Top header wildcard
Electronics Industry Search
Already a member? Log In
New to the site? Register
TALK BACK

  Comments
  • There are no comments posted for this article.


Blogs
NPR Highlights US Postal Service Green Efforts from I Have The Power!
To highlight the excellent, cutting-edge alternative energy field testing conducted by the U.S. Postal service (USPS), National Public Radio (NPR) ...


ADVERTISEMENT
  Print Friendly Version  |     Email This to a Friend  |     |  Article tools sponsored by 


This won't hurt a bit

 



ADVERTISEMENT


Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace



Robert DeFrancesco's childhood trips to the dentist were terror-filled ordeals. Still haunted by memories of the high-pitched whine of the drill, he vowed that when he started his own practice he would make the experience more serene for his patients.

Luckily for him, he doesn't seem like the kind of guy who would want to hurt you. And as an Assistant Clinical Professor at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, he has a jump on some of the latest dental gadgetry designed with patient comfort in mind.

The most recent addition to DeFrancesco's operatory is an electric handpiece (aka drill), manufactured by KaVo, a Germany-based company that also developed the motor technology inside. It is used to perform simple restorative procedures such as cavity preparation, as well as more advanced procedures including crown preparation and root canals. And just think!, if the statistics hold up, most of us stand an extremely good chance of getting to experience this new technology first-hand!

Integrating the electric KaVo 700L motor directly into the handpiece system was a challenge for engineers, who wanted to maintain the compact size of a pneumatic drill. Along with a 3.75-inch-long brushless motor, engineers had to locate air and water coolant lines, as well as a bright light bulb inside the housing. A patented winding design for the stator provided the necessary clearances. A primary advantage of the brushless motor is that torque remains constant over a wide speed range and does not stall out under load, unlike air-driven drills -- allowing dentists to cut through tooth structure more quickly and easily.

Air to electric. The innovation from air to electric-powered dental drills actually took place here in the U.S. nearly a decade ago. What's changed today is that KaVo's electric handpiece is one of several new designs to incorporate a dc brushless motor. The technology has several inherent advantages that developers hope will increase electric's share of the U.S. dental drill market, which is estimated to be at only around 15%.

Targeted for non-dental applications as well, KaVo's KL700 motor features a two-pole permanent magnet on the rotor and a patented, 3-phase stator winding. A microcontroller-based unit provides speed control. A significant benefit is its ability to deliver constant, high torque (up to 3.68 oz-in) over a wide speed range (10,000 to 40,000 rpm, extendable to 74,000 to 200,000 rpm with attachments). The dentist selects the desired motor speed via a foot pedal and digital tachometer display. The attachment gears are made of stainless steel or nickel silver, durable enough, says Product Manager Frank Berlinghoff, to hold up under the highest rotational speeds.

He also points out that at 45W, the power output of the motor is substantially higher than the 18W produced by an air-driven turbine. Though perhaps he could have put it a bit more delicately, Berlinghoff says that the increased power gives the dentist more "excavating power," which results in less time to perform a particular procedure.

KaVo isn't the only motor maker that is targeting the market. Danaher Motion's Specialty Motors Group (Amherst, NY) is jumping into dental applications with its own version of a miniature brushless dc motor. Called the "B" series, it employs a 4-pole, permanent magnet rotor design with a 3-phase stator winding. Top speed is 100,000 rpm, and torque can be boosted up to 40 oz-inch through a series of precision planetary gearheads that are available in single and dual stage versions. The unit is also designed to withstand repeated autoclaving.

Torque it up. In most dental procedures, high torque is required to cut through the enamel, or outer layer of the tooth, which has a hardness of 300-400 Vickers. While the amount of material removed depends on the specific procedure, the typical reduction is in the neighborhood of 1 to 2 mm. To achieve the necessary torque with an air-driven turbine requires extremely high speeds (see chart), which can overheat the tooth surface and inflict damage.

"Using the electric handpiece, I am able to cut through tooth structure more quickly, with no stalling of the bur, resulting in less trauma to the tooth," says DeFrancesco, who also noted that it takes less time to perform a complex procedure like preparing a crown. Though he couldn't quantify the exact savings in minutes, DeFrancesco says that it could be substantial once a dentist is fully up to speed (no pun intended) using the new technology.

Not to be underestimated is the potentially enormous benefit of the electric drill's low noise output, especially with regard to the patient's psychological health. In fact, the sound of the drill is what people fear most about going to the dentist, says DeFrancesco. Anyone who has actually had a root canal might debate that, but at 56 dbA (in the range of normal conversation) the KL700 is significantly quieter than an air-driven turbine at around 75 dbA. The reduction is all the more impressive when you consider that decibels are logarithms of noise levels. When DeFrancesco de-monstrated the two drills side-by-side, bystanders agreed that the electric drill was quieter and less harsh-sounding.

Cost a limitation? While dentists may be intrigued with the new drill, the higher cost of electric tools is likely to continue to be a deterrent for some of them—at least in the short term. Costs are expected to fall as volumes increase.

"Cost has been the primary reason that the electric handpiece has been slow to catch on in the U.S. market," says DeFrancesco. "The total price tag including attachments can run anywhere from $2,000 and $3,000 for one unit. Contrast that with an air-driven handpiece, which only costs $500 to $800." He is planning to purchase one electric handpiece for his practice, which he will use only for longer, more complicated procedures.

However, he acknowledges that if maintenance costs are factored into the equation, the electric unit may wind up costing him less in the long run. Several features, including a lube-free motor and faster cutting, could give it the edge. Also, pneumatic drills require air-turbine replacement every 1-2 years.

Summing things up, DeFrancesco says that the electric handpiece "makes dentis-try easier and more enjoyable." Hey wait, dentists aren't actually supposed to take pleasure in drilling teeth, are they?


For more information
Go to www.designnews.com/info or enter the number on the Reader Service Card:

KL700 brushless dc motor
from Kavo : Enter 548
"B" series miniature slotted brushless motors
from Danaher : Enter 549
 

 

Coming to your dentist's office soon

IMAGING TECHNOLOGY

If you haven't noticed already, advanced imaging technology is beginning to make its way into dentistry, with such innovations as low-radiation film. Last year, Kodak released the product, which allows dentists to deliver lower radiation doses with what it claims is no compromise in image quality. The key, says Gerland Beckler, product line manager for the company's health imaging division, is a new film emulsion that works with greater speed. Also expect to see greater use of digital radiography, which reduces exposure to radiation significantly. And while digital photography itself is not totally new to dentistry, Beckler says that it is finally hitting a price/performance point that should spur market growth. Sensing an opportunity, Kodak just introduced a new digital photography kit that Beckler says will "have a dentist taking great digital photos in 15 minutes." Also on the horizon—a new optical method for non-invasive imaging of tissue. In development at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the technique involves the use of infrared light, the filtering of scattered photons that tend to blur images, and detection of low levels of reflected light to obtain a high resolution optical image. Potential applications include diagnosis of periodontal disease and cavity detection.

LASER TECHNOLOGY

Although the FDA approved use of lasers in dental applications in the early 1990s (1997 for treatment of cavities) the market acceptance of the technology has been slow—estimates are only in the 5% range. The major reason dentists are balking appears to be cost ($25K and up), compounded by the fact that separate lasers are required for hard and soft tissue procedures. Hoping to crack the market open, researchers continue to innovate. For example, a dual-wavelength laser technology developed by NASA for remote sensing of the atmosphere that is being adapted for dental applications could effectively cut the price in two. "Both wavelengths [810 nm for soft tissue and 2,940 nm for hard tissue] can be produced using the same hardware by varying the amount and rate of energy," says Dr. Craig Gimbel, a practicing dentist and co-founder of Lantis Laser, the company working with NASA Langley to commercialize the technology. But don't expect an overnight success: Commercialization is probably at least three years away, says Gimbel.

BIOTECHNOLOGY

What if you could be immunized against tooth decay and gum disease? Biotech re-search might lead to both some day. In fact, scientists at the Institute for Genomic Research and The Forsyth Institute hit the jackpot this year when they sequenced the genome of Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), a bacterium that is thought to be the culprit behind adult periodontitis (aka gum disease). "Work on this oral pathogen has been ongoing for decades. Now that we have this genetic blueprint, microbiologists will be able to get an idea of the potential of the bacterium to cause disease, grow anaerobically, resist host defenses, survive in the mouth, and so on," says Dennis Mangan, PhD. He is chief of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Infectious Diseases and Immunity Branch, which funded the project. The next step for researchers is to set up experiments to determine the structure and function of each of the some 2,000 genes in Pg, which may provide clues as to a good vaccine to kill the bacterium. As far as an actual vaccine, Margaret Duncan, a PhD in the Department of Molecular Genetics at the Forsyth Institute and one of the researchers on the project, estimates that it is at least ten years away. She says, "After testing in animals, we have to get through the FDA—and who knows how long that could take?"

  Print Friendly Version  |     Email This to a Friend  |     |  Article tools sponsored by 

 
Talkback Comments on this Story

There are no comments posted for this article.

ADVERTISEMENT
DN'S RESOURCE CENTER Get Free Information, Made Easy