HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Guest Blogs

5 Common Failure Analysis Mistakes

< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Great practical advice
Beth Stackpole   4/26/2012 7:10:52 AM
NO RATINGS
I always enjoy your posts, Dave. They really take on a problem and put into real world context without any of the hype or confusion that can cloud the issues. This is a perfect example. Maybe not any "rocket science" takeaway here, but some real sound advice for engineers on the common traps most fall into when trying to come to the root cause of a part failure or better yet, avoiding failure to start with.

 

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
troubleshooting
GlennA   4/26/2012 9:07:35 AM
NO RATINGS
Although I haven't been involved in formal failure analysis, I have often been called to troubleshoot problems.  Often the most senior person involved 'declared' what the root cause was.  After I finished my troubleshooting, I had often proven that the 'expert' was wrong.  Seniority doesn't automatically mean that you know all of the intricacies.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Kitchen Sink
TJ McDermott   4/26/2012 10:26:12 AM
NO RATINGS
When the downtime costs thousands of dollars per minute, throwing the kitchen sink at a failure is sometimes the only way.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Great practical advice
Ann R. Thryft   4/26/2012 1:53:53 PM
NO RATINGS

I agree with Beth. Dave, thanks for such a clear overview. The principles you discuss here seem simple and obvious in hindsight, yet somehow can be easily forgotten even by well educated and well trained pros. They parallel\ some of the basic electrical system troubleshooting principles I learned from one of my engineer buddies years ago, which I apply mostly to my multi-component stereo system.


Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Great practical advice
Dave Palmer   4/26/2012 3:29:22 PM
NO RATINGS
@Beth: Thanks for your kind comments.  You're right that none of this is rocket science; it's just rational thinking.  However, when parts break, people understandably get upset.  Emotions can run high, and there may be a tremendous amount of pressure.  As Ann points out, under these conditions, even intelligent and highly educated individuals may start to behave irrationally.  The most important thing is to stay calm and focused -- especially when others aren't.

@GlennA: Experts, in particular, are susceptible to the temptation to jump to conclusions.  The more experience you have, the more likely it is that a given problem resembles one you have encountered before.  But that doesn't necessarily mean it's the same problem! Sometimes experience can be just as blinding as ignorance.

@TJ McDermott: You're right that sometimes time constraints can force you into a "kitchen sink" response.  However, in these cases, it may be a good idea to continue investigating even after the "kitchen sink" solution has been implemented in order to determine the real root cause.  Who knows? Maybe you can make yourself look like a hero for a second time by coming up with a cost savings when you realize that 2/3 of the kitchen sink solution was unnecessary.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Also applies to Failure Analysis in Electronics
Nancy Golden   4/26/2012 7:12:31 PM
NO RATINGS
These principles also hold true for failure analysis in electronics. I worked for a semiconductor company for years as a product and test engineer and recognize most of these scenarios as having happened at one time or another. One of the most interesting places in a semiconductor plant is the F.A. lab which is usually where customer returns are evaluated. And of course when parts started failing on the production line, the first place everyone tries to blame is the test set - it never occurs to them that their process might have shifted...

AaronMoore
User Rank
Iron
Re: Also applies to Failure Analysis in Electronics
AaronMoore   4/27/2012 2:12:04 AM
NO RATINGS
I am so glad after read this article. I am an Engineer and faced this problem many time and this article really helps me to solve my mistakes. Everyone should read this blog.

free turbotax

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Great practical advice
Beth Stackpole   4/27/2012 7:08:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Dave: No doubt this could be a case of finger pointing at its finest. I think the points you made are critical for engineering teams to sit back, take a deep breath and dive into the problem rather than attack it without a plan.

ervin0072002
User Rank
Gold
I love this
ervin0072002   4/27/2012 9:27:19 AM
NO RATINGS

And yes I have been in all of the above situations. My favorite is getting a part in a box and being asked "why it broke?" Only the part is fully functional....

While all these were sound advice I personally still keep an open mind for problems that would be fixed quickly by one of these sinful actions. Countless times I have attached 100 probes and just measured data... and wala ten minutes later I know the solution.

It did bite me once when the issue was not design or a problematic part but rather EMI. See probes can make the EMI issue go away...



jmiller
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Great practical advice
jmiller   4/27/2012 10:12:09 AM
NO RATINGS
I liked the article as well.  Currently I am find myself trying to get to the bottom line of a lot of failures.  I find your article intersting because some of the things you suggest not to do are exactly what we are doing.  Our focus tends to start by understanding how big is the problem.  Not because we don't want to fix everything but more from the point that we don;'t have unlimited resources and we want to get the most bang for the buck.  We tend to try and get data and group the failures into different root causes.  And then do focus on if the part is to print.  Quite often the failures are caused because the part is not to print.  Once the part is to print and the variability is taken out the system then the root cause failure of the design can be attacked and improved.  However, if the parts are not capable and can't be to print, it doesn't matter how good the design gets because you will still have problems.

Page 1/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Guest Blogs
Because of the increasing ubiquity of wearable technology, it would be easy to think that design of wearable devices is routine and involves common design and engineering knowledge. Missed efforts in development will be remembered once the devices are used in the field
As governments, associations, and NGOs around the world seek to protect consumers, national and regional standards are becoming mandatory, challenging manufacturers and making testing and certification necessary for any product developed and brought to market.
Manufacturers of plastic parts recognize the potential of conformal cooling to reduce molding cycle times. Problem is, conformal molds require additive manufacturing (AM), and technologies in that space are still evolving. Costs also can be high, and beyond that, many manufacturing organizations lack the knowledge and expertise needed to apply and incorporate additive technologies into their operations.
Machine vision and video streaming systems are used for a variety of purposes, and each has applications for which it is best suited. This denotes that there are differences between them, and these differences can be categorized as the type of lenses used, the resolution of imaging elements, and the underlying software used to interpret the data.
In the face of growing challenges for embedded technology engineers, designers should actually be designing for a new IoT -- the Internet of Tomorrow.
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service