ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in 10 seconds.
Electronics Industry Search
Advertisement
Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS
Article tools sponsored by

Double jeopardy on an ATV—the sequel

By Larry Zirkle, P.E., Contributing Editor -- Design News, November 18, 2002

Last month we discussed an accident involving a four wheel (4W) ATV that rolled while making a curve on a gravel country road. Two factors that cause rolling were involved in this case:

  1. 1. Lateral linear momentum due to skidding combined with impact with an obstruction; and

  2. 2. The overturning moment due to centrifugal force.

Another common cause for rolling in ATVs is the overturning tendencies due to the weight force (W) and dynamic forces when traveling on a slope. Even though this was not the situation in the case considered, it deserves consideration, and has some interesting aspects.

With reference to the accompanying figures, specifications for the 4W are: W =746 lbs, h=24.9 inches, L=49.3 inches, and d=21.5 inches. Since the rollover started on a level surface, W was not a factor in this accident. However, W is a factor for ATVs traveling on a slope since on a steep slope, W can produce an overturning moment. In order for this to occur the line of action of W, acting vertically through the center of gravity (CG), must pass outside the envelope of the tire contact points with the ground. This track envelope is square for a 4W ATV, and triangular for a three-wheel (3W) ATV, as shown. For an ATV traveling at a constant speed transverse to a slope, a vertical line through the CG would have to pass outside line A-A, shown in the figure, for W to cause a rollover. For a 3W, the vertical line through the CG would have to pass outside line B-B. The 3W ATV has a smaller track envelope than a similar sized 4W ATV. Since the CG is forward of the rear axle, and the envelope is narrower toward the front, a rollover would occur with less slope for a 3W than with a 4W.

The occurrence of rolling depends not on W but on geometry. W would only determine the rate at which rolling occurs. For a 4W with the specifications given above, a static analysis shows that rollover due to W would occur on a slope of 40.8° or more when traveling transverse to the slope. For a 3W with the same values for h, L and d, and for which the CG is a distance c = 29.6" from the front, rollover would occur on a slope of 27.4° or more, much less than for the 4W.

For a 4W traveling transverse to the slope, any steering will only increase the distance of W from the envelope, decreasing the tendency to roll due to W. However, for a 3W traveling at an angle "á" to the horizontal in the plane of the slope, a geometric analysis shows that the distance "m" of the CG from the envelope in the direction of W is given by:

m=cd/[Lcos(á)+dsin(á)]

From the figure, m obviously decreases as á increases, reaches a minimum value when m is perpendicular to A'-A', and then begins to increase. Thus, there is a critical value of á at which the 3W is more likely to overturn due to W. For the 3W specified above this angle is 23.6°. Further geometric analysis shows that the slope angle (Ö) at which rolling would occur for a given á is:

Ö=arctan{(c/L)(d/h)/[cos(á)+(d/L)sin(á)]}

Thus, Ö is determined by the static stability factor (2d/h), as well as a factor (c/L) related to how far back the CG is. For the critical value of steering given above, Ö=25.4° is not much different than the value for á=0°. This vehicle should not be ridden on a slope with an angle greater than this.

Of course, steering also introduces centrifugal forces as discussed last month in addition to W. If you get headed downhill at á=25° on this 3W, and start a turn back uphill, the combination of W and dynamic forces assure disaster. It's little wonder that you don't see many 3W ATVs around anymore.

Author Information
This report is part of a series authored by Larry Zirkle, a forensic engineer who specializes in vehicular accident reconstruction. Zirkle is a former professor of mechanical engineering at Oklahoma State University. You can reach Larry at lzirkle@brightok.net or e-mail your comments to us at kfield@reedbusiness.com. Note that space considerations do not allow consideration of all significant aspects of cases presented. Articles are focused on issues believed to be of general interest, and case presentation is tailored to the topic at hand. Details have been changed to assure anonymity.
Advertisement

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS
Article tools sponsored by
Find a supplier on oemsuppliersearch.com

Talkback


We would love your feedback!


» Submit talk back
Advertisement

DN's Resource Center Get Free Information, Made Easy

Advertisement

Design News Partner Zones

AnarkCAD/CAE Model Clean-Up: Reduce Iterative Cycles
Discuss how Recipe-Based Automation can help create "just-in-time" CAE-ready geometry when CAD models are updated. Register Now


Light Matters: Systems Level Approach to HBLED illumination applications
Its good practice to apply a systems-level approach to high-brightness LED (HBLED) illumination applications. Minimally, the system includes the optical, thermal and electrical characteristics of the of the HBLED, the lens (if any) which is built-in to its package, secondary optics such as external plastic lenses/reflectors to direct the light as your application requires and power driver electronics. Read More


Design Engineers' Portal for Sensing and Machine Safety
Whatever industry you're in, or whatever product you manufacture, the right sensors to automate your plant, and to improve your overall efficiency, quality and safety are a must. You'll find Banner Engineering to be an amazing resource of products, training and people with expertise.

Design News Partner Zone Directory »

Please visit these other Reed Business sites