Top header wildcard
Electronics Industry Search
Already a member? Log In
New to the site? Register
TALK BACK

  Comments
  • There are no comments posted for this article.


Blogs
The Bad Driver List from I Have The Power!
There are more idiots on the roads these days than good drivers. When you find yourself in a near fender-bender with a wannabe Mad Max, what recour...


ADVERTISEMENT
  Print Friendly Version  |     Email This to a Friend  |     |  Article tools sponsored by 


Choosing the Right Model

 



ADVERTISEMENT


Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace



In past columns, we've discussed the essential role of modeling in mechatronics. Now, let's look at your options in designing a flexible actuator suspension.

This design involves a concept for a pick-and-place device for mounting chips on a printed circuit board (Figure 1). To evaluate this concept early in the design process, we initially neglect the motor electrical dynamics, the compliances of the timing belt, spindle and carriage guidance, the friction in the system and any nonlinear and parasitic effects. We then construct a low-order dynamic physical model (Figure 2), which takes into account only the rigid-body mode and the lowest mode of vibration, in this case from the frame mounting.

The system has one input — motor torque — and two outputs, actuator position Θ and end-effector position xe. Linear movements of the end effector me are a combination of movements due to actuator rotations and frame vibrations. This model is a good basis to provide reliable estimates of the dominant dynamic behavior of the concept.

There are three approaches for deriving the mathematical model for this physical model: block diagram, linear graph and bond graph. The block diagram approach requires you to draw free-body diagrams and apply Newton's Laws. Resulting equations can then be represented in block-diagram form. The bond graph (Figure 3) and the linear graph (Figure 4) approaches give us the mathematical model directly from the graphical representations. All three methods give the correct state-variable equations of motion.

To better understand all these methods, I contacted Professor Donald Margolis, UC Davis, co-author of "System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems" and a bond graph expert and Professor Derek Rowell, MIT, co-author of "System Dynamics: An Introduction" and a linear graph expert. They both offered valuable insights on their approaches and their books are essential for every practicing engineer. My colleague, Professor Mark Nagurka of Marquette University, also has experience with these approaches and provided additional information. Based on these discussions, we'll be posting a longer article on these modeling methods on Design News' website.

With this article, we conclude our emphasis on the key role of modeling in mechatronics and the importance of science and mathematics in the practice of mechatronics. Future articles will focus on mechatronic success stories and state-of-the-art mechatronic applications illustrating the value of what I have been preaching.


Author Information
Kevin Craig, Ph.D. is a professor of mechanical engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY. Check out www.designnews.com/mechatronicszone

  Print Friendly Version  |     Email This to a Friend  |     |  Article tools sponsored by 

 
Talkback Comments on this Story

There are no comments posted for this article.

ADVERTISEMENT
DN'S RESOURCE CENTER Get Free Information, Made Easy
| Product Brief
VIEW NOW

| Product Brief
VIEW NOW

View more View all DN resources