ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in 10 seconds.
Electronics Industry Search

Polling Question

Should the government bail out U.S. automakers?

  • Yes
  • No



View Previous Poll Results
Advertisement
Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS
Article tools sponsored by

Automotive supplier 'sees' advantages of vision system

Dan Fritzinger, Contributing Editor -- Design News, June 18, 2001

Grand Rapids, MI —While many manufacturers rely on end-of-line inspection or lot inspection to assure quality, some companies are making the transition to machine vision systems.

One such company is Monroe Inc., a manufacturer of approximately 60 million automotive speedometer needles per year. With such a high-speed operation, Monroe couldn't afford to continue doing quality inspections downstream from production.

"We had to come up with a way in real time [to inspect product] because the screening people are downstream and catch it in delay. You can build up a pile of scrap [in a short amount of time]. We can sort 100% at the end of line, but that doesn't catch it in real time," reports Mike DeBat, manufacturing engineer for Monroe. "We were operating at 98-99% (good parts), but our customers were telling us that that wasn't good enough. Today [with machine vision] we're at 99.99%—in the neighborhood of 50 defective parts per million."

Machine vision systems are big business. According to a study to be released later this year from the Automated Imaging Association (AIA), total sales of imaging systems worldwide in 2000 exceeded $6 billion, with North American accounting for over $4 billion.

In the past, vision systems tended to be PC-based, very powerful, and very expensive. Five years ago a typical PC system could easily cost more than $25,000. But in recent years, self-contained microprocessor-based vision systems have been developed which can do approximately 80% of the things that the PC-based systems can do, for less than half the price. For Monroe, the switch from PC-based to Omron Electronics' (Schaumburg, IL) microprocessor system was obvious. "The PC-based was overkill for what we wanted to do. Price was also a consideration—Omron was about $5,000-$6,000 for a complete system; PC-based was roughly $20,000," says Debat.

But how accurate is computerized quality control? Monroe places Omron vision systems immediately downstream from the various production stages to catch defects before they are packaged. Then robotic sorters pick and place good and bad parts in the appropriate containers. Here's what they're looking for:

  • Absence of a counterweight that balances the needle

  • Absence of a pair of heat stakes that hold the needle to a mounting bushing

  • Improper heat stake size

  • Needles of incorrect color

  • Improper mounting hole size

  • Pinholes, dirt, scratches

  • Absence of decorative hot-stamp foil

  • Nicks and tears in the foil

  • Improper location of the foil

To detect the first six defects, Monroe uses Omron F-150 black-and-white systems with dual cameras. Dual cameras are necessary because Monroe often runs two assembly lines side by side to meet their production needs. These systems are capable of doing dimensional inspections in the 0.005–0.010-inch range. Notice that a black-and-white system is used to do gross color sorting of needle color. For cosmetic defects related to the hot-stamp foil, Monroe uses Omron's F-400 color system. This 512- x 484-pixel system is capable of extracting up to eight colors per scene.

Despite their high accuracy and low cost, vision system manufacturers still must address stereotypes. "For people who are on the fence and say, 'We can't afford this,' we have to reeducate them. That's been an ongoing process," says Jon Wright, controls engineer at Omron. "What customers have found is that we can do with a system under $10,000 what they were previously doing with a PC-based system which costs considerably more." Another stereotype is the reliability of human operators to catch defects. According to a study by Omron that compared the human eye and the vision system's abilities to catch a defect the first time on a molded part, the human eye was only 50% reliable in catching pin holes and flow lines compared to the vision system's 100% reliability. Wright sums it up with an Omron motto—"For the machine, the work of the machine; the man, the thrill of the development."

For more information about vision systems from Omron: Enter 541

  • related stories
  • resource center
  • by this author
 
 
Advertisement

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS
Article tools sponsored by
Find a supplier on oemsuppliersearch.com

Talkback


We would love your feedback!


» Submit talk back
Advertisement
Advertisement

Design News Partner Zones

AnarkCAD/CAE Model Clean-Up: Reduce Iterative Cycles
This webinar featured research and survey results related to problems associated with preparing CAD geometry for CAE applications.  We discussed how Recipe-Based Automation can help create "just-in-time" CAE-ready geometry each time a cad model is updated. Watch the Presentation


Light Matters: Systems Level Approach to HBLED illumination applications
Its good practice to apply a systems-level approach to high-brightness LED (HBLED) illumination applications. Minimally, the system includes the optical, thermal and electrical characteristics of the of the HBLED, the lens (if any) which is built-in to its package, secondary optics such as external plastic lenses/reflectors to direct the light as your application requires and power driver electronics. Read More


Design Engineers' Portal for Sensing and Machine Safety
Whatever industry you're in, or whatever product you manufacture, the right sensors to automate your plant, and to improve your overall efficiency, quality and safety are a must. You'll find Banner Engineering to be an amazing resource of products, training and people with expertise.

Design News Partner Zone Directory »

Please visit these other Reed Business sites