshing their APIs together to form a final system.
Design, simulation, manufacturability, and prototyping: All of these phases are being pushed forward and progressively by underlying technologies.
From design feasibility, to development, to production, having the right information to make good decisions can ultimately keep a product from failing validation. The key is highly focused information that doesn’t come from conventional, statistics-based tests but from accelerated stress testing.
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 6 - 10, Building Raspberry Pi Controllers with Python
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service