HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

Floodlights in the Spotlight

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Page 1/2  >  >>
Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Thanks for shedding light on this (pun intended :))
Elizabeth M   2/21/2013 10:42:35 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for this article, Emily. It's good to see the potential for LEDs on this kind of grand scale, and I like your cost-comparison breakdown. I think sometimes people just see the initial price tag and think short-term without realizing the long-term cost savings. While it's good to live in the moment, when it comes to saving energy and reducing any type of pollution, I think it's far better to think ahead a bit.

sensor pro
User Rank
Gold
Re: Thanks for shedding light on this (pun intended :))
sensor pro   2/21/2013 10:58:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Obviously LSDs have huge future potenial and hey are more and more popular with general users,however the price is still abit high.  Also all hat circuitry inside has to be somehow hadled after he bulb is done.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Thanks for shedding light on this (pun intended :))
Charles Murray   2/21/2013 11:44:33 AM
NO RATINGS
I like the comparisons between the LEDs and halogen bulbs. It really puts in perspective and makes me wonder why I haven't been using more LEDs. Great article.

Pubudu
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Thanks for shedding light on this (pun intended :))
Pubudu   2/21/2013 12:46:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Dear Emily thanks for your High-light about the Spot-light,


From the every point of view such as Energy usage, Durability, Production, Etc   LED lighting is better than the halogen lighting except the PRICE.


If it can be address in a positive way transformation from halogen to LED will be very fast thanks to Oleg Losev (1927)



NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Thanks for shedding light on this (pun intended :))
NadineJ   2/21/2013 3:53:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree.  Nicely done.

It would be interesting to see a video showing Central New York Raceway Park before (with halogen) and after (with LED).  The look and feel of the lights is very different.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Floodlights in Spotlight
apresher   2/21/2013 5:23:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Excellent analysis. Even with all of the push behind LEDs, not too many decisions will be based on the facts (cost plus operating expenses) although you would expect commercial projects to take these factors into consideration.  Thanks.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Thanks for shedding light on this (pun intended :))
Elizabeth M   2/22/2013 4:46:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, Chuck, it really clearly shows the difference--one of the best descriptions I've seen so far and gives a good perspective on why making the switch is more energy efficient and cost effective.

cadcoke5
User Rank
Iron
Eco-friendly stuff tends to exaggerate claims
cadcoke5   2/22/2013 8:57:07 AM
NO RATINGS
There has been some histry in regards to "eco-friendly" claims, where claims didn't hold up to the test of time. 

I am specifically refering to the earlier compact fluroescent bulbs, which were suppose to last 10 years, but in reality only lasted about a year in many common usage situations.  At $10/each, the user was expected to invest a substantial amount of money in a technology that had not withstood the test of time.

LED lighting certainly is an interesting technology, but it has not proven its true longevity yet.  Government mandates are the driving force behind LED lighting, rather than successful real-world success. It has also forced manufaturing of light sources to another country. So, how much should we trust this technology?

True, there are applications where it has really proven cost effective, such as in traffic lights.  But, my advice is to allow others to test this high-dollar technology that is rapidly changing. Holding off a year or two will dramatically reduce the cost, and increase confidence in the investment.


Joe Dunfee

3drob
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Eco-friendly stuff tends to exaggerate claims
3drob   2/22/2013 9:14:42 AM
NO RATINGS
I've been trying to invest in LED lighting for almost a decade now.  The promise of higher MTBF has been (to date) marketing hyperbole.  They should last longer (in theory at least), but in reality they simply don't.  Indoor and outdoor are both the same.  Incompatibility with existing home automation equipment (most of which, such as X10, has simple Triac outputs) limits their usefulness even more (and NO, dimmable doesn't mean compatible).

The real change in the market has been their dropping cost along with their increasing lumens.  This makes the disconnect between the MTBF claims and reality a little more palatable.

mpanle
User Rank
Iron
Emily Banham, Murden-SEO Article
mpanle   2/22/2013 10:21:19 AM
NO RATINGS
The LED light life at 50,000 hours running 8 hours a day is 17.1 years.

This yields a better payback and over the life of the lamp than others.

Page 1/2  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
We Have FPGAs with On-chip MCUs, but How About MCUs with On-chip FPGAs?
Programmable logic has come a long way from the simple devices we started out with. Remember Programmable Array Logic, or PALs? But where will we be in the next five to 10 years?
As industrial applications increasingly use process control systems utilizing sensor feedbacks to monitor various operating parameters, energy sources and consumption are becoming major factors of a system.
By asking more in-depth questions and providing customers with richer design data, distribution salespeople can quickly build credibility and help customers to avoid potential problems when they specify high-performance plastics.
Recent enhancements in rechargeable and primary (non-rechargeable) battery technologies enable industrial devices to perform beyond the limitations of legacy consumer batteries.
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service