by Larry Zirkle, P.E. Contributing writer --
Design News,
February 18, 2002
ADVERTISEMENT
Sponsored Content
Technology Marketplace
There are several pieces of evidence that can be used in estimating the speed of a vehicle involved in an accident. Skidmarks and the amount of damage (or crush) to the vehicle(s) are those most commonly used. Consider the case of a weary driver who went to sleep while approaching a curve on a rural two-lane road at night. He evidently awoke to find himself on a gravel shoulder headed directly toward a concrete retaining wall. Maximum braking was applied while on the gravel, traveling 8 ft on loose gravel and 32 ft on grass on a fairly level surface before hitting the wall head-on. The work done by friction indicates the change in kinetic energy (KE) prior to hitting the wall, but how do we determine the total change in KE?
The retaining wall had only minor surface damage. In addition to braking, most of the initial KE was transformed into strain energy through crushing the front of the car. Experience says that perhaps speed can be determined from the amount of crush. Automobiles are very complex structures composed of sheet metal, frame, engine, transmission, axles, and other metal, plastic, glass and fiberglass parts. It is practically impossible to determine the exact relationship between the amount of crush and the impact speed. Also, crush can be very difficult to quantify. Crush is represented by a complex three-dimensional surface, and is never uniform in any direction. However, simplified models and procedures have been developed that allow reliable estimates of the relationship between KE & crush. If the KE after impact and the KE consumed during impact is known, the KE just prior to impact can be determined, and from this the speed at impact.
One model assumes that the vehicle behaves like a linear plastic spring. This gives a linear relationship between impact force and crush depth. Thus, a relationship between impact speed V (mph) and D (average crush, inches) can be obtained,
V = V0 + k × D
V0 is the maximum speed at which no crush occurs (mainly due to bumper structures), and k is the crush stiffness for the particular vehicle. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and other organizations conduct crash tests and publish data from which values for k may be calculated. The NHTSA data is available on its website (www.nhtsa.gov-under crash data/research). Usually, data can be found for a particular vehicle or one that is similar. If not, it might be necessary to conduct an independent crash test to determine "k" for that particular model. Of course, the linear model is a simple approximation, and alternative models have been developed to overcome its limitations. One model assumes a car is like a reinforced thin walled column similar to a reinforced can. This model behaves elastically for small deflections, but buckles like a crushed can above a critical impact level.
The case above involves a 2000 Toyota Camry weighing 3596 pounds loaded, and the crush depth was calculated to be 22.4 inches. Using the linear model, NHTSA data indicates a crush stiffness of 1.6 mph/in. Using V0 = 2.5 mph, the speed at impact is calculated to be 38 mph. At high speeds, we can assume that the impact is plastic and the KE after impact is zero. Using coefficients of friction of 0.4 for the gravel shoulder, and 0.25 for the grass, the work done by friction prior to impact is 40,275 ft-lbs. Adding this to the KE at impact gives an initial KE of 216,839 ft-lbs, which translates into an initial speed of 42.5 mph.
Author Information
This report is part of a series authored by Larry Zirkle, a forensic engineer who specializes in vehicular accident reconstruction. Director of special projects for TECH, a consulting firm that provides mechanical design and FE services, Zirkle is a former professor of mechanical engineering at Oklahoma State University. You can reach Larry at Lzirkle@mail.techok.com or email your comments to us at kfield@cahners.com.
JUNE 26TH WEBCAST: Collaborative Requirements Engineering
Speed your innovation. Capture the "voice of the customer" and translate customer requests into user requirements that define new products. Find out why the new ENOVIA Requirements Management solution enables organizations to improve their overall global requirements management process. Read More
Mechatronics in action
Successful synergistic integration of controls, electronics, computers and mechanical systems is key to the 21st century design process. Unlock the secrets at the Mechatronics Zone!
Webcast: Sensor Know-How Now
Join our moderator Randy Frank and John Keating from Cognex and explore Solving Industrial Inspection Problems. Read More
Engineering Concept Conduit
Engineering Concept Conduit looks at new products and the components that make them exceptional. Each month we’ll look at a new electronic product and see what makes it tick from an engineering point of view. We’ll explore the design and engineering challenges for the product and examine the components that solved those challenges.
Light Matters: Systems Level Approach to HBLED illumination applications
Its good practice to apply a systems-level approach to high-brightness LED (HBLED) illumination applications. Minimally, the system includes the optical, thermal and electrical characteristics of the of the HBLED, the lens (if any) which is built-in to its package, secondary optics such as external plastic lenses/reflectors to direct the light as your application requires and power driver electronics. Read More