Being a retired automotive engineer, I couldn't agree more with your editorial about legislators trying to mandate the electric car (DN 2.26.07). In fact, legislators have been trying — successfully and unsuccessfully — for decades to mandate products, usually ahead of the technology necessary to economically produce those products.
A perfect example of this are fuel efficiency standards. These regulations, while well-intentioned and having produced modest gains, have also added hundreds, even thousands, to the cost of producing and the price of a car. You're also correct that most people, automotive company management included, have virtually no idea what an engineer actually does and how we do it.
Trained by TV to expect instant results, it's thought that, by simply demanding something (legislation), it will be a reality with no negative consequences. Indeed, careers and companies have been destroyed by this management and legislative arrogance.
I wish I saw a possibility of management and legislative enlightenment. However, with scientific “advisors” who've forgotten where their true loyalty lies (the truth) and willing to spout what their employer wants to hear, the situation will only get worse. I hope I'm wrong and that voices of reason like yours will be heard and sanity will prevail.
For someone who is so adamantly certain, you have got it completely wrong. Tens of thousands of EV's have been sold — they are called GEMS. They are currently sold in volume. The Prius, too, runs in battery mode and there have been tens of thousands of them sold. There are also tens of thousands of electric bicycles which are all classified as vehicles.
Given that most people can afford giant SUV's, they most certainly could afford to get rid of it, buy an electric commuter and rent a pickup when they need to move a 2 x 4.
But they don't, they just want to go on like you in their cosy consumeristic daze of materialism.
You sound just like the guys over at Car and Driver. The net effect of their staff has been to encourage people to buy ever bigger vehicles with ever bigger engines that they never really use, in the meanwhile generating hundreds of millions of tons of CO2 — really just to impress the neighbors.
I just read the electric car editorial and readers' comments (DN 2.26.07).
I think a large point in the movie “Who Killed the Electric Car” is that we really need PLUG-IN hybrids to satisfy the needs or nearly all drivers and move toward decreasing emissions.
If the batteries are sized to drive the electric motor with enough range for the average day's commuting needs and the gas motor is sized to supply energy to the motors under appropriate loading conditions (using batteries only as a buffer), then can't we have our cake and eat it, too?
The point is that the electric power companies are much better (greener) at getting power to us than the oil companies.
The term “well to wheels” is what I believe was the crux of the EV green argument. You need a plug to charge the car on off-peak hours. This happens while we sleep and virtually everyone can live with that.
In 1961, just married, we were living in Monrovia, CA, when my wife and I bought an entertainment center, Danish modern style, with TV, radio, amplifier and record changer from Sears (DN 10.23.06). It worked just fine and even survived a nearby lighting strike which burnt off one side of the antenna connection.
We had this entertainment center up until 1975. It survived several moves when in Gresham, OR, we gave it to the Goodwill still working fine. We have bought other Kenmore products and found them OK and service under warranty has been good.
JUNE 26TH WEBCAST: Collaborative Requirements Engineering
Speed your innovation. Capture the "voice of the customer" and translate customer requests into user requirements that define new products. Find out why the new ENOVIA Requirements Management solution enables organizations to improve their overall global requirements management process. Read More
Mechatronics in action
Successful synergistic integration of controls, electronics, computers and mechanical systems is key to the 21st century design process. Unlock the secrets at the Mechatronics Zone!
Webcast: Sensor Know-How Now
Join our moderator Randy Frank and John Keating from Cognex and explore Solving Industrial Inspection Problems. Read More
Engineering Concept Conduit
Engineering Concept Conduit looks at new products and the components that make them exceptional. Each month we’ll look at a new electronic product and see what makes it tick from an engineering point of view. We’ll explore the design and engineering challenges for the product and examine the components that solved those challenges.
Light Matters: Systems Level Approach to HBLED illumination applications
Its good practice to apply a systems-level approach to high-brightness LED (HBLED) illumination applications. Minimally, the system includes the optical, thermal and electrical characteristics of the of the HBLED, the lens (if any) which is built-in to its package, secondary optics such as external plastic lenses/reflectors to direct the light as your application requires and power driver electronics. Read More