Recently a software vendor was in to visit us here at Design News. The marketing manager related a story about a recent promotion they held that involved bundling software and hardware together as a special offer for design engineers. Essentially, the company was giving away the hardware as part of the promotion, along the same lines of what VW is doing with the iPod.
To the company's surprise and delight, the promotion was a smashing success. But why? What they ultimately figured out was that the engineers who were rushing to sign up for the deal had already spent their software budgets for the year. But they still had money left in their hardware budgets! The promotion was a perfect way for them to slip their software purchases through the system without raising any red flags.
Isn't that a crazy way to manage a business? Unfortunately, it's all too indicative of the way that some companies force employees to play elaborate games with their budgets these days.
When I was working on my MBA back in the early 1990s, cost-activity-based accounting was the big buzz word. The wanna-be bean-counters loved the idea. It was going to be the panacea that would help managers track all the costs associated with every single activity, product, or program—right down to the individual paper clip.
It's a good idea in theory. But what actually happens in the real world is something else altogether.
Instead of accurately tying costs to specific line items, activity-based accounting can actually create a false sense of accuracy. People (including me) often can't find a line item that's even close. As a case in point—actually sort of the reverse of the software promotion—I recently interviewed a candidate for an editorial position. When his trip expenses came in, I couldn't figure out what account to charge them to, since I don't have a line item labeled "recruiting." In retrospect, I should have gone to see him and charged it to my T&E. At least I have a line item for it.
In the end, the software company's free hardware promotion presented engineers with an opportunity to get tools that they needed—but only by giving them the opportunity to manipulate their company's accounting system.
Had management at those companies actually trusted engineers to spend the money in the best way they saw fit—I mean, hey, we're all adults here—their accounting systems might actually make some sense.
JUNE 26TH WEBCAST: Collaborative Requirements Engineering
Speed your innovation. Capture the "voice of the customer" and translate customer requests into user requirements that define new products. Find out why the new ENOVIA Requirements Management solution enables organizations to improve their overall global requirements management process. Read More
Mechatronics in action
Successful synergistic integration of controls, electronics, computers and mechanical systems is key to the 21st century design process. Unlock the secrets at the Mechatronics Zone!
Webcast: Sensor Know-How Now
Join our moderator Randy Frank and John Keating from Cognex and explore Solving Industrial Inspection Problems. Read More
Engineering Concept Conduit
Engineering Concept Conduit looks at new products and the components that make them exceptional. Each month we’ll look at a new electronic product and see what makes it tick from an engineering point of view. We’ll explore the design and engineering challenges for the product and examine the components that solved those challenges.
Light Matters: Systems Level Approach to HBLED illumination applications
Its good practice to apply a systems-level approach to high-brightness LED (HBLED) illumination applications. Minimally, the system includes the optical, thermal and electrical characteristics of the of the HBLED, the lens (if any) which is built-in to its package, secondary optics such as external plastic lenses/reflectors to direct the light as your application requires and power driver electronics. Read More
Design News RSS News Feeds
Webcast: Sensor Know-How Now
