The solar photovoltaic (PV) market has evolved over the past five years from a condition of shortage of supply, low efficiency levels, and relatively high prices to its current state of proliferation of producers, overcapacity, and a drive to differentiate similar panel products through aesthetics and “nice to have” add-on features.
The dilemma for design engineers in a market with oversupply and reducing prices is what level of confidence exists in low-cost suppliers? A related question is whether "low cost" is really a pseudonym for low quality. That's because the imperative to save on cost can sometimes compromise excellence in production. Furthermore, with a profusion of panel models available, it can be a complex decision to know which features should be incorporated into a PV array. With a wide range of panel types available and no end of advice from manufacturers (each claiming competitive advantage), installers, and government-sponsored agencies, the selection choice can be baffling.
Constantly changing tariff feed-in rates is another factor to consider, as the calculation on the investment payback period can vary according to changing legislation. In fact, the only reason tariffs exist is to encourage consumer take-up and perhaps artificially create a market demand for product.
As grid parity -- the level where cost of production of fossil-based fuels matches cost of solar power generation -- approaches, then tariffs will be completely removed. This will then take much of the financial justification out of the equation, leaving the consumer to make a decision purely based on a drive to avail of renewable “green” energy supply.
Molex has been aiming for market diversification, with a broad portfolio of SolarSpec connectors suitable for a variety of PV-related applications. These play in both consumer markets and in rapidly evolving smart grid apps. We've also fielded junction box solutions with an eye toward enabling Western PV producers to compete with the low-cost Asian-based manufacturing sources.
About the author
Peter Commane, Global Product Manager for Molex Solar connectors, wrote this post. He is based in the company's design centre in Shannon, Ireland. To read related content, go to Molex's The Connector blog.
Grid parity is certainly a worthy goal, but questions remain about the real cost of building back-up systems to prevent blackouts when the sun's not shining. A recent editorial in The Wall Street Journal stated that renewables need "up to 90% of their capacity back up to revent blackouts." As long as we pay twice (or at least an extra 90%) for our power generation, solar will be a niche.
It took a really long time for the polycrystalline wafer-based PV market to achieve the solar power holy grail of volumes high enough to drive down cost-per-watt. But then it seems like a very short time elapsed before it went to oversupply. This isn't atypical of semiconductor-based markets, but it is disappointing.
Jim, that's incredible. Although back in the 70s and 80s we experienced similar resistance, to put it mildly, from utilities here in California about buy-back, it's now an established practice.
As I said the GT inverter already has shut down circuits and can't by code. There isn't a way for it to hurt a lineman. Please show in actual gridtie equipment how that can happen? And as I said even if it did it would short out. Basic physics.
I live in Fl and would have went into production of RE but only utilities can sell electricity here by our gov bought and paid for. Not only that but the ratepayers have to pay $.03/kw for 10 yrs to buy Progress and FPL 2 new nukes each for free! So I'm doing EV's instead.
As I said the GT inverter already has shut down circuits and can't by code. There isn't a way for it to hurt a lineman. Please show in actual gridtie equipment how that can happen? And as I said even if it did it would short out. Basic physics.
I live in Fl and would have went into production of RE but only utilities can sell electricity here by our gov bought and paid for. Not only that but the ratepayers have to pay $.03/kw for 10 yrs to buy Progress and FPL 2 new nukes each for free! So I'm doing EV's instead.
Jerry dycus, why so insulting? I am not EE but I do understand the physics of this. I think we both agree that the electrical code requires protecting the network from back-feeding ("islanding"):
http://homepower.com/article/?file=HP130_pg28_ATE_2
You are right that under most circumstances 1kW would just short but one could easily come up with a scenario where it wouldn't, e.g. when all the other neighborhood's transfer switches turn off, and the feeder wires are down, and the Pepco crew shows up to repair it. Unlikely, but possible, which is why UL 1741 is there.
Standard gensets use electro-mechanical transfer switches to accomplish that. You point that new grid-tie systems have automatic transfer switches; the link above describes how they do it, with small 'hunting' around the feed V/f, which I didn't know about---quite clever, that. Still, using your 20A wall outlets seem like a wrong way to go; limited current, and just the sheer inconvenience--there are no outlets on my house anywhere near where I might put the solar panels up. The only sane way to wire them would be a dedicated circuit going up into the attic, which I would wire permanently with a disconnect in or near the distribution panel.
On the topic of “selling back” power for profit, I was astonished to learn from a close associate who retired from 35 years as an EE and launched a small State-Licensed Solar contracting company in South Florida, that selling power back into “The Grid” has been declared Illegal in Florida. (Really-?!) I have encouraged my associate to seek anti-trust counsel.Learn more at http://schroedersolarenergy.com
przmek, have you ever done the math, studied or think about in any way what you just wrote?
First grid-tie inverters only work when the grid is up. Next even if it didn't stop, as designed from no grid signal, the load of the downed grid would short out any inverter rated at 1kw.
Many PV panels now come or equiped with a Microsine inverter that works the same but only 230wt.
You can't just plug in voltage-generating stuff into any 120vac outlet---it could back-feed the distribution network beyond the pole pig transformers during a power outage, and kill someone.
The overcapacity problem like in Lithium batteries too, means one needs to make their own market with added value as the price of PV, less than $1.50/wt now retail well shopped, means making money on just panels puts them in the commodity braket, also like lithium batteries.
So how does one stand out? By taking money from other pies. For instance installing PV it's no longer the panel price that is the big cost but instalation. So PV makers need to build 1-1.5kw modules that are plug and play, ie, fold out hinged or maybe bolt together panels prewired with a built in grid tie inverter. Then one can set it up in the front/back/side yard and plug it into any 120vac outlet.
These will be profitable at $3/wt now and cut installed costs for the customer by 40% or so. At these prices for homes, buildings in many places that pay retail power prices is already at parity in many places.
And if all the real costs of coal, oil were in them, not only wouldn't you need to subsidize RE but RE would cost less by a good amount.
Or build, own solar farms and sell the power for profit.
It's kind of like the homeowners now who can't sell their homes because no one can get a loan. But they could do the loan themselves and sell at a better price and faster.
The bottom line is if the market you are in is soft, get another market or steal market share by innovation!!
On April 21, NASA launched a novel project, putting into orbit three satellites that employ an off-the-shelf commercial smartphone as the control system.
The legacy endpoint devices that control our critical infrastructure (utility systems, water treatment plants, military networks, industrial control systems, etc.) are some of the most vulnerable devices on the Internet.
In a switched-capacitor filter, capacitors and switches take the place of resistors and accurately reproduce the characteristics of continuous-time Bessel, Butterworth, and elliptical filters.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 5
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This radio show will show what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
7 
